5.3.2 - The Borders are Closed
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Interactive Audio Lesson
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Pastoralists Before Colonialism
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Can anyone tell me why nomadic pastoralists like the Maasai needed to move continuously?
To find fresh pastures and water for their animals!
Exactly! This movement allowed them to utilize different grazing grounds seasonally, which is vital for the health of their livestock. We can remember this as the 'MOVE' acronym: Movement for Opportunities, Vegetation, and Environment.
So, they had a flexible strategy to ensure that animals were well-fed and healthy?
Yes! This flexibility allowed them to avoid crises during droughts. Now, let’s explore how this changed under colonial rule.
Colonial Restrictions
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
What do you think happened to these pastoralist movements when colonial powers took over?
They probably lost their freedom to move around!
Correct! The colonial government imposed boundaries that restricted where they could go. These boundaries became their new 'borders', which they couldn't cross without permission. Why do you think that was?
To control them and their resources?
Exactly! Additionally, this control was rooted in the colonial belief that pastoralists were 'savage.' They thought that restricting movement would make countries easier to manage.
Impact of Drought
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
How do you think drought affected the Maasai once they were confined to reserves?
They couldn’t move to find food for their cattle, so many of them would starve.
Exactly, and a report from 1930 showed that half of their cattle perished during severe droughts due to not being able to access better pastures. This leads us to think about the importance of movement in their survival.
That sounds devastating. What did the pastoralists do to cope?
Great question! Some tried to reduce herd sizes due to lack of food, while others moved to find new grazing lands, even forming alliances with farmers for shared resources. Let’s summarize this: Pastoralists in crisis had to adapt, reduce herds, or forge new partnerships for survival.
Societal Shifts
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
The traditional structure of the Maasai society changed. Can anyone explain how?
The elders and warriors lost their power or changed roles during colonization?
Spot on! The British appointed chiefs who accrued wealth, altering the community's power balance. We can use the acronym 'POWER' to remember: Political Organization With Established Roles.
So the powerful got more powerful, and the poor struggled even more?
Yes! This division of wealth and the influence of colonial leadership disrupted traditional community life.
Introduction & Overview
Read summaries of the section's main ideas at different levels of detail.
Quick Overview
Standard
As colonial powers imposed boundaries and restrictions, pastoralists such as the Maasai faced significant challenges, losing access to traditional grazing lands and being confined to reserves, which adversely affected their ability to raise livestock and flourish economically.
Detailed
The Borders are Closed
In the nineteenth century, African pastoralists had the freedom to traverse vast areas seeking pastures for their herds. However, with the onset of colonial rule in the late nineteenth century, various restrictions were imposed on their movements, drastically altering their way of life.
Colonial governments viewed pastoralists like the Maasai as savage and imposed boundaries that confined them to designated reserves, prohibiting them from moving freely in search of pasture. The imposition of these restrictions not only affected pastoral activities but also their trading endeavors.
Traditionally, nomadism allowed pastoralists to adapt to changing environmental conditions, which was crucial during periods of drought. Yet, once restricted, their ability to move during arid conditions meant that livestock suffered significantly due to insufficient grazing. This led to considerable losses in livestock numbers, exacerbating economic hardships for such communities. Through specific laws, the colonial administration enacted measures that disconnect pastoralists from their lands, clearing the way for settler agriculture, and establishing a system that targeted their traditional mobility.
As a result, the pastoralists faced severe resource restrictions, changing their social structures and traditional ways of organizing. Overall, the colonial imposition of borders and regulations led to a decline in the pastoral lifestyle, highlighting a critical moment in the historical trajectory of pastoral communities in Africa.
Youtube Videos
Audio Book
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Colonial Restrictions on Mobility
Chapter 1 of 4
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
In the nineteenth century, African pastoralists could move over vast areas in search of pastures. When the pastures were exhausted in one place they moved to a different area to graze their cattle. From the late nineteenth century, the colonial government began imposing various restrictions on their mobility.
Detailed Explanation
Before colonial rule, African pastoralists roamed freely to ensure their cattle always had access to grazing areas. This nomadic lifestyle allowed them to adapt to the seasonal availability of pastures and water sources. However, with the onset of colonial governance in the late nineteenth century, various rules were instituted, confining these communities to specific territories. This dramatically altered their ability to move freely, which is essential for their pastoral way of life.
Examples & Analogies
Think of a student who typically moves from class to class, using different spaces for different subjects. Now imagine if the school principal suddenly said they could only study in one classroom all year. This would limit their learning and prevent them from using resources available in other areas, similar to how colonial rules restricted pastoralists from accessing necessary grazing lands.
