Examples of Good vs Bad Prompts
This section discusses how the effectiveness of AI responses can be significantly influenced by the quality of prompts provided. It outlines the importance of crafting prompts that are clear, specific, and structured to guide AI models effectively.
Poor vs Improved Prompts
A well-designed prompt tends to minimize ambiguity while guiding the model towards the desired response. Here are some key contrasts:
-
“Tell me about climate change” vs “Write a 3-paragraph summary explaining the causes and effects of climate change.”
The improved prompt specifies the length and scope of the response.
-
“Give feedback on this resume.” vs “Act as a hiring manager. Give 3 strengths and 2 weaknesses in this resume.”
The latter clearly defines the perspective and the number of points expected.
-
“Summarize this article.” vs “Summarize this article in 5 bullet points using clear, concise language.”
Clarity and formatting expectations are provided here.
The principle underlying these examples is simple: the better the input (prompt), the better the output (response) from the model. Therefore, applying the prompt design principles discussed in earlier sections—such as clarity, specificity, and structure—results in more effective interaction with AI.