Reform of Structures and Processes
The reform of international organizations, particularly the United Nations (UN), has become increasingly pressing in the wake of geopolitical shifts following the Cold War. The Security Council has been a focal point for reform discussions due to its original composition reflecting post-World War II realities, which no longer adequately represent the current geopolitical landscape. A resolution adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1992 highlighted three fundamental critiques: the Security Council's composition is outdated, its decisions reflect a limited range of interests, and it lacks equitable representation. Reform efforts aim to address these criticisms through various proposals, including increasing both permanent and non-permanent membership to better reflect contemporary global dynamics and promoting nations that can contribute positively to issues of peace and security.
India has positioned itself as a key player advocating for these reforms, emphasizing its large population and democratic foundation as justifications for permanent membership. However, proposals for reform also highlight complications, including the challenge of reaching consensus among existing powers and the broader international community's diverse interests. The UN's ongoing relevance in a unipolar world dominated by the US is also scrutinized, questioning whether it can effectively promote dialogue and counterbalance unilateral actions by major powers. Hence, the reform discourse continues to debate how the UN can adapt and remain pivotal amidst evolving global challenges.