7.2.5 - Disadvantages
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Interactive Audio Lesson
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Limitations of Bagging
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Today we're going to talk about the disadvantages of bagging. What do you think could be a potential drawback of using multiple models in bagging?
Maybe it's too time-consuming because you have to train many models?
That's a great observation! Yes, the computational time increases significantly with the number of models. Additionally, bagging does not effectively reduce bias in the base models. Can anyone explain what that means?
So, if the model itself has bias, bagging won't fix that? It just averages out the errors?
Exactly! Bagging can reduce variance but not bias, which means if your base model is fundamentally flawed, bagging won't help. Let's remember this with the phrase: 'Bagging helps in variance, but leaves bias alone.'
Impact of High Computational Cost
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Now, let’s dive deeper into the computational costs associated with bagging. Why do you think it can be an issue in practical applications?
If bagging takes too much time, we might not be able to use it on large datasets or in real-time scenarios?
Exactly! In scenarios where speed is crucial, like in real-time predictions, the time taken by bagging might not be feasible. Can anyone think of an example in real life where speed is essential?
Like in fraud detection systems, where they need to react quickly?
Yes, that's a perfect example! In such cases, a faster model might be preferred over a more accurate bagging model. Remember, speed can be as important as accuracy. Let's summarize: bagging can be computationally expensive and ineffective at reducing bias.
Balancing Bagging's Benefits and Disadvantages
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Now let’s discuss how we can balance the drawbacks we talked about. When might it still make sense to use bagging despite its limitations?
Perhaps when we are dealing with a high-variance model that needs stabilization?
Absolutely correct! Bagging shines for high-variance models. When predicting outcomes where errors from overfitting are problematic, bagging can be beneficial despite the computational cost. Can anyone give another situation where bagging might still be useful?
If we have enough resources or if we can afford the computation time, like in training on powerful servers?
Exactly! If resources are abundant, the benefits of bagging might outweigh the disadvantages. Remember, context is key in machine learning. Let’s wrap up our session by noting: 'Assess the power of bagging against its computational cost and bias limitations when deciding to use it.'
Introduction & Overview
Read summaries of the section's main ideas at different levels of detail.
Quick Overview
Standard
This section discusses the disadvantages of using bagging as an ensemble method, which include its ineffectiveness in reducing bias and the increased computational resources required due to the necessity of training multiple models.
Detailed
Disadvantages of Bagging in Ensemble Methods
Bagging, or Bootstrap Aggregation, is an ensemble technique aimed at improving stability and accuracy, particularly useful for high-variance models like decision trees. However, it has some inherent disadvantages that can limit its effectiveness:
- Not Effective at Reducing Bias: While bagging mainly reduces variance in models, it does not address bias. This means that if the original model (i.e., weak learner) is biased, bagging won't help correct those errors, leading to consistently poor performance on datasets that require less bias.
- Increased Computational Time: The need to train multiple models (one for each bootstrap sample) results in higher computational demands. This can be problematic in cases where resources are limited, or rapid predictions are necessary.
In summary, while bagging is a powerful technique for increasing the robustness of models, understanding and acknowledging its limitations in bias reduction and computational intensity is crucial for effective application.
Youtube Videos
Audio Book
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Ineffectiveness at Reducing Bias
Chapter 1 of 2
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
• Not effective at reducing bias.
Detailed Explanation
This point means that while bagging helps to stabilize predictions by reducing the variability of the model, it does not fundamentally alter the systematic errors that models may have when making predictions. Bias refers to the errors due to overly simplistic assumptions in the learning algorithm. Thus, if a model is fundamentally biased, bagging alone won't fix that flaw, and the model might still yield inaccurate predictions.
Examples & Analogies
Consider a student who struggles with math concepts. If the student practices only basic problems (bagging), they may improve at solving those problems without actually understanding the foundational concepts (bias). If the student doesn’t fundamentally grasp math, practicing won't help overcome this lack of understanding.
Increased Computation Time
Chapter 2 of 2
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
• Large number of models increases computation time.
Detailed Explanation
Bagging requires training multiple models on different subsamples of data. This means that for each model instance, the algorithm goes through the training data. The more models that need training, the longer it takes to compute all these models and aggregate their predictions. Consequently, while bagging improves accuracy and robustness, it also comes with the downside of increased computation costs and time, which can become a limiting factor, especially with large datasets.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine trying to cook a feast. If you decide to prepare multiple dishes (representing multiple models), it will take more time compared to just making one dish. Each additional dish requires preparation, cooking, and serving time. Hence, whilst you end up with a variety of delicious dishes (accurate models), you invested a lot of time to achieve that variety.
Key Concepts
-
Ineffectiveness in Bias Reduction: Bagging cannot correct bias in weak learners.
-
Increased Computational Demand: Training multiple models increases resource requirements.
Examples & Applications
In a dataset containing many noisy features, bagging might improve predictions by focusing on variance but will not help if the base model is inherently flawed.
Using a simple decision tree as the base model, applying bagging can lead to slower response times in applications like online fraud detection due to the need to process multiple models.
Memory Aids
Interactive tools to help you remember key concepts
Rhymes
In bagging we stack models high, but bias won't make them fly.
Stories
Imagine a team of scientists working together, each building a model. They work harder and harder, but if each model is flawed, their combined effort still fails to solve the problem.
Memory Tools
BAG - Bias Averages Granted; Bagging does not fix bias.
Acronyms
BIC - Bagging Increases Computation.
Flash Cards
Glossary
- Bagging
An ensemble method that combines predictions from multiple models trained on different subsets of training data.
- Bias
The error due to overly simplistic assumptions in the learning algorithm that leads to underfitting.
- Variance
The error due to excessive sensitivity to fluctuations in the training set, leading to overfitting.
- Computational Time
The time required for the computer to process the calculations and complete the model training.
Reference links
Supplementary resources to enhance your learning experience.