Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today, we're discussing page replacement schemes. Can anyone tell me why we need page replacement?
Because the physical memory has a limited capacity, right?
Exactly! When we run out of space, we need to replace the pages in memory. One way to do this is through algorithms like FIFO, LRU, and others.
What's LRU again?
LRU stands for Least Recently Used; it replaces the page that hasn't been accessed for the longest time.
How does a counter-based solution help with LRU?
Great question! A counter-based solution tracks the last access time of each page by assigning a tick or time stamp each time a page is accessed. This way, we can determine which page to replace when memory is full.
So basically, we're trying to keep track of usage!
Exactly! We want to maintain pages that are frequently accessed. Let's summarize: Counter-based LRU tracks access time, allowing us to replace the least used page effectively.
Now, let's talk about a stack-based implementation for LRU. Who can explain how stacks work?
Isn't it like a pile where you can only remove the top item?
Correct! In our case, each time we access a page, we move it to the top of the stack. The bottom of the stack will then represent the least recently used page to replace.
That sounds practical. But what if we need to frequently update the stack?
Good point! Frequent updates can become resource-intensive; hence, we need to implement efficient data structures. It's crucial because memory accesses happen constantly.
Is the stack-based method always the best?
Not really, that's why approximations like using reference bits have been developed. Let's not forget LRU's implementation challenges.
Can you summarize the stack method?
Certainly! The stack method records page accesses with the most recent on top, letting us pick the least recently used page efficiently for replacement.
Next, we should discuss how we can approximate LRU. Why is it necessary?
Because implementing true LRU is expensive and requires support we might not always have?
Absolutely! One method is to use a reference bit that tells us whether a page was accessed recently during a time epoch. Can anyone explain how we handle this?
We set the reference bit to 1 if the page is accessed and clear it after each epoch?
Exactly! This helps determine which pages to consider replacing. What about sampled LRU?
Is that measuring reference bits over a period and storing them?
That's right! By averaging specific reference history over time, we can reduce the overhead while maintaining a reasonable approximation of LRU.
To sum this up, approximations help us achieve efficiency without heavy resource consumption?
Exactly! In summary, approximating LRU is crucial for efficient memory management while reducing system overhead.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
In this section, various methods to implement page replacement, particularly through counter and stack-based solutions, are detailed. The practical disadvantages of these methods lead to approximations like the reference bit and sampled LRU.
This section focuses on the implementation of the Least Recently Used (LRU) page replacement algorithm within memory management. LRU aims to replace the page that has not been accessed for the longest time. Due to hardware limitations, implementing true LRU requires additional support. Thus, two primary counter-based methods emerge: a hardware clock ticks method and a stack-based approach.
Through these methods, page replacement policies aim to improve overall system efficiency and reduce page faults.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, consider the reference string 2 0 1 6 4 2 0 1 6 4 0 1 0 3 1 2 1. Now here I have 4 page frames, let us say my physical memory only has 4 page frames available and these are the set of memory accesses. So, initially, there is nothing in the physical memory. So, the first 4 misses are compulsory misses and. So, I bring in 0 2 1 6, 0 2 1 6 missed.
This chunk introduces the concept of page frames and memory reference. It discusses a concrete example with the reference string '2 0 1 6 4 2 0 1 6 4 0 1 0 3 1 2 1', which entails accessing memory locations. In the beginning, there are no pages in memory, so the first four access requests (to page 0, 2, 1, and 6) cause compulsory page faults, meaning these pages are not present in memory and must be loaded. First accesses are essentially 'misses' because they require loading pages into memory for the first time.
Think of memory as a library. If a customer asks for a book that's not on the shelf (the library’s physical memory), the librarian must fetch it from the storage room (loading it into memory). The first time someone requests those books, they're like compulsory 'misses' because they have to go find them.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now, 0 is accessed again, now 0 is not there in the physical memory. So, 0 will again lead to another page fault and. So, whom will it replace 2 is now the oldest one which came into memory. So, 0 replaces 2.
This section explains how page replacement works when a page that was previously loaded is accessed again. Since page 0 is not currently in memory (it was replaced by page 2), accessing page 0 triggers another page fault. According to the FIFO (First In, First Out) principle, the oldest page in memory (page 2) is replaced by page 0.
Let's continue with our library analogy. If a reader wants to revisit a book that was returned, but the library has given that space to a new book, they'll have to return the new book and fetch the old one from the back. Here, the old book is '2', and the librarian decides to return it to replace '2' with '0', the requested book.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now, 1 comes again this one does not result in a miss this one is already there in main memory. And this is not a miss, then 0 this also does not incur a miss 0 is already there in memory, it does not incur a miss then 3 is accessed when 3 is accessed 3 is not there in physical memory whom will it replace? It will replace the oldest one because 0 2 1 6 was the order 0 and 2 has already been replaced. So, now, the oldest is to 1. So, 3 replaces 1.
In this chunk, we see how subsequent memory accesses affect the page fault rate and memory state. When page 1 is requested, it is already in memory (not a miss). The same is true for page 0. However, when page 3 is requested, it is missing, leading another page fault. According to FIFO, page 1 (the oldest) is replaced by page 3. This section demonstrates how pages are managed in physical memory, showcasing how often some pages are accessed compared to others.
