Practice Global Explanations - 3.2.2 | Module 7: Advanced ML Topics & Ethical Considerations (Weeks 14) | Machine Learning
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Academics
Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Professional Courses
Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skillsβ€”perfect for learners of all ages.

games

3.2.2 - Global Explanations

Learning

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

Define bias in the context of machine learning.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about how bias might affect outcomes for specific groups.

Question 2

Easy

What is Explainable AI (XAI)?

πŸ’‘ Hint: What is the primary goal of XAI?

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What is the primary concern of bias in machine learning?

  • Predictive accuracy
  • Fairness
  • Computational efficiency

πŸ’‘ Hint: Consider what bias impacts the most.

Question 2

True or False: Fairness metrics assess only the overall accuracy of a model.

  • True
  • False

πŸ’‘ Hint: Remember, fairness involves looking beyond averages.

Solve and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

You are tasked with developing a hiring model. Detail how you would approach ensuring fairness from data collection to model deployment.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Consider the steps in the ML process where bias can arise and how you can address them.

Question 2

Analyze the ethical implications if an AI system used in justice disproportionately impacts minority communities.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about the societal impacts of biased AI systems.

Challenge and get performance evaluation