In this section, 'What Makes a 'Good' Prompt?', we explore six evaluation areas that define the quality of a prompt. First, relevance assesses how well the response aligns with the original intent of the prompt. Clarity ensures that outputs are understandable for the end user, while factual accuracy verifies that any provided facts or logical steps are correct. Additionally, structure and format evaluate if outputs follow expected formats, such as bullet points or JSON, and tone appropriateness ensures that the output's tone matches the task at hand, whether it's formal or friendly. Lastly, consistency verifies that the prompt yields stable results across similar inputs, thereby ensuring reliability. Overall, these criteria play a vital role in refining prompts to improve user experience and effectiveness in practical applications.