Sanskritisation, a term coined by sociologist M.N. Srinivas, refers to the process whereby lower caste groups or tribes adopt the customs, rituals, and ideologies of higher castes in order to improve their status. This phenomenon occurs primarily within the Hindu context but can extend to other religious groups as well. The process can lead to greater social standing for those who successfully adopt these customs. However, there are significant regional variations in how sanskritisation manifests, especially when dominant castes and their cultures overshadow others. Critics argue that sanskritisation does not effect structural change in society; rather, it allows some individuals to attain positional mobility while maintaining systemic inequalities. Furthermore, the process often leads to the imitation of upper caste practices, which can reinforce ideas of caste superiority and perpetuate existing societal inequities. With movements in the 20th century, particularly anti-Brahminical movements, many groups began rejecting Sanskrit models, asserting their own cultural identities. This section highlights the complexities of caste dynamics, the pursuit of social mobility through cultural assimilation, and the ongoing impact of colonialism on India's social structure.