Practice Setting Up Mockito - 15.6.2 | 15. Unit Testing and Test-Driven Development (JUnit, Mockito) | Advance Programming In Java
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What is Mockito used for?

💡 Hint: Think about testing without the real objects.

Question 2

Easy

Name one build management system used in Java.

💡 Hint: Both of these help manage project dependencies.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What is the purpose of using Mockito in unit testing?

  • To enhance database performance
  • To create mock objects
  • To manage project dependencies

💡 Hint: Think about how we isolate tests.

Question 2

True or False: You need to manually manage all library dependencies without tools like Maven or Gradle.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Consider the organization of project libraries.

Solve and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Discuss what would happen if you attempted to run tests with Mockito without properly configuring the dependencies. What errors might you encounter?

💡 Hint: Consider the importance of environment setup in software development.

Question 2

Create a simple Java application refactoring the mock setup for multiple tests using Mockito. Explain the steps you take to ensure proper isolation of tests.

💡 Hint: Think about the lifecycle of tests and when mocks are created.

Challenge and get performance evaluation