Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Welcome, everyone! Today, we are discussing how to find the traction force using a simpler approach. Can anyone remind me what traction force is?
Isn't it the force per unit area acting on a surface?
Exactly! Now, in our cylindrical element, we previously looked at variations in traction. What's our approach now?
We are assuming traction is constant over the surface, right?
Spot on! By assuming constant traction, we can multiply it by the area of the face for simplification. Let's illustrate this with a diagram.
Looking at our cylindrical element, can anyone identify the key dimensions we need to consider?
We need the radius and the height to determine the area.
Correct! For the z-planes, what's the area formula?
It's A = r∆θ∆z.
Great job! Now applying our constant traction assumption, why is it effective?
Because it simplifies the equations we work with and still gives valid results.
Now, let’s talk about Taylor’s expansion. Why do we still utilize it if we have this simplification?
To check if there's any significant variation in traction, right?
Exactly! Even if we assumed constancy, we want to ensure our assumptions are valid. What do we expect from the derivative terms?
They should cancel out or yield smaller order terms.
Well said. This validation reinforces why our simplified approach holds!
Next, let’s look at the forces coming from the +r and -r planes. What do you remember about their calculation?
We multiply the traction at the center with the area of each respective plane.
Great! What about the u terms in our expressions?
Those will also have to be considered when we expand using Taylor's series.
Exactly! Those terms provide important context for our derivations.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section outlines a more straightforward method for calculating the total traction force on cylindrical elements by assuming constant traction across defined planes. This simplification helps derive important equations while maintaining accuracy in the context of linear momentum balance.
In this section, we discuss a simplified derivation for calculating the traction forces acting on a cylindrical element, focusing on the cylindrical coordinate system. Previously, detailed variations of traction across surfaces were considered, but now we employ a more straightforward approach by assuming traction remains constant across each face of the element.
This approach allows for a clearer view of how traction forces contribute to the linear momentum balance, which is vital in applications of mechanics.
In summary, this section lays a foundational understanding for analyzing stresses and forces in cylindrical coordinates, essential for future discussions about more complex systems.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Let us consider the cylindrical element shown in Figure 2. Earlier, we had done the derivation by also considering the variation of traction at different points on +z and −z planes. If we assume the traction to be constant everywhere on the plane with its value being equal to the value at the center of the plane, we can directly multiply it with the area of the plane to get the total force. We illustrate it now.
In this part, we are introducing a simplified method to calculate the traction force on a cylindrical element. The critical assumption here is that we consider the traction force to be consistent across the entire +z and −z planes. Instead of calculating the variation in traction at different locations across these planes, we treat it as constant and simply take the value at the center of those planes. By multiplying this constant traction value by the area of the plane, we can more easily find the total force acting on it.
Think of a flat sponge being pressed down. If you apply the same pressure everywhere on the sponge's surface, you can easily calculate the total force by just multiplying the pressure (traction) by the sponge's area. However, if you pressed harder in some areas than others, it would complicate things significantly.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
As the center of the cylindrical element has coordinates (r, θ, z), the center of the +z plane will be at (r, θ, z + ∆z). Thus, the traction at the center of +z plane will be.
Here, we define the coordinates for our cylindrical element to specify where we are measuring the traction force. The center of the cylindrical element is marked by three coordinates: r (the radial direction), θ (the angular coordinate), and z (the height). When we focus on the +z plane, we note that its center is located slightly above the cylindrical element (up by ∆z). This localization helps in calculating the specific traction value that we will use in our total force calculations.
Imagine standing at the center of a tall cylindrical tower. Your height (z) marks your position in vertical space, while your distance from the tower's central column (r) determines how far you are from it. Your direction facing can be described by the angle (θ), similar to how we identify points on the cylindrical element.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
The three basis vectors in the above expression, when evaluated at the center of +z plane will be the same as the one at the center of cylindrical element because the two points have the same θ coordinate.
