Practice Logical Equivalence - 8.6 | 8. Mathematical Reasoning | ICSE Class 11 Maths
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Academics
Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Professional Courses
Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skillsβ€”perfect for learners of all ages.

games

8.6 - Logical Equivalence

Enroll to start learning

You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take mock test.

Learning

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

Define logical equivalence in your own words.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about when two statements can be true or false at the same time.

Question 2

Easy

Provide an example of two logically equivalent statements.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Consider commutative properties.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What does it mean for two statements to be logically equivalent?

  • They always have opposite truth values
  • They have the same truth value in every possible scenario
  • They are always true

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about the definition you learned.

Question 2

True or False: A statement and its negation are logically equivalent.

  • True
  • False

πŸ’‘ Hint: Recall how negation works.

Solve and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Establish whether 'A implies B' is logically equivalent to 'not B implies not A'. Use both a truth table and a theoretical explanation.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Construct a truth table for clarity.

Question 2

Consider the statements 'not (P or Q)' and 'not P and not Q'. Show their logical equivalence via De Morgan's Laws.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Review De Morgan's Laws for this.

Challenge and get performance evaluation