Crucial Relationship To Impulse Response (6.1.1.4.2) - Time Domain Analysis of Discrete-Time Systems
Students

Academic Programs

AI-powered learning for grades 8-12, aligned with major curricula

Professional

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design

Games

Interactive Games

Fun games to boost memory, math, typing, and English skills

Crucial Relationship to Impulse Response

Crucial Relationship to Impulse Response

Introduction & Overview

Read summaries of the section's main ideas at different levels of detail.

Quick Overview

For any Discrete-Time Linear Time-Invariant (DT-LTI) system, the **step response `s[n]` and the impulse response `h[n]` are fundamentally and directly related**. * The **step response `s[n]` is the running sum (accumulation) of the impulse response `h[n]`**: $s[n] = \\sum\_{k=-\\infty}^{n} h[k]$. * Conversely, the **impulse response `h[n]` is the first difference of the step response `s[n]`**: $h[n] = s[n] - s[n-1]$. This bidirectional relationship allows one to be derived from the other and highlights their intrinsic connection within LTI system analysis.

Audio Book

Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.

Step Response and Impulse Response: Crucial Relationship

Chapter 1 of 1

πŸ”’ Unlock Audio Chapter

Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience

0:00
--:--

Chapter Content

6.1.1.4.2 Crucial Relationship to Impulse Response: Given the intrinsic relationship between $u[n]$ and $\delta[n]$, there exists a direct and important relationship between $s[n]$ and $h[n]$ for any LTI system:
* Step Response from Impulse Response: The step response is obtained by computing the running sum (accumulation) of the impulse response:
$$s[n]=\sum_{k=-\infty}^{n} h[k]$$
* Impulse Response from Step Response: Conversely, the impulse response can be obtained by taking the first difference of the step response:
$$h[n]=s[n]-s[n-1]$$

Detailed Explanation

No detailed explanation available.

Examples & Analogies

No real-life example available.

Key Concepts

  • s[n] from h[n]: Accumulation (running sum) of h[n].

  • $s[n] = \sum\_{k=-\infty}^{n} h[k]$

  • h[n] from s[n]: First difference of s[n].

  • $h[n] = s[n] - s[n-1]$

  • Why: Direct consequence of $u[n] = \sum \delta[k]$ and $\delta[n] = u[n] - u[n-1]$, combined with LTI properties.

  • Practical Value: Enables measurement of s[n] (often easier) and derivation of h[n] for analytical purposes; offers intuitive visualization of transient behavior.


  • Examples

  • Example 1: Finding Step Response from Impulse Response

  • Given h[n]: Let $h[n]$ be a system that averages the current and previous sample: $h[n] = 0.5\delta[n] + 0.5\delta[n-1]$.

  • In sequence form: $h[n] = {\underline{0.5}, 0.5, 0, 0, ...}$ (underline at $n=0$).

  • Find s[n] using $s[n] = \sum\_{k=-\infty}^{n} h[k]$:

  • For $n \< 0$: $s[n] = 0$ (since $h[k]=0$ for $k\<0$).

  • For $n = 0$: $s[0] = h[0] = 0.5$.

  • For $n = 1$: $s[1] = h[0] + h[1] = 0.5 + 0.5 = 1$.

  • For $n = 2$: $s[2] = h[0] + h[1] + h[2] = 0.5 + 0.5 + 0 = 1$.

  • For $n \> 1$: $s[n] = 1$ (since $h[k]=0$ for $k\>1$, the sum beyond $k=1$ does not change).

  • Result s[n]: $s[n] = {\underline{0.5}, 1, 1, 1, ...}$ for $n \ge 0$.

  • This shows the output rising to 0.5 at $n=0$ and then settling to 1.0.

  • Example 2: Finding Impulse Response from Step Response

  • Given s[n]: Let $s[n]$ be the step response of a simple delay system: $s[n] = u[n-1]$.

  • In sequence form: $s[n] = {..., 0, \underline{0}, 1, 1, 1, ...}$ (underline at $n=0$).

  • Find h[n] using $h[n] = s[n] - s[n-1]$:

  • For $n \< 0$: $h[n] = s[n] - s[n-1] = 0 - 0 = 0$.

  • For $n = 0$: $h[0] = s[0] - s[-1] = 0 - 0 = 0$.

  • For $n = 1$: $h[1] = s[1] - s[0] = 1 - 0 = 1$.

  • For $n \> 1$: $h[n] = s[n] - s[n-1] = 1 - 1 = 0$.

  • Result h[n]: $h[n] = {..., 0, 0, \underline{0}, 1, 0, 0, ...}$ (underline at $n=0$).

  • This confirms that the impulse response is indeed $h[n] = \delta[n-1]$, which is the impulse response for a unit delay system.


  • Flashcards

  • Term: s[n] = Ξ£ h[k]

  • Definition: The step response is the running sum (accumulation) of the impulse response.

  • Term: h[n] = s[n] - s[n-1]

  • Definition: The impulse response is the first difference of the step response.

  • Term: Accumulation

  • Definition: The operation converting h[n] to s[n].

  • Term: First Difference

  • Definition: The operation converting s[n] to h[n].

  • Term: Practical Significance

  • Definition: Allows derivation of h[n] from easily measurable s[n], and provides intuitive transient visualization.


  • Memory Aids

  • "Step = Sum": The word "Step" has an "S", and "Sum" has an "S". The Step Response is the Sum (accumulation) of the Impulse Response.

  • "Impulse = Instantaneous Difference": An impulse is an instantaneous spike. How do you get an instantaneous change from a gradually changing step? By taking the difference between two consecutive steps. The impulse is the "instantaneous change" in the step.

