Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skillsβperfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
Youβve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
After World War I, India experienced significant economic changes. Can anyone explain how these changes affected the Indian population?
The war increased taxes and prices dramatically, which hit the common people hard.
Exactly! The drastic increase in prices, nearly doubling between 1913 and 1918, caused great hardship. Let's remember this with the acronym PRICES: Price Rise Induces Collective Economic Struggle.
What did people do as a result of these hardships?
Many turned toward unity against colonial power, as the shared oppression created a collective identity. Who can tell me about the specific events that sparked initial conflicts?
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
Gandhi introduced the idea of Satyagraha. What do you think Satyagraha means?
It means 'truth force' and emphasizes non-violent resistance.
Right! It is the belief that moral power can defeat unjust laws without resorting to violence. Think of 'TRUTH' as a mnemonic β Teach, Resist, Understand, Teach honesty.
How did Gandhi apply this in India?
He mobilized masses through various forms of non-violent protests. For instance, can anyone recall how his earlier experiences in South Africa shaped his strategies?
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
What was the Rowlatt Act of 1919 and why was it significant?
It allowed the government to arrest people without trial and led to protests across India.
Very good! This fueled widespread anger and led to events like the Jallianwala Bagh massacre. Remember the term Jallianwala with JA for Just Actions killed, resulting in L for Long-lasting outrage!
Wow! It really seems like this incident changed how people viewed the British.
Indeed! It shifted many Indians' perspectives, igniting a desire for freedom.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
The Non-Cooperation Movement was a response to colonial oppression. Who can discuss how various groups participated?
The middle class was heavily involved, especially students and lawyers who boycotted British institutions.
Excellent! The middle class was essential in setting the stage. Can someone remember how these groups viewed Swaraj?
To them, Swaraj meant self-rule and the end of British control.
Exactly! This idea created a strong unifying thread that connected disparate groups under the same cause. Think of 'UNITY' β Understanding, New Ideas, Togetherness, Yielding toward national freedom.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
Let's talk about the Salt March. Why was it a vital event in the Civil Disobedience Movement?
It symbolized a collective challenge against British laws regarding salt.
Exactly! The March was more than just about salt; it showed India's resilience and unity. Remember: 'SALT' β Symbol of Assertive Liberty through Timed action.
Did it have any significant impact afterward?
Certainly! It galvanized masses, leading to widespread participation in civil disobedience across India, showcasing the power of mass mobilization.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section discusses the significant events leading up to the Civil Disobedience Movement, emphasizing Mahatma Gandhi's concept of satyagraha, the political climate after World War I, and the widespread mobilization against colonial laws like the Rowlatt Act, culminating in the Salt March and the quest for total independence.
The section 'Towards Civil Disobedience' explores the trajectory of nationalism in India from the aftermath of World War I, illustrating how economic hardships sparked a collective consciousness among Indians against colonial rule.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
In February 1922, Mahatma Gandhi decided to withdraw the Non-Cooperation Movement. He felt the movement was turning violent in many places and satyagrahis needed to be properly trained before they would be ready for mass struggles. Within the Congress, some leaders were by now tired of mass struggles and wanted to participate in elections to the provincial councils that had been set up by the Government of India Act of 1919.
In February 1922, Mahatma Gandhi made the decision to end the Non-Cooperation Movement. This choice stemmed from increasing violence within the movement, which worried him. Gandhi believed that the participants, called satyagrahis, should be better prepared and trained to engage in mass struggles effectively. Within the Indian National Congress, there was a divide in opinions; some leaders desired to transition from protests to participating in elections established by colonial legislation, feeling it was crucial to challenge British policies from within the institutional framework.
Imagine a sports team training for a big game. If the players start making mistakes that could lead to injuries or defeat, the coach might decide to pause their participation to provide better training before they face serious competition. Similarly, Gandhi thought it wise to slow down and prepare before pushing further in the fight for independence.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Against this backdrop, the new Tory government in Britain constituted a Statutory Commission under Sir John Simon. Set up in response to the nationalist movement, the commission was to look into the functioning of the constitutional system in India and suggest changes. The problem was that the commission did not have a single Indian member. They were all British.
To address the growing demands from the nationalist movement, the British government formed the Simon Commission to review the political system in India and recommend reforms. However, a major point of contention was that this commission had no Indian representatives, which angered many Indians who felt that their voices were excluded from the process that would significantly impact their governance.
Think of a school board meeting where decisions affecting students are made, but none of the students are allowed to attend or contribute. How would that make the students feel? This situation mirrors how Indians reacted to the Simon Commission; they felt overlooked and disrespected.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Mahatma Gandhi found in salt a powerful symbol that could unite the nation. On 31 January 1930, he sent a letter to Viceroy Irwin stating eleven demands. Some of these were general interest; others were specific demands of different classes, from industrialists to peasants. The most stirring of all was the demand to abolish the salt tax.
