Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skillsβperfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
Youβve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take mock test.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
In 'Poets and Pancakes', Asokamitran provides a satirical look into Gemini Studios, depicting the behind-the-scenes life of the Indian film industry in the 1950s. Through humorous observations, particularly on the makeup department and characters like Subbu and the visiting poet Stephen Spender, the essay critiques the superficiality and hierarchical structure of the film industry.
Asokamitran's 'Poets and Pancakes' is a humorous and insightful exploration of the Indian film industry, particularly focusing on his experiences at Gemini Studios in Chennai during the 1950s. Through his role as a clippings editor, Asokamitran documents the eccentric personalities and peculiarities prevalent in the studio environment.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Asokamitran's essay offers significant social commentary on the film industry of the 1950s:
- Hierarchical Structure: The clear hierarchy within the studio, from the boss to Subbu, down to the makeup department and the author himself, is evident.
In the film industry depicted in Asokamitran's essay, there exists a well-defined hierarchy. At the top is the boss, who holds the most power and decision-making ability. Below him, Subbu, the second in command, navigates the studio politics and supports the boss. The people working in the makeup department and the author, who occupies a lower rung in this structure, illustrate this hierarchy. This structure highlights the ways in which power is distributed, showing that those with less direct influence often feel overlooked in the creative process.
Think of a sports team: the coach is at the top and makes the strategic decisions. Below the coach are the assistant coaches, and then players vary from starters to benchwarmers. Each person's influence and importance varies, just as different roles in the film studio contribute to the final production, with some being more central than others.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
The Power of Flattery: Subbu's rise exemplifies how sycophancy and loyalty could be more valued than genuine talent in certain contexts.
Subbu, a central character at Gemini Studios, showcases how ingratiating oneself to those in power can sometimes yield greater rewards than talent alone. While many within the studio are skilled in their roles, Subbu's constant flattery and subservience to the boss help him secure a prominent position. This reflects a common theme in workplace environments where loyalty and sycophancy can overshadow actual capability or creativity, leading to resentment among those who feel overlooked.
Imagine a work setting where an employee consistently praises their boss excessively while their colleagues, who may have better ideas and skills, are ignored. This behavior can lead to the flatterer gaining promotions and recognition, while more deserving coworkers are sidelined. It mirrors the dynamics seen with Subbu where his value lies more in his allegiance than his artistic contributions.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Superficiality: The essay hints at the superficiality of the glamour world, where appearances are paramount (e.g., the makeup), and engagement with profound ideas (like the MRA or Spender's poetry) is often superficial.
Asokamitran uses humor and satire to reveal the superficial nature of the film industry during the 1950s. The makeup department, where actors are made to appear glamorous, serves as a metaphor for the industry's emphasis on looks rather than substance. Even when serious organizations like the Moral Re-Armament attempt to engage with the studio, their interactions are dismissed as mere spectacle rather than genuine engagement with moral issues. This critique underscores how the entertainment business often prioritizes image over meaningful discourse.
Consider popular reality TV shows where the focus is on dramatic appearances and sensationalism rather than raw talent or deep insight. Participants may look glamorous, but the substance of their stories or morals can often seem hollow, paralleling the limitations of the film industry's engagement with serious themes.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Cultural Disconnect: The bewildered reaction to Stephen Spender's lecture highlights the gap between commercial entertainment (films) and intellectual pursuits (literature).
The visit of the English poet Stephen Spender to Gemini Studios further illustrates a notable cultural disconnect between the world of cinema and serious literature. The audience finds themselves confused and unable to engage with Spender's abstract ideas and sophisticated language, revealing the differing priorities and understandings within these two realms. While the film industry is focused on entertainment and profitability, literature often demands a deeper intellectual engagement that may not resonate with all audiences present.
Think about a music festival where some attendees enjoy popular music while others are at a poetry reading in a nearby tent. The pop music audience may struggle to connect with the deeply introspective themes of the poetry, leading to confusion and disengagement. Similarly, Spender's literary insights fail to strike a chord with the studio staff, leading to that pronounced gap between the two worlds.