5.3 - Equivalence Partitioning (EP)
Enroll to start learning
Youβve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Interactive Audio Lesson
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Introduction to Equivalence Partitioning
π Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Today we will be discussing Equivalence Partitioning, or EP. Can anyone tell me what they think it means?
Is it about grouping things?
Exactly! EP involves dividing input data into meaningful groups known as equivalence classes. Each class can be treated as a representative for testing.
How does it save time in testing?
By allowing testers to validate one value from each class instead of testing every single input value. This reduces the number of tests required while maintaining reasonable coverage.
So we don't have to test every possible input?
Correct! It's all about efficiency. Let's remember: 'Classify to simplify.'
Where to Use Equivalence Partitioning
π Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Now that we understand what EP is, can anyone think of some scenarios where we could use it?
Maybe in form validations like age or email addresses?
Exactly! Input fields with logical categorizations based on validity are perfect for this technique. For instance, validating an age between 18 and 60 can use EP.
What would we do for invalid ages?
You would identify classes like 'too low' for age 10 and 'too high' for age 70. Each class gives us a valuable insight into potential defects.
What about testing passwords, can we use EP for that?
Yes! Testing password strength can be categorized into valid, invalid β like too short or lacking special characters. 'Group to test, avoid the rest!'
Crafting Test Cases with Equivalence Partitioning
π Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Letβs move to developing test cases using EP. What does this look like practically?
We would list different inputs, right?
Correct! Youβll identify each equivalence class and then choose test cases based on that. Can someone give me an example?
For age, we would test 25 for valid, 10 for invalid low, and 70 for invalid high.
Perfect! Remember, the rule is to test at least one representative input from each class. 'One in, all through!' is our mantra here.
How do we know we haven't missed an important case?
This is where combining EP with other techniques like Boundary Value Analysis can really enhance coverage.
Advantages and Limitations of Equivalence Partitioning
π Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Lastly, letβs talk about the pros and limitations of EP. What do you think is a key advantage?
It saves time with fewer test cases!
Exactly! It's efficient and allows for a broader test coverage with limited effort. However, what about limitations?
It might miss edge cases?
Great point! If input values behave differently near the edges, EP might not fully capture that unless combined with boundary testing. So, always keep in mind: 'Group wisely, but test thoroughly!'
Introduction & Overview
Read summaries of the section's main ideas at different levels of detail.
Quick Overview
Standard
This section covers Equivalence Partitioning (EP), a method used in software testing to classify input data into valid and invalid groups. By testing just one value from each group, testers can efficiently identify defects and improve test case design.
Detailed
Equivalence Partitioning (EP)
Equivalence Partitioning (EP) is a powerful software testing technique that streamlines the testing process by dividing input data into distinct classes of equivalent inputs. The foundational concept is that if one test case from a class passes or fails, all other cases in that class are likely to exhibit similar behavior. This method is particularly beneficial for increasing efficiency in test case creation and execution.
Key Points:
- Definition: EP categorizes inputs into equivalence classes to represent the whole group efficiently.
- Usage: It is ideal when input values can be logically grouped, specifically into valid and invalid categories.
- Example: For an age-related input where valid values range from 18 to 60, valid classes would include ages like 25, while invalid classes would capture values like 10 (too low) and 70 (too high).
- Efficiency: By testing one representative value from each class rather than every possible value, EP saves time and resources in the testing process.
Using EP effectively enables teams to maximize coverage while minimizing effort, making it an essential technique in the arsenal of software testing strategies.
Audio Book
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Definition of Equivalence Partitioning
Chapter 1 of 4
π Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
πΉ Definition:
Divides input data into equivalent classes, where one test from each class represents the whole group.
Detailed Explanation
Equivalence Partitioning (EP) is a testing technique that groups inputs into classes or categories. The idea is that if one test case from a class passes, then all the other cases in that class are likely to pass as well. It simplifies the testing process by allowing testers to focus on representative values instead of testing every possible input value.