When we evaluate the basis vectors needed for our calculations, we find that the vectors representing direction at the center of the +z plane remain unchanged from those at the center of the cylindrical element. This consistency occurs because both points share the same angular coordinate (θ). Hence, it allows simplifications in the calculations without any need to adjust for the basis vectors across the two points.
Picture a train that runs on a circular track. No matter how far along the track you go, the basic direction and layout (like the track layout) do not change. So, while you're on different positions (like at +z plane or at the center), the core mechanism of your movement remains the same and allows for straightforward calculations.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Thus, the total force on the two z planes will be obtained after assuming that traction does not vary over different points in a face of the cylindrical element.
By making the assumption that the traction remains constant across the +z and -z planes, we can calculate the total force acting on both planes much more straightforwardly. This simplification helps us bypass complications that would have arisen from varying traction, allowing us to focus solely on the area and the constant value of traction we identified earlier.
Think of a tablecloth being pulled down by a weight. If the pull (traction) is consistent all over, you can easily calculate how much the cloth will feel that weight by multiplying the pull by the area it covers. However, if some corners were being pulled harder than others, you'd have to consider all those differences, complicating your calculations.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now, we do the Taylor’s expansion of the components of traction about the center of the cylindrical element. As only z coordinate has changed, the Taylor’s expansion will only have terms corresponding to derivatives of z.
In this chunk, we introduce Taylor's expansion to refine our traction components further. This mathematical approach allows us to approximate the behavior of our traction components, focusing solely on how they vary with changes in the z-coordinate. By doing so, we can carefully incorporate the effects of small changes without overcomplicating the analysis.
Consider how you might estimate the height of a tree branch as you climb higher. Initially, you can look at it directly, but as you go up step-by-step, you can use basic math to estimate how much higher you are, without needing to measure everything from the ground each time—this helps keep the process manageable.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Constant Traction Assumption: By assuming that traction is constant across the faces, we can directly multiply the traction value (at the center of the face) with the area of that face to get the total force.
Cylindrical Element: The cylindrical element's geometry is integral to analyzing forces acting along the z- and r- planes, simplifying equations derived from previous lectures.
Taylor Expansion: Despite the assumptions, we still apply Taylor’s expansion of traction components around the center to ensure we're aware of any variations, which ultimately confirms our simplification holds true.
This approach allows for a clearer view of how traction forces contribute to the linear momentum balance, which is vital in applications of mechanics.
In summary, this section lays a foundational understanding for analyzing stresses and forces in cylindrical coordinates, essential for future discussions about more complex systems.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
Assume a cylindrical element with a radius of 1m and height of 2m, applying a traction of 500 N/m². The area of the +z plane and -z plane can be calculated as A = 1 * 2 = 2 m², yielding a total force of 1000 N acting on both planes.
For a cylindrical system with variable radius, if tractions are 300 N/m² at r = 0.5m and 400 N/m² at r = 1m, using constant traction at r = 0.5m can simplify calculations despite ignoring variations.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
In cylindrical forms, traction stays, constant as we calculate with ease, simplifying our ways.
Imagine a tall cylindrical pizza. If you assume toppings cover it evenly without variation, you can easily determine how many slices it would yield by simply multiplying the area by the amount of toppings, without needing to measure each slice!
CAT: Constant Assumption for Traction helps us remember that assuming constant traction simplifies calculations.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Traction Force
Definition:
The force acting on a unit area of a surface or face in a material.
Term: Cylindrical Coordinate System
Definition:
A three-dimensional coordinate system defined by a radius, angle, and height.
Term: Taylor Expansion
Definition:
A mathematical series expansion that represents a function as the sum of its derivatives at a single point.
Term: Basis Vectors
Definition:
Vectors that define the coordinate system and are used to describe points in the system.
Term: Linear Momentum Balance (LMB)
Definition:
A principle used to describe the conservation of linear momentum in a given volume.