Practice Time and Space Complexity - 8.2 | 8. Evaluate the Efficiency and Trade-offs of Different Data Structures and Algorithms | Data Structure
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Academics
Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Professional Courses
Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skillsβ€”perfect for learners of all ages.

games

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What does O(1) represent in time complexity?

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about operations that take the same time regardless of input size.

Question 2

Easy

Can you name an algorithm with O(n) complexity?

πŸ’‘ Hint: It's a search method that checks each element one by one.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What does O(log n) significance imply?

  • Linear growth
  • Logarithmic growth
  • Constant growth

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about algorithms that reduce their problem size exponentially.

Question 2

True or False: O(nΒ²) indicates an efficient algorithm for large datasets.

  • True
  • False

πŸ’‘ Hint: Recall examples of algorithms with high complexity.

Solve and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Analyze the time complexity of a recursive algorithm for Fibonacci numbers. How does it change with input size?

πŸ’‘ Hint: Compare it with the iterative method to see the difference.

Question 2

Evaluate an algorithm's performance that consumes more space due to additional data structures. Discuss the trade-offs.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Consider scenarios such as hash tables versus arrays.

Challenge and get performance evaluation