Examples & Analogies
Think of a fruit shop that sells apples, bananas, and oranges. Instead of testing every type of apple, you can test one of each color or size, which should represent the other apples as well. By doing this, you save time while still ensuring quality.
Where to Use Equivalence Partitioning
Chapter 2 of 4
π Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
πΉ Where to Use:
When input values can be grouped logically (valid/invalid classes)
Detailed Explanation
EP is particularly useful in scenarios where inputs can be logically categorized into valid and invalid groups. For example, if a system accepts age inputs between 18 and 60, any age within that range is valid, while ages below 18 and above 60 are invalid. By identifying these groups, testers can determine which classes require comprehensive testing.
Examples & Analogies
Consider a movie theater that allows tickets for ages 13 and older. If you know that ages 13 to 60 are valid, you can categorize people into groups: those who can buy a ticket (valid) and those who are younger than 13 (invalid). You only need to check one person from each group to ensure the system works correctly for that age category.
Example of Equivalence Partitioning
Chapter 3 of 4
π Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
πΉ Example:
Field: Age (Allowed: 18β60)
| Partition Type | Input | Expected Result |
|---|---|---|
| Valid | 25 | Accepted |
| Invalid Low | 10 | Rejected |
| Invalid High | 70 | Rejected |
Detailed Explanation
In this example, we have a field for age inputs. The valid range is defined as 18 to 60. The example illustrates how we categorize this input into three classes: valid inputs (e.g., 25), low invalid inputs (e.g., 10), and high invalid inputs (e.g., 70). Each test will check just one representative input from each category instead of testing many other values in the same category.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine a diet program that accepts participants aged between 18 and 60. If you only need to test three peopleβone valid age (25), one below the limit (10), and one above the limit (70)βyou can be confident that the system will handle others in those ranges correctly without needing to test each possible age.
Efficiency of Equivalence Partitioning
Chapter 4 of 4
π Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
π Save time by testing just one value from each class instead of every value.
Detailed Explanation
The main advantage of Equivalence Partitioning is that it allows testers to significantly reduce the number of test cases by testing representative values from each class. This saves time and resources while still ensuring comprehensive test coverage.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine a student preparing for an exam covering a variety of topics. Instead of studying every detail from every chapter, the student focuses on key themes or major questions that are representative of the material. By doing so, they maximize their understanding and efficiency in studying without getting bogged down by every minor detail.
Key Concepts
-
Equivalence Partitioning: A technique for dividing input data into equivalent classes.
-
Valid Class: Input values within the accepted range that are expected to pass testing.
-
Invalid Class: Input values outside the acceptable range that should fail testing.
-
Efficiency: Using EP reduces the number of test cases required while maintaining coverage.
Examples & Applications
In a form that accepts age from 18 to 60, valid classes could be ages like 25 and 30, while invalid classes would be below 18 or above 60.
For a password strength test, a valid password may have at least 8 characters with a mix of letters and numbers, while invalid passwords could be too short or lacking complexity.
Memory Aids
Interactive tools to help you remember key concepts
Rhymes
Classify input, donβt test them all; one from each group answers the call.
Stories
Imagine a teacher sorting students into groups based on their grades. By testing just one student from each group, she saves time while understanding how the whole class performs.
Memory Tools
VIC (Valid, Invalid, Classes) - Remember to categorize all inputs!
Acronyms
EP (Equivalence Partitioning)
Ensure to Partition for Testing efficiently!
Flash Cards
Glossary
- Equivalence Partitioning
A testing technique that divides input data into equivalent classes in order to represent the whole group with fewer test cases.
- Equivalence Class
A subset of input data that is treated as a single unit for testing, where the behavior is expected to be similar.
- Valid Class
A group of inputs that are acceptable and expected to pass the test.
- Invalid Class
A group of inputs that are unacceptable and expected to fail the test.
Reference links
Supplementary resources to enhance your learning experience.