  • Analogy: Odometer vs. Speedometer:

  • Odometer (total distance): Analogous to Step Response ($s[n]$) - it accumulates mileage (input) over time.

  • Speedometer (instantaneous speed): Analogous to Impulse Response ($h[n]$) - it shows the rate of change of distance.

  • How do they relate? Your total distance (odometer) is the sum of all your instantaneous speeds over time. Your instantaneous speed (speedometer) is the difference in distance over a very short time interval.

  • This analogy perfectly captures s[n] = Ξ£ h[k] and h[n] = s[n] - s[n-1].

Examples & Applications

Example 1: Finding Step Response from Impulse Response

Given h[n]: Let $h[n]$ be a system that averages the current and previous sample: $h[n] = 0.5\delta[n] + 0.5\delta[n-1]$.

In sequence form: $h[n] = {\underline{0.5}, 0.5, 0, 0, ...}$ (underline at $n=0$).

Find s[n] using $s[n] = \sum\_{k=-\infty}^{n} h[k]$:

For $n \< 0$: $s[n] = 0$ (since $h[k]=0$ for $k\<0$).

For $n = 0$: $s[0] = h[0] = 0.5$.

For $n = 1$: $s[1] = h[0] + h[1] = 0.5 + 0.5 = 1$.

For $n = 2$: $s[2] = h[0] + h[1] + h[2] = 0.5 + 0.5 + 0 = 1$.

For $n \> 1$: $s[n] = 1$ (since $h[k]=0$ for $k\>1$, the sum beyond $k=1$ does not change).

Result s[n]: $s[n] = {\underline{0.5}, 1, 1, 1, ...}$ for $n \ge 0$.

This shows the output rising to 0.5 at $n=0$ and then settling to 1.0.

Example 2: Finding Impulse Response from Step Response

Given s[n]: Let $s[n]$ be the step response of a simple delay system: $s[n] = u[n-1]$.

In sequence form: $s[n] = {..., 0, \underline{0}, 1, 1, 1, ...}$ (underline at $n=0$).

Find h[n] using $h[n] = s[n] - s[n-1]$:

For $n \< 0$: $h[n] = s[n] - s[n-1] = 0 - 0 = 0$.

For $n = 0$: $h[0] = s[0] - s[-1] = 0 - 0 = 0$.

For $n = 1$: $h[1] = s[1] - s[0] = 1 - 0 = 1$.

For $n \> 1$: $h[n] = s[n] - s[n-1] = 1 - 1 = 0$.

Result h[n]: $h[n] = {..., 0, 0, \underline{0}, 1, 0, 0, ...}$ (underline at $n=0$).

This confirms that the impulse response is indeed $h[n] = \delta[n-1]$, which is the impulse response for a unit delay system.


Flashcards

Term: s[n] = Ξ£ h[k]

Definition: The step response is the running sum (accumulation) of the impulse response.

Term: h[n] = s[n] - s[n-1]

Definition: The impulse response is the first difference of the step response.

Term: Accumulation

Definition: The operation converting h[n] to s[n].

Term: First Difference

Definition: The operation converting s[n] to h[n].

Term: Practical Significance

Definition: Allows derivation of h[n] from easily measurable s[n], and provides intuitive transient visualization.


Memory Aids

"Step = Sum": The word "Step" has an "S", and "Sum" has an "S". The Step Response is the Sum (accumulation) of the Impulse Response.

"Impulse = Instantaneous Difference": An impulse is an instantaneous spike. How do you get an instantaneous change from a gradually changing step? By taking the difference between two consecutive steps. The impulse is the "instantaneous change" in the step.

Analogy: Odometer vs. Speedometer:

Odometer (total distance): Analogous to Step Response ($s[n]$) - it accumulates mileage (input) over time.

Speedometer (instantaneous speed): Analogous to Impulse Response ($h[n]$) - it shows the rate of change of distance.

How do they relate? Your total distance (odometer) is the sum of all your instantaneous speeds over time. Your instantaneous speed (speedometer) is the difference in distance over a very short time interval.

This analogy perfectly captures s[n] = Ξ£ h[k] and h[n] = s[n] - s[n-1].

Memory Aids

Interactive tools to help you remember key concepts

🧠

Memory Tools

The word "Step" has an "S", and "Sum" has an "S". The Step Response is the Sum (accumulation) of the Impulse Response.
- **"Impulse = Instantaneous Difference"

🎨

Analogies

Odometer vs. Speedometer:
* Odometer** (total distance)

🧠

Memory Tools

Analogous to Impulse Response ($h[n]$) - it shows the rate of change of distance.
* How do they relate? Your total distance (odometer) is the
sum
of all your instantaneous speeds over time. Your instantaneous speed (speedometer) is the difference in distance over a very short time interval.
* This analogy perfectly captures s[n] = Ξ£ h[k] and h[n] = s[n] - s[n-1].

Flash Cards

Glossary

Linearity and TimeInvariance (LTI)

The fundamental properties of systems that enable this direct relationship between h[n] and s[n].

Practical Value

Enables measurement of s[n] (often easier) and derivation of h[n] for analytical purposes; offers intuitive visualization of transient behavior.

Result `h[n]`

$h[n] = {..., 0, 0, \underline{0}, 1, 0, 0, ...}$ (underline at $n=0$).

Definition

Allows derivation of h[n] from easily measurable s[n], and provides intuitive transient visualization.

Analogy: Odometer vs. Speedometer
  • Odometer (total distance): Analogous to Step Response ($s[n]$) - it accumulates mileage (input) over time.