Practice Prioritization Techniques - 15.4 | Product Backlog Management | Business Analysis
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What does the 'M' in MoSCoW stand for?

💡 Hint: Think about something critical for the product.

Question 2

Easy

Name one category from the Kano Model.

💡 Hint: These relate to customer satisfaction.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What is the primary focus of the MoSCoW method?

  • User satisfaction
  • Urgency and importance
  • Compliance with regulations

💡 Hint: Think about what needs to be completed first.

Question 2

True or False: The Kano Model categorizes features that might annoy users as Delighters.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Consider which categories contribute positively to satisfaction.

Solve 1 more question and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Given a list of features — user login, personalized dashboard, speed optimization, and auto-play videos — classify them using both MoSCoW and Kano methodologies, justifying each classification.

💡 Hint: Assess each feature's impact on usability and satisfaction.

Question 2

Create a detailed plan for a product backlog grooming session using prioritization techniques discussed. Outline how you would prepare and handle the session.

💡 Hint: Think about collaboration and how you can incorporate feedback.

Challenge and get performance evaluation