Gandhi identified salt as a potent symbol of oppression because it was a basic necessity for all people, rich and poor alike. In January 1930, he presented eleven demands to the British Viceroy, including the abolition of the salt tax, which taxed the production and sale of salt, making it a significant issue for most Indians. This demand was aimed at showcasing the unfairness of colonial rule, and it rallied people from various backgrounds to join the movement focused on civil disobedience.
Consider a situation where a government imposes a tax on something essential like water. People would likely unite and protest against this unfair treatment, recognizing how much they all rely on water. By focusing on salt, Gandhi tapped into a universal need, bringing diverse groups together to challenge authority.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
On 6 April he reached Dandi, and ceremonially violated the law, manufacturing salt by boiling sea water. This marked the beginning of the Civil Disobedience Movement. People were now asked not only to refuse cooperation with the British, as they had done in 1921-22, but also to break colonial laws.
Gandhi's Salt March to Dandi was a pivotal act of civil disobedience that symbolized the refusal to obey unjust laws. Arriving at Dandi on April 6, he openly defied British regulations by producing salt from seawater. This act was not a mere symbolic gesture; it ignited widespread participation across India, as citizens from various walks of life began to openly challenge British authority by breaking salt laws and engaging in other forms of civil resistance.
Imagine a group of friends deciding to stop following a rule they believe is unfair, like a school dress code that restricts personal expression. They show solidarity by wearing their favorite clothes on a designated day. The Salt March served a similar purpose on a larger scaleβGandhi's act inspired thousands to join the fight against colonial laws.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Worried by the developments, the colonial government began arresting the Congress leaders one by one. This led to violent clashes in many places. A frightened government responded with a policy of brutal repression.
As the Civil Disobedience Movement gained momentum, the British colonial authorities became increasingly anxious and began arresting key Congress leaders to stifle the movement. This heavy-handed approach often resulted in violent clashes between protesters and the police. In response, the government employed brutal tactics to intimidate and suppress dissent, further escalating tensions across the country.
Think about how a school might unfairly punish a group of students protesting for their rights by suspending their leaders. This reaction typically only strengthens the resolve of the protesters. The British governmentβs response to the active civil disobedience stirred even more public outcry against their oppressive tactics.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Let us now look at the different social groups that participated in the Civil Disobedience Movement. Why did they join the movement? What were their ideals? What did swaraj mean to them?
The Civil Disobedience Movement saw participation from various social groups, each with distinct motivations and interpretations of swaraj, or self-rule. Wealthier peasants fought for better prices and lower taxes. In contrast, poorer farmers wanted fair rent and relief from debt. Industrialists sought to expand their businesses, while workers found reason to join in the struggle for fair wages and rights. Women also played an increasingly visible role in protests, reflecting a broader aspiration for equality and change.
Imagine a community coming together to advocate for a new park. Families may join because they want space for children, while others hope for a jogging trail, and some seek a community gathering spot. Each groupβs desire and perspective add richness to the movement. Similarly, the diverse motives for participating in the Civil Disobedience Movement show how various Indian communities sought swaraj in ways that reflected their unique challenges and aspirations.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Satyagraha: A philosophy of non-violent resistance emphasizing truth as a force for social change.
Rowlatt Act: A deeply unpopular law that allowed the government to suppress dissent and angered the Indian populace.
Civil Disobedience: The act of refusing to comply with certain laws to protest against governmental policies.
Salt March: A major protest led by Gandhi to defy the salt tax, symbolizing Indian unity against British rule.
Non-Cooperation Movement: A strategic withdrawal of support from British institutions by diverse Indian groups.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
The Jallianwala Bagh massacre served as a turning point that unified various Indian groups against British rule.
Gandhi's Salt March demonstrated the power of peaceful protest, leading to widespread participation across social classes.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
In every heart, the truth should reign, Satyagraha is our non-violent gain.
A young boy in India hears stories of bravery as people protest against the salt tax, leading him to explore the meaning of freedom.
Use the acronym 'PRICES': Price Rise Induces Collective Economic Struggle to remember post-war economic changes.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Satyagraha
Definition:
A philosophy of non-violent resistance proposed by Mahatma Gandhi, emphasizing the power of truth.
Term: Rowlatt Act
Definition:
A law that allowed the British government to arrest individuals without trial, leading to public outrage.
Term: Civil Disobedience
Definition:
A form of protest where individuals refuse to obey certain laws, demands, and commands of a government, typically in a non-violent manner.
Term: Salt March
Definition:
A major non-violent protest against the British salt tax led by Gandhi in 1930, symbolizing the fight for independence.
Term: NonCooperation Movement
Definition:
A campaign initiated by Gandhi, encouraging Indians to withdraw their cooperation from British governance and institutions.