Types of Testing
This section categorizes testing into various types based on methodology and focus. Understanding these categories is crucial for QA professionals to select the best approach for their project needs.
1. Manual Testing vs Automation Testing
Manual Testing refers to human-led testing endeavors without automated tools, ideal for early-stage projects or infrequently repeated tests. It benefits from human intuition but can be slow and unscalable for repetitive tasks.
Automation Testing, on the other hand, incorporates scripts to automate tests, suitable for repetitive testing needs like regression or performance tests, offering speed and accuracy at the cost of initial setup time and scripting knowledge.
2. Functional vs Non-Functional Testing
Functional Testing focuses on validating the business logic of the application—what it does. It includes unit testing, integration, system, and UAT.
Non-Functional Testing assesses the system's performance attributes such as speed and usability. Variants include performance, security, and usability testing.
3. Common Types of Testing
Describes specific testing approaches such as Regression, Smoke, Sanity, UAT, and Performance Testing. Each type has unique purposes and triggers, essential to ensure application stability and performance as part of the overall quality assurance strategy. These include:
- Regression Testing: Validates that new changes don’t break existing functionalities.
- Smoke Testing: Ensures core functionalities are stable.
- Sanity Testing: Verifies specific bug fixes.
- UAT: Ensures product meets business needs.
- Performance Testing: Measures system behavior under diverse scenarios.
Final Takeaways
Choosing the appropriate testing type is pivotal, balancing the context, criticality, and test frequency. Manual and automated tests complement each other. Functional testing qualifies the application's actions, whereas non-functional tests define the application's quality under varying conditions.