Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today we begin our journey into understanding thrashing, a situation where the operating system spends too much time on page swapping rather than executing processes. A major factor contributing to this problem is Belady's anomaly. Can anyone tell me what they think Belady's anomaly refers to?
Is it when increasing frames leads to more page faults?
Exactly! When the number of page frames increases, you might find that page faults also increase. For instance, using a FIFO policy, the page fault count can actually rise with more frames under certain conditions.
So how does that happen?
Great question! The pages in memory at a given moment with fewer frames aren't necessarily a subset of pages that are in memory with more frames. This leads us to the core of our discussion on page faults and memory management.
What are the implications of having too many page faults?
When page faults are excessive, the system is said to be thrashing, which severely degrades performance. Memory management strategies must consider these factors to optimize page usage.
So, can we reduce thrashing somehow?
Absolutely! Techniques like the Optimal algorithm and LRU prevent thrashing and minimize page faults by retaining the most relevant pages in memory. Let's dive into those strategies in our next session.
Let's consider the memory reference string 1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 2, 5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 with both 3 and 4 frames. How many page faults occur in each case says, Student_1?
With 3 frames, I think we observed 9 page faults.
Exactly! And with 4 frames?
That would be 10 page faults, right?
Correct! This example clearly illustrates Belady's anomaly in action. It happened because 5, 1, 2 is not a subset of 5, 2, 3, 4. Any ideas on how we might avoid this situation?
Using better algorithms could help, like optimal or LRU!
Yes! Both algorithms retain the most relevant pages and do not exhibit the anomaly. Let’s review more about LRU in the next session.
Today, we'll focus on how different page replacement algorithms like Optimal and LRU can help alleviate thrashing. Who remembers how LRU works?
LRU keeps track of the least recently used pages and replaces them when a page fault occurs, right?
That’s right! Which means it always tries to replace the pages that are least likely to be used again. How does this help maintain efficiency?
It helps ensure that the most relevant pages stay in memory, reducing page faults.
Correct! Similarly, the Optimal algorithm tries to predict which pages will be used next and retains those in memory. Can we summarize why both methods are effective?
They both reduce the chances of thrashing by keeping the most relevant pages in memory at all times!
Exactly! Therefore, implementing these algorithms is crucial for efficient memory management. Let's wrap up with today's key points.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
This section explores thrashing, its causes, specifically Belady's anomaly, and how various page replacement algorithms can affect system performance during memory management. It emphasizes the implications of inadequate frame allocation and discusses optimal and LRU strategies that mitigate Belady's anomaly.
Thrashing is an issue prevalent in operating system management of memory, occurring when a program spends more time paging than executing, drastically slowing down system performance. It is associated with a high rate of page faults, which can overwhelm the CPU.
At the core of thrashing is the concept known as Belady's anomaly, which refers to a counterintuitive situation where increasing the number of page frames results in an increase in the number of page faults. This happens because the pages present in memory at any time for a fixed number of frames may not be a subset of pages available when the number of frames is increased.
In a provided reference string of memory accesses (1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 2, 5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5), various page replacement algorithms exhibit differing levels of efficiency. Using FIFO (First-In-First-Out) policy and examining with 3 and 4 frames demonstrates that while running with 3 frames incurs 9 page faults, using 4 frames ironically produces an even higher page fault count of 10. The reason is that the specific set of pages in memory depends on the number of frames available, resulting in the non-subset scenario that triggers the anomaly.
Thrashing can be prevented by employing effective page replacement strategies. The Optimal algorithm and Least Recently Used (LRU) algorithm do not exhibit Belady's anomaly since both mechanisms ensure that the pages retained in memory at any instance are the most relevant. The Optimal algorithm focuses on keeping pages that are most recently accessed, while LRU does the same but reflects access patterns in the past.
In addressing memory management, it's essential that adequate frames are allocated to each process to prevent thrashing and maximize performance.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now we will try to see in more detail why this happens? Now the reason for Belady’s anomaly has been found to be this; pages in memory at any given time for the stipulated number of frames is not always a subset of the pages when the number of frames become higher. So, why does Belady’s anomaly happen? Because, suppose I have 3 frames, at any given time the num, the frames the pages that are there in memory is not a subset of the of the pages that are there when my number of number of frames are higher.
Belady's anomaly illustrates a counterintuitive situation in computing where increasing the number of page frames leads to an increase in page faults. This happens because the pages loaded into memory with a lower number of frames do not necessarily overlap with the pages that would be loaded with a higher number of frames. Essentially, when there are fewer frames, certain pages are kept in memory, but when additional frames are provided, the selection of pages may change in such a way that leads to more page faults. This anomaly is often encountered in page replacement algorithms, particularly under FIFO (First-In-First-Out) policies.
Imagine a library with a limited number of tables (frames) for reading. If you only have three tables, only a few people (pages) can read at the same time. But if you add more tables, you might find that people prefer to use new tables without considering who was already there. This might actually prevent some regular readers from getting their favorite spots back, leading to more people getting frustrated and leaving without reading (i.e., more page faults).
