Role of Governors and President’s Rule
The role of Governors in the Indian political framework is complex and often contentious. Governors are appointed by the central government and are typically viewed as agents of central authority in the states, which can lead to tensions, especially when there is a divergence of political parties between the central and state governments. The section discusses the recommendations of the Sarkaria Commission, which was established to address concerns around the role of Governors, suggesting that their appointments should be non-partisan.
A significant aspect of governance is Article 356 of the Indian Constitution, which allows for the imposition of President's Rule in states when the government is unable to function according to constitutional provisions. This action leads to the central government taking control of state governance, which can stir up political disputes, particularly when actions seem to undermine elected governments. The historical context reveals cases such as the dismissal of the Kerala government in 1959, where President's Rule was invoked without clear justification.
The frequency of invoking President's Rule increased in the years following 1967 when non-Congress parties began to hold power in various states, leading to allegations of misuse of this provision by the central government to assert dominance. This section critically examines these dynamics and their impact on the federal structure in India.