Practice What Makes a 'Good' Prompt? - 10.2 | Evaluating and Iterating Prompts | Prompt Engineering fundamental course
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skillsβ€”perfect for learners of all ages.

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What does relevance in a prompt mean?

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about if the result answers the question asked.

Question 2

Easy

Why is clarity important in prompts?

πŸ’‘ Hint: Consider how confusion might affect understanding.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What does it mean for a prompt to be relevant?

  • It aligns with the intent
  • It's too complex
  • It's ambiguous

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think of what makes a prompt effective.

Question 2

True or False: A prompt can be effective even if it lacks clarity.

  • True
  • False

πŸ’‘ Hint: Recall how users might interpret unclear prompts.

Solve 2 more questions and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Create three different prompts for explaining the laws of thermodynamics: one for a child, one for a college student, and one for a physics expert. Evaluate each for relevance, clarity, and factual accuracy.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Consider the audience and their prior knowledge.

Question 2

Analyze a poorly constructed prompt like 'Talk about history.' Identify issues related to clarity, factual accuracy, and relevance. Suggest an improved version.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Focus on what details can make it better.

Challenge and get performance evaluation