Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
Theories of Deviance explore the reasons behind behavior that deviates from social norms. Strain Theory posits that individuals may turn to deviance when they cannot attain societal goals through legitimate means. Labeling Theory discusses how societal labels contribute to the development of deviant identities, while Conflict Theory highlights the role of social inequality in defining and responding to deviance.
Deviance refers to behaviors or beliefs that violate societal norms, and understanding the reasons for such behaviors is crucial. Here, we examine three primary theories:
This theory suggests that deviance occurs when individuals are unable to achieve culturally sanctioned goals through acceptable means. Merton identified five modes of individual adaptation:
- Conformity: Accepting both the goals and the means.
- Innovation: Accepting goals but rejecting means, leading to deviance.
- Ritualism: Abandoning goals but maintaining the means.
- Retreatism: Rejecting both goals and means.
- Rebellion: Rejecting and attempting to change both.
Labeling Theory posits that deviance is not inherent in the act but rather in the societal reaction to the act. When individuals are labeled as deviant, they may internalize this label, leading to a self-fulfilling prophecy where they continue to engage in deviant behavior, thus becoming the
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Strain Theory (Robert Merton): Suggests that deviance occurs when individuals cannot achieve societal goals through accepted means.
Strain Theory posits that deviance results when individuals experience a disconnect between societal goals and the means available to achieve them. For example, a person may want to achieve financial success (a societal goal) but may not have the legitimate opportunities to do so (like a good education). This gap can lead some individuals to resort to deviant behavior, such as theft or fraud, as an alternative means to reach those goals.
Consider a student who dreams of going to college and earning a degree to secure a good job. However, if this student lacks the financial resources to apply for college or if their family can't support them, they may feel pressured or 'strained.' Faced with these difficulties, the student might consider taking illegal actions, such as selling drugs, to make quick money for tuition.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Labeling Theory (Howard Becker): Suggests that deviance is a result of societal labels placed on individuals.
Labeling Theory argues that deviance is not inherent in the act itself but is a result of how others perceive and label that act. Once someone is labeled as 'deviant,' they may start to identify with that label and change their behavior accordingly. This suggests that societal response plays a crucial role in defining what is considered deviant.
Imagine a high school student who is caught skipping class and gets labeled as a 'troublemaker' by teachers and peers. This label can become a self-fulfilling prophecy; feeling ostracized, the student might engage in more rebellious behavior simply because they've been labeled as deviant. This shows how societal perceptions can shape an individual's actions.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Conflict Theory: Views deviance as a consequence of social inequality and power struggles within society.
Conflict Theory posits that deviance results from the inequalities present in society, emphasizing that groups in power create definitions of deviance that serve their interests. In this view, those with less power are more likely to be labeled as deviant because the powerful seek to maintain control over societal norms and laws.
Think of how laws regarding drug use may disproportionately affect certain communities, often those with less social and economic power. For instance, during the War on Drugs in the United States, harsher penalties were often enforced in poorer neighborhoods, leading to higher rates of incarceration among marginalized populations. This illustrates how those in power can influence what is deemed deviant and unfairly target specific groups.