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
We will take an example we will take the example of this reference string and see why and how this happens. So, these are the set of memory references and these are the set of memory references shown here, 1 2 3 4 1 2 5 1 2 3 4 5. So, these are the references shown here.
In this section, we analyze a specific reference string of page requests to understand page faults. The reference string is: 1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 2, 5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. Each number corresponds to a specific page request over time, and we can track how many times we encounter 'misses' (when a page is not found in memory) and 'hits' (when a page is found in memory) as we simulate loading these pages into different numbers of frames. For instance, with 3 frames, every new unique page requested leads to page faults until the old pages are replaced based on the FIFO policy.
Think of it like students trying to visit a computer lab. With only three computers (frames), each new student (page number) who arrives causes a wait if none of them are available. If a new student arrives while all computers are occupied, they must replace the oldest user who had been using that computer the longest. In this scenario, if new computers are added but the pool of active students changes, some might find they have to wait longer due to an increase in new requests.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now at time 0, so this 1 is time 0 time 1 time 2 first reference second reference third difference fourth reference like this. So, ref #; this one is 1 2 3 4 like this it progresses so, at the first reference. So, I am bringing in page number page 1 to frame 1 and what happens is that it comes to frame 1 and frame 2, and frame 3 are empty. So, there is a page fault; there then 2 comes in and goes to the second empty frame, the frame 2 is empty and 2 goes here...
This section provides a timeline of how pages are loaded into memory over time, specifically tracking when page faults occur. It begins with the first page request, which obviously results in a page fault because the frame is empty. As more requests come in, pages may be replaced under the FIFO policy. The number of page faults can be tallied to demonstrate that with fewer frames, the total number of page faults can be greater compared to having more frames available, thereby illustrating Belady's anomaly.
Consider a chef preparing dishes. In the beginning, they only have three pots (frames) to cook with; each new ingredient they need causes complications as they must replace someone else's dish. If more pots are added, they can cook more ingredients simultaneously, but if certain dishes are not planned, they may still end up overcooking (or missing the right combinations) due to unanticipated ingredient requests.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now, when I have 4 frames in memory these are the set of accesses. Now, what has happened? See so, 1 comes in miss, 2 comes in miss, 3 comes in miss, 4 comes in miss, then 1 comes in 1 is a hit because it is already there...
In this section, we shift from analyzing 3 frames to 4 frames, tracking how the number of available frames influences the occurrence of hits and misses. It becomes apparent that the overall page faults decrease when more frames are used, but interestingly enough, there are instances where previously accessible pages result in misses due to memory reallocations. By contrasting the two scenarios, we can better understand how generous or limited the frame allocation can lead to increased efficiency or the potential pitfalls of memory use.
Imagine a visual artist with multiple canvases (frames) to work on. With poor space, they can only finish three paintings at a time, which often leads to struggles when new inspirations arise. But with additional canvases, they can explore all inspirations without losing track of existing paintings, albeit if the viewing order is altered, they may still lose some. The organization and resource availability fundamentally change their efficiency.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now, we see that when you have 3 frames in memory, when you have 3 frames in memory the number of page faults are 9; you have 3 hits ok. And when you have 4 frames in memory, you have you have only 2 hits. So, therefore, you have 10 page faults, here you have 9 faults and here you have 10 faults.
This concluding section synthesizes the evidence presented earlier regarding the impact of frame numbers on page faults. It highlights the pivotal finding that increasing frames doesn't always equate to fewer faults due to the peculiarity of memory management policies. Understanding this contrast is crucial as it informs decisions regarding memory allocation and management strategies in computing systems.
Returning to our library analogy, if initially three readers contributed to a quieter environment with fewer disturbances, upon adding more rooms (frames), the chances of losing track of borrowed books due to higher demands emerge, demonstrating how excess capacity can lead to inefficiency rather than operational ease.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Thrashing: Excessive page faults leading to degraded performance.
Belady's Anomaly: Increasing page frames can paradoxically increase page faults.
Page Fault: Occurs when accessing a non-loaded page.
Optimal Algorithm: Retains pages that will not be used for the longest time.
Least Recently Used (LRU): Replaces the least recently accessed page.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
In a reference string of 1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 2, 5, using 3 frames incurs 9 page faults, while 4 frames results in 10 page faults due to Belady's anomaly.
Using LRU, if pages are accessed in the order 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 4, 3 with space for 2 frames, the page 4 will replace the least recently used page in memory.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
Thrashing makes your system crash, when pages swap, no time to splash!
Imagine a library where too many books are borrowed and never returned, leaving more books off the shelf, indicating how thrashing works.
TAP for thrashing: Too Many Access Pages!
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Thrashing
Definition:
A condition where a computer's operating system spends the majority of its time swapping data between RAM and disk, significantly degrading performance.
Term: Belady's Anomaly
Definition:
A phenomenon where increasing the number of page frames results in more page faults rather than fewer.
Term: Page Fault
Definition:
An event that occurs when a program attempts to access a page that is not currently in memory.
Term: Optimal Algorithm
Definition:
A page replacement strategy that replaces the page that will not be used for the longest period of time in the future.
Term: Least Recently Used (LRU)
Definition:
A page replacement algorithm that removes the least recently used page from memory when a new page needs to be loaded.