Practice Suppression of Opposition - 12.3.2 | 12. Rise of Militarism: Japan (1919–1937) | ICSE Class 11 History
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Academics
Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Professional Courses
Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

games

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What does censorship mean?

💡 Hint: Think about how the government regulates media.

Question 2

Easy

Give an example of political repression.

💡 Hint: Consider how the military dealt with critics.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What is censorship in the context of militaristic Japan?

  • Control of public discourse
  • Promotion of free speech
  • Encouragement of dissent

💡 Hint: Think about what the military wanted to prevent.

Question 2

True or False: Political repression included imprisoning those who opposed the military.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Consider extreme measures taken against dissenters.

Solve and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Evaluate the effectiveness of censorship as a tool for maintaining military power in Japan. What might have been some unintended consequences?

💡 Hint: Consider the long-term effects of repression on societal behavior.

Question 2

Argue whether the methods of suppression used in Japan during this era could be justified for national security. Provide a well-reasoned conclusion.

💡 Hint: Reflect on the balance between security and individual freedoms.

Challenge and get performance evaluation