Practice Topics Covered - 7.2 | Software Engineering - Advanced White-Box Testing Techniques | Software Engineering Micro Specialization
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Academics
Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Professional Courses
Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skillsβ€”perfect for learners of all ages.

games

7.2 - Topics Covered

Learning

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What does Condition Testing aim to achieve?

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about the focus on evaluating logical expressions.

Question 2

Easy

What is Basic Condition Coverage?

πŸ’‘ Hint: Recall the evaluation of individual conditions.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What does Condition Testing primarily focus on?

  • Enhancing UI
  • Validating logical conditions
  • Testing database relations

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about the key focus of this testing technique.

Question 2

True or False: MC/DC guarantees that every condition independently affects decision outcomes.

  • True
  • False

πŸ’‘ Hint: Focus on the explicit requirement of MC/DC.

Solve 1 more question and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Design a testing strategy using both BCC and MC/DC for the expression if (A || (B && C)). How many test cases are needed?

πŸ’‘ Hint: Consider how many outcomes each condition can present.

Question 2

Evaluate the pros and cons of Condition Testing in comparison to traditional methods.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Reflect on the audience and context in which these methods apply.

Challenge and get performance evaluation