Imposed Reserves and Permits
Chapter 2 of 4
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
Like the Maasai, other pastoral groups were also forced to live within the confines of special reserves. The boundaries of these reserves became the limits within which they could now move. They were not allowed to move out with their stock without special permits. And it was difficult to get permits without trouble and harassment.
Detailed Explanation
The colonial authorities created designated areas, or reserves, for pastoral communities. These reserves restricted the movement of pastoralists to specific regions. Pastoralists needed permits to leave their designated areas, but obtaining these permits often involved bureaucratic hurdles and harassment from officials. This further compounded their difficulties, as they could no longer follow traditional routes to find better pastures during dry seasons.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine a farmer who is told they can only grow crops in a small plot of land, while previously they had access to a large field. They face additional checks and have to ask for permission every time they want to expand their farm or sell their harvest at a distant market. This restriction would significantly affect their livelihood and ability to adapt to changes, just like the pastoralists in reserves.
Trade Limitations
Chapter 3 of 4
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
Pastoralists were also not allowed to enter the markets in white areas. In many regions, they were prohibited from participating in any form of trade. White settlers and European colonists saw pastoralists as dangerous and savage – people with whom all contact had to be minimised.
Detailed Explanation
During colonial rule, many pastoralists were barred from engaging in trade with white settlers. This prohibition on entering certain markets severely limited their economic opportunities. Trade was crucial for pastoralists because they exchanged animal products for goods they needed, like grains, tools, or clothing. The colonial perception of pastoralists as untrustworthy or savage led to these restrictions, further impoverishing these communities.
Examples & Analogies
It's like a talented artist living in a community where they are unable to sell their artwork because the local art gallery only accepts works from recognized artists or specific demographics, limiting their ability to earn a living and share their talent. Similarly, the pastoralists lost crucial markets for their goods.
Disruption of Traditional Livelihoods
Chapter 4 of 4
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
The new territorial boundaries and restrictions imposed on them suddenly changed the lives of pastoralists. This adversely affected both their pastoral and trading activities. Earlier, pastoralists not only looked after animal herds but traded in various products. The restrictions under colonial rule did not entirely stop their trading activities but they were now subject to various restrictions.
Detailed Explanation
Colonial policies disrupt the traditional lifestyles of pastoralists by limiting their movement and ability to trade. Previously, they could seamlessly integrate herding and trading, which supported their livelihoods. With the imposition of borders and restrictions, the pastoralists experienced a breakdown of their economic systems, leading to increased poverty and vulnerability.
Examples & Analogies
Consider a local baker who, previously free to sell bread at markets, is suddenly confined to their bakery with no ability to deliver to customers. This limits their sales and affects their ability to earn a livelihood, mirroring how pastoralists faced similar disruptions in their traditional practices.
Key Concepts
-
Colonial Restrictions: The limits placed on pastoralists by colonial governments greatly affected their mobility and livelihoods.
-
Drought Impact: Confinement due to colonialism led to insufficient resources during drought, resulting in livestock scarcity and death.
Examples & Applications
The Maasai traditionally moved with their livestock to find pastures, but after colonial restrictions, they were confined to certain areas, leading to severe losses during drought.
Colonial powers imposed systems that disrupted traditional leadership structures, causing wealth disparities among pastoralist communities.
Memory Aids
Interactive tools to help you remember key concepts
Rhymes
Pastoralists roam, searching for food, but colonial bounds change their mood.
Stories
Once, Maasai herders roamed free, sharing lands with their cattle and glee. When colonialists came, they drew borders tight, turning abundant pastures into helpless plight.
Memory Tools
Remember DRY PASTURE: Drought leads to Reduced livestock, Yield loss, Pastoral confine, Agricultural stress, Scarcity, Trade disrupted, Unstable economy, Resulting inequality, and Environment at risk.
Acronyms
USE P.A.S.T.O.R. to recall how pastoralists adapt
Use of resources
Seasonal movement
Trade modifications
Organizational change
Regulations
and Environmental adaptation.
Flash Cards
Glossary
- Pastoralists
People who rely on the herding of livestock for their livelihood.
- Nomadic
Living a life of moving from one place to another rather than settling permanently.
- Colonialism
The practice of acquiring control over another country or territory, often by force.
- Drought
A prolonged dry period without sufficient rainfall, impacting water supplies and agricultural production.
Reference links
Supplementary resources to enhance your learning experience.