7.4.2 - Group Polarisation
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Interactive Audio Lesson
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Introduction to Group Polarisation
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Today, we're diving into the concept of group polarisation. Can anyone tell me what that might mean?
Is it when a group becomes more extreme in their views after discussing things together?
Exactly! Group polarisation describes how group discussions can lead to members adopting more extreme positions than they started with. Would anyone like to provide an example of this?
Like how in a debate team, if everyone supports a strong argument, after discussing it, they all might feel even stronger about it?
Great example! This happens because of reinforcement from like-minded peers.
Mechanisms Behind Group Polarisation
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Now, let's explore why group polarisation occurs. One key reason is the bandwagon effect. Can anyone explain what that is?
Isn't it when people join in on a popular opinion just because others are?
Exactly! When you find that many people support your views, it can reinforce your beliefs, making them stronger. Does that make sense?
So, it feels like you're part of a group, and that makes your opinion feel more validated?
Correct! The validation from the group helps bolster individual opinions. This leads to greater agreement and sometimes more extreme positions.
Consequences of Group Polarisation
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Now, let's discuss the repercussions of group polarisation. Can anyone think of a negative outcome that might arise from this phenomenon?
What if a group makes an extreme decision that could be harmful?
Absolutely! For instance, a group may decide on harsh measures for punishment that don't reflect the severity of an individual's actions prior to discussion.
So, it can lead to bad decisions just because everyone is trying to prove they are more right than the others?
Exactly right! The pressure to conform can lead to decisions that lack moderation and can be quite dangerous.
Preventing Group Polarisation
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
To wrap up our discussion, what are some methods we can use to counteract group polarisation?
Maybe encouraging critical thinking or having someone play devil's advocate?
Yes! Encouraging dissenting opinions and ensuring diverse perspectives are part of the discussion can really help.
So, opening up the discussion can prevent everyone from just agreeing with each other?
Exactly! Group discussions should aim for a balance to avoid extreme outcomes.
Introduction & Overview
Read summaries of the section's main ideas at different levels of detail.
Quick Overview
Standard
This section explores the concept of group polarisation, which occurs when individuals within a group adopt stronger positions after discussions. It highlights the effects of group dynamics on decision-making and the mechanisms that lead to increased extremism in group attitudes.
Detailed
Group polarisation is a critical phenomenon in social psychology that occurs when individuals in a group converge towards a more extreme position than they initially held after discussing an issue. This section outlines how and why group processes can enhance existing opinions rather than fostering moderate or balanced views. When individuals engage with like-minded peers, they are likely to encounter affirmations of their beliefs, ultimately leading to stronger convictions. This process is often influenced by factors like the bandwagon effect, where the validation from peers leads individuals to feel that their views are more widely accepted. Additionally, the identification with the group intensifies members' commitment to shared beliefs.
Key Points:
- Polarisation Dynamics: Group discussions tend to lead members to support more extreme views, reflecting an enhancement of initial attitudes.
- Mechanisms at Play: Effective group dialogue can reinforce existing opinions through exposure to similar arguments, creating a bandwagon effect and social validation.
- Repercussions: The inclination towards more extreme decisions can have significant consequences, often leading groups to take positions that might be risky or unethical when individual opinion might suggest moderation.
Youtube Videos
Audio Book
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Understanding Group Polarisation
Chapter 1 of 3
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
We all know that important decisions are taken by groups and not by individuals alone. For example, a decision is to be taken whether a school has to be established in a village. Such a decision has to be a group decision. We have also seen that when groups take decisions, there is a fear that the phenomenon of groupthink may sometimes occur. Groups show another tendency referred to as ‘group polarisation’. It has been found that groups are more likely to take extreme decisions than individuals alone.
Detailed Explanation
Group polarisation means that after discussing an issue, group members often adopt a more extreme position than they held before the discussion. This can lead to decisions that are much stronger or more intense than what individuals might decide on their own. For example, if a group is deciding on the punishment for a colleague caught in wrongdoing, they might choose a harsher penalty after discussing rather than if an individual were to decide alone.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine a group of friends deciding on a restaurant. If they initially consider a casual dining spot but discuss, they might end up choosing a very expensive steakhouse instead, believing they should celebrate something special. The initial mild preference for casual dining now turns into a strong choice for high-end dining due to the influence of group discussion.
