Practice ASCII and EBCDIC - 9.2.1 | 9. Floating Point Number Representation | Computer Organisation and Architecture - Vol 1
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What does ASCII stand for?

💡 Hint: It's an encoding standard for representing characters.

Question 2

Easy

What bit representation does ASCII use?

💡 Hint: Think about how many characters it represents.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What is the maximum number of characters ASCII can represent?

  • 128
  • 256
  • 512

💡 Hint: Think about what '7 bits' allows.

Question 2

EBCDIC is an encoding standard primarily used for which operating system?

  • Windows
  • Linux
  • IBM mainframes

💡 Hint: Remember where EBCDIC originated!

Solve 2 more questions and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Given a string that includes accented letters and symbols, discuss how you would ensure compatibility across different systems using character encoding. Which standards would you choose and why?

💡 Hint: Think about the limitations of older encoding systems.

Question 2

Explore the impact of shifting from EBCDIC to Unicode for a software application that previously depended heavily on EBCDIC. What considerations must be made during this transition?

💡 Hint: Consider the technical adjustments required when changing foundational structures.

Challenge and get performance evaluation