Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skillsβperfect for learners of all ages.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
Today we will learn about the Longest Common Subsequence, or LCS. Can anyone tell me what they think a subsequence is?
Isn't a subsequence like a part of the word, but it doesn't have to be continuous?
Exactly! A subsequence can skip characters as long as the order is maintained. Great job! Now, can someone give me an example?
If I have 'abc' and 'ac', 'ac' is a subsequence of 'abc'.
Perfect! That's a clear example. Remember that LCS is all about finding the longest such subsequence between two sequences.
How is this different from Longest Common Subword?
Great question! A Longest Common Subword requires the letters to be contiguous. LCS, however, allows skipping letters. Keep that in mind as we dive deeper.
In summary, LCS is about finding the longest sequence, where we preserve order, but skipping letters is allowed.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
Now, let's explore the inductive structure of LCS. What happens when we compare two characters from our sequences?
If they match, we can find LCS of the remaining parts of the sequences?
Exactly! If they match, we take the result of the next characters, plus one for the match. What if they don't match?
Then we could ignore either character and find LCS for the remaining parts.
Well done! When characters don't match, we need to consider both possibilities and take the maximum of the two results. Can anyone summarize how we handle the cases?
We either move one character forward in one of the sequences or both if they match!
Exactly. This recursive nature forms the backbone of our dynamic programming approach!
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
Let's talk about how we can solve LCS efficiently using dynamic programming. What do you think that involves?
Caching previous results?
Yes! We build a table that stores the lengths of LCS for subproblems. If we need a solution we've already computed, we just look it up in our table!
And that reduces the time complexity, right?
Correct! Instead of recalculating results, we improve our algorithm's efficiency drastically. Can anyone tell me what the time complexity is?
Itβs O(m * n) where m and n are the lengths of the two sequences!
Thatβs spot on! This way, we can handle long sequences much more efficiently than with brute force methods.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
Now that we understand LCS, let's think about its applications. Can you think of any real-world examples?
Comparing DNA sequences?
Exactly! In genetics, we often need to compare sequences where some segments might be missing or varied.
What about comparing texts, like in programming?
Right again! Tools like 'diff' compare text files line-by-line, finding long matches that indicate similarities between versions.
So, could LCS also help in version control?
Absolutely! LCS can determine how to transform one text into another with minimal changes, which is indispensable in version control systems.
In summary, LCS has vast applications in genetics, data comparison, and even programming!
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section covers the development of the Longest Common Subsequence problem, emphasizing its recursive nature and efficient evaluation using dynamic programming. It explains the inductive structure of solving the problem and contrasts LCS with Longest Common Subword (LCW) to illustrate practical applications.
This section dives into the concept of Longest Common Subsequence (LCS) in the context of programming and algorithms. LCS aims to discover the longest sequence from two given sequences (or words) that maintains the original order, though not necessarily contiguously.
diff
), LCS has wide-ranging applications in computational biology and data manipulation.By the end of this section, readers are expected to grasp how to derive an LCS using both brute force and optimized approaches, improving their algorithmic thinking.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
We are in the realm of Inductive Definitions, Recursive Functions and Efficient Evaluation of these using memorization and dynamic programming. So, we are looking examples of problems where the main target is to identify the inductive structure and once you identify the inductive structure then the recursive structure of the program becomes apparent from which you can extract the dependencies and figure out what kind of memo-table you have and how you will can iteratively using dynamic programming.
This chunk introduces the concept of the Longest Common Subsequence (LCS) and its relevance in computer science, particularly in recursive algorithms and dynamic programming. It highlights the importance of recognizing the inductive structure of a problem, which simplifies the formation of the recursive structure. Understanding these structural dependencies allows one to optimize calculations with memoization, thereby improving efficiency.