Reasons for Group Polarisation
Chapter 2 of 3
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
Suppose there is an employee who has been caught taking a bribe or engaging in some other unethical act. Her/his colleagues are asked to decide on what punishment s/he should be given. They may let her/him go scot-free or decide to terminate her/his services instead of imposing a punishment which may be commensurate with the unethical acts s/he had engaged in. Whatever the initial position in the group, this position becomes much stronger as a result of discussions in the group. This strengthening of the group’s initial position due to interaction and discussion is referred to as group polarisation.
Detailed Explanation
Group polarisation occurs for several reasons. When group members share their views, they may hear arguments that bolster their initial opinions, creating a more solidified stance. If the majority supports a specific view, individuals might feel a bandwagon effect, believing that this view represents the broader public opinion. Additionally, seeing their views reflected by others can enhance a sense of belonging to the group, convincing members that they are right in their stance, thus making their opinions more extreme.
Examples & Analogies
Consider a classroom debate about the welfares of capital punishment. If a student believes in capital punishment and discusses this with peers who share the same view, they may become even more convinced of that position after hearing others reinforce it. This could lead to a stronger collective opinion, pushing them towards more extreme positions than when they started.
Dangerous Repercussions of Group Polarisation
Chapter 3 of 3
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
This strengthening of the group’s initial position may sometimes have dangerous repercussions as groups may take extreme positions, i.e., from very weak to very strong decisions.
Detailed Explanation
The tendency of groups to arrive at more extreme viewpoints can lead to unjust or harmful outcomes. If a group veers towards extreme positions, it may overlook more balanced or reasonable solutions. This could have serious implications, for example, in legal or policy-making contexts where decisions affect many lives. When a group fails to consider the possible negative impacts of extreme decisions, it can lead to significant consequences.
Examples & Analogies
Think of a group of advisors to a government that decides on war. If everyone in the group believes war is necessary and they become more adamant about it after discussion, they may overlook diplomatic solutions. The initial mild reservations some advisers may have could fade into total agreement for warfare, leading to drastic implications for both nations involved due to the failure of more moderate discussions.
Key Concepts
-
Group Polarisation: The tendency of a group to make decisions more extreme than the initial inclination of its members.
-
Bandwagon Effect: The phenomenon where members push each other towards more extreme positions through social validation.
-
Ingroup vs Outgroup: Identification with one's group versus perceived differences with external groups.
Examples & Applications
In a debate setting, participants may begin with moderate views but, through discussion, strongly advocate for extreme positions.
In a team setting where teammates discuss their preferences passionately, they may end up favoring more radical strategies than initially planned.
Memory Aids
Interactive tools to help you remember key concepts
Rhymes
In a group we talk and feel, opinions change, that’s the deal!
Stories
Imagine a group of friends discussing what movie to watch; each friend's suggestion leads to the next one being more extreme, ultimately deciding on a horror film when they initially wanted to watch a light comedy.
Memory Tools
P.O.W.E.R. - Polarisation Often Weaken Egalitarian Resolve, to remember that group polarisation often leads to stronger opinions.
Acronyms
G.P.E. - Group Polarisation Effect
quick reminder of the intense effect of group dynamics.
Flash Cards
Glossary
- Group Polarisation
The tendency of group discussions to strengthen the initial opinions of group members.
- Bandwagon Effect
A phenomenon where individuals adopt beliefs or behaviors because others are doing so, leading to increased convergence of opinions.
- Social Validation
The process of individuals seeking affirmation of their thoughts and beliefs through the approval of their peers.
- Ingroup
A group that an individual identifies with, leading to stronger connections and shared beliefs.
- Outgroup
A group that an individual does not identify with, often perceived negatively.
Reference links
Supplementary resources to enhance your learning experience.