Imagine a busy library where some popular books remain in constant circulation while others have gone out for some time. When a reader comes back for a popular book (like '1'), it’s already shelved—no new borrowing happens. But when they ask for a book that’s borrowed (like '3'), it replaces the least borrowed '1' so the preferred book can be retrieved.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, I had 12 different strings of length 12. So, I have 12 mem references out of 12 references nine resulted in a fault 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9; 9 resulted in a fault. So, the fault rate is 9 by 12 or 0.75.
The computation of how many page faults occurred gives us an insight into the performance of the memory management system. In this reference string of length 12, 9 are counted as faults, giving a fault rate of 0.75 (or 75%), meaning that 75% of memory attempts resulted in pages needing to be loaded into memory. Understanding the fault rate is crucial for evaluating the effectiveness of memory management strategies.
Returning to our library scenario, if a reader frequently asks for 12 books but only 3 are readily available, it causes 9 disappointments—a 75% ‘failure rate’ of quickly fetching desired books indicates a need to keep more popular volumes on hand!
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
FIFO although is very simple, I find out the oldest page in memory and replace it, this is the algorithm, it’s a poor replacement policy why it evicts the oldest page in the system and it does not take care whether this page is being heavily used currently or not.
The FIFO replacement algorithm, while straightforward, lacks sophistication since it only considers the age of a page instead of its usage frequency. This can lead to situations where a page that is still frequently accessed is replaced simply because it was loaded first. The inherent limitation of not accounting for usage patterns makes FIFO a less efficient method compared to others.
Consider a library that always shelves books in a straight line, oldest first. If a new book continuously replaces an
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Before proceeding to the next actual algorithm we will we will go into a hypothetical actual algorithm which actually can cannot exist in practice, but is used as a measure of comparison for all other algorithms.
The optimal page replacement algorithm is discussed as the ideal standard for measuring the effectiveness of other algorithms. This algorithm theoretically replaces the page that will not be accessed for the longest time in the future. However, it is impractical as it requires foreknowledge of future accesses.
Imagine a future prediction tool that can tell a librarian which books will be less popular next Wednesday; it would let them perfectly optimize their shelves. Unfortunately, such crystal balls don’t exist, making it a theoretical ideal rather than a practical approach.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, if we take the same set of 12 reference strings what happens is that this first 4 will still incur a miss because these are compulsory this is compulsory this is compulsory.
By using the same reference string with the optimal algorithm, we can analyze its performance. The first four page accesses are compulsory misses, just as before. However, after this, the optimal algorithm handles page replacements differently by choosing pages that will not be needed for the longest time, leading to fewer page faults compared to FIFO.
In our library, if the librarian knows which books won't be checked out after today (but can't predict past requests), they could choose to replace the least popular book with one nobody will borrow for a while, minimizing dissatisfaction.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Then we come to the next algorithm as its, it’s a very popular algorithm; however, due to the problems with this implementation various approximations of the algorithm is used.
LEU is another strategy that improves upon FIFO by replacing the page that hasn’t been used for the longest period. This algorithm is more efficient as it better utilizes recently accessed page information. However, it poses challenges in practice, often requiring special hardware to track access time.
In a library, this is like a librarian who decides to keep the least borrowed books for the longest time on the shelf. If a book goes untouched for a while, it is removed in favor of a current favorite, reflecting real usage patterns better than simply letting age determine availability.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now, we take the same reference string again same set of 12 references on this the first 4 are again compulsory, these are compulsory, these are compulsory and then the fourth one replaces whom the fourth one replaces.
This section highlights the challenges in implementing LRU without proper hardware that can track access time for each page. The counter-based solution relies on a hardware clock that ticks with every memory reference, marking the access time for each page to facilitate the selection of pages to replace based on how long ago they were referenced.
Imagine the library setting up a system that records the last time each book was checked out. So as new books come in, they can easily identify which book has stayed the longest without being borrowed.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Page Replacement: The process of swapping out a memory page for another page when needed.
Least Recently Used: A memory management policy replacing the oldest unused page.
Counter-based Solution: A method of tracking the last usage time through tick counts on page access.
Stack-based Solution: Maintaining a history of accesses in a stack to determine which page to replace.
Reference Bit: A method of marking pages that have been accessed recently.
Sampled LRU: An approximation where actual accesses are recorded periodically, reducing system overhead.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
Using a counter-based solution, every time a page is accessed, the associated tick is updated, allowing for efficient tracking of usage.
In the stack-based solution, when accessing pages, the most recently accessed page is moved to the top, which helps track the least recently used page for replacement.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
In memory we need to manage, replace the least we can, LRU will have the plan.
Imagine a library where books are borrowed; the books most often checked out stay on the shelf, while dusty tomes that have not been touched are sent back. This is how LRU organizes memory.
Use the acronym 'C-S-L-R' to remember: Count (time), Stack (order), Locality (usage), and Replace (the oldest).
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Page Replacement
Definition:
The process of replacing a page in the memory when it is full.
Term: Least Recently Used (LRU)
Definition:
An algorithm that replaces the least recently accessed page.
Term: Counterbased Solution
Definition:
A method that uses a counter to track the last access time for pages.
Term: Stackbased Solution
Definition:
An implementation of LRU using a stack to manage page access order.
Term: Reference Bit
Definition:
A flag that indicates whether a page was accessed during a specific time period.
Term: Sampled LRU
Definition:
An approximation of LRU that records reference information at set intervals.