Imagine you are piecing together a jigsaw puzzle. Recognizing the pieces' shapes (inductive structure) helps you figure out where they fit (recursive structure). Similarly, in programming, identifying how parts of a problem relate helps in crafting efficient solutions.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
This is the problem in words. So, what you want to do is take a pair of words and find the longest common subword. For instance, here we have secret and secretary and secret is already also inside secretary and clearly secret is the longest word in secret itself. The longest subword that is common is the word secret and it has length 6.
In this chunk, the focus is on the problem statement where we seek to find the longest common subword between two words. For example, between 'secret' and 'secretary', the common subword is 'secret'. This part elaborates on the definition of a subword, which is a contiguous sequence of letters that can be found in both words.
Consider it like looking for a common phrase in two texts. Just like how 'secret' appears in both 'secret' and 'secretary', you might find the phrase 'hello' in both 'hello world' and 'world of hello'.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
There is a brute force algorithm that you could use which is you just start at i and j in two words. In each word, you can start a position i in u j in v and see how far you can go before you find they are not. This unfortunately is effectively now an n cube algorithm.
This chunk explains a basic naive approach to solve the problem, where we start from each character of both words and check for matches. This exhaustive search examines all possible subsequences, leading to an inefficient O(n^3) time complexity. The reason is that for each starting character, we check every subsequent letter for matches, combining both words' lengths.
Imagine searching for matching phrases in two books by checking every page of one book against every page of another. This method would take a long time, especially with larger books, akin to the inefficiency seen in our naive algorithm.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Our goal is to find some inductive structure which makes this thing computationally more efficient. For the inductive structure, we have already kind of seen it when can we say that there is a common subword starting at i j of length k, where we require a_i = b_j.
This chunk introduces the concept of an inductive structure that can simplify the problem. It explains that if characters at specific positions match, we can then focus on the next characters of both words. The previous matches contribute to the solution, reducing the problem's size recursively until we reach the base case.
Think of putting together a recipe where matching ingredients build a dish. If you match some ingredients, like pasta with sauce, you can focus on adding more to the dish without redoing what youβve completed, thus simplifying the cooking process.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
We can fill in those values as 0 because that is given to us by definition and now we can start to solve this iteratively using dynamic programming. We can fill in column by column and if I keep going I find an entry 3. So, the entry 3 is the largest entry that I see and that is the actual answer.
In this segment, the document transitions to a dynamic programming method where we fill a table iteratively based on previously computed values. Instead of starting over for each letter combination, we build from previously computed solutions (lengths of common subwords). This approach leads to significant time savings and results in finding the answer in polynomial time.
Imagine solving a large maze by laying down a map with known paths. Instead of retracing your steps over and over, you mark down the best paths youβve found, allowing future routes to build on previous knowledge, allowing you to find the exit more quickly.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
A much more useful problem in practice than the longest common subword is what is called the longest common subsequence. The difference between a subword and a subsequence is that we are allowed to drop some letters in between. For example, if we have bisect and secret earlier, we can match sec with sec but now we can take this extra t.
The document concludes by distinguishing between the longest common subsequence (LCS) and the longest common subword. The LCS allows for characters to be skipped, making it more applicable in real scenarios like comparing genetic sequences or version control in files. This flexibility provides a powerful framework for analyzing similarities between sequences beyond mere contiguous matches.
Consider finding a common theme in overlapping stories. If you read two novels that share characters, even if some chapters are skipped or told out of order, recognizing the characters still allows you to appreciate the overarching narrative. Just like finding sequences in two words that may not match perfectly but still tell a similar story.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Inductive Definitions: Understanding the prominent inductive structure of the LCS problem is essential for constructing the recursive solution.
Dynamic Programming: This technique enhances the computational efficiency of finding LCS by caching results of subproblems, thus avoiding redundant calculations.
Practical Applications: From genetic sequence alignment to file comparison (e.g., using the UNIX command diff
), LCS has wide-ranging applications in computational biology and data manipulation.
The relationship between LCS and LCW: While LCW focuses on contiguous subwords, LCS allows for gaps, making