Practice Tools for Evaluation & Iteration - 10.9 | Evaluating and Iterating Prompts | Prompt Engineering fundamental course
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What does PromptLayer do?

💡 Hint: Think about how we monitor changes over time.

Question 2

Easy

Why is user feedback important in prompt iteration?

💡 Hint: Consider how we learn from others' experiences.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What is the main function of PromptLayer?

  • Collect feedback
  • Track and compare prompts
  • Generate outputs

💡 Hint: Consider what you need to monitor changes effectively.

Question 2

True or False: Humanloop is primarily used for running tests on prompts.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Reflect on the primary purpose of feedback collection.

Solve 1 more question and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Select a prompt you have previously created. Use PromptLayer to log its iterations and analyze what changes could improve its effectiveness based on sample outputs.

💡 Hint: Focus on which changes produced the highest user satisfaction ratings.

Question 2

Create a hypothesis about user feedback on one of your prompts. How might you use Humanloop to test this hypothesis and what metrics would you track?

💡 Hint: Think about formulating specific questions to ask users about their experiences.

Challenge and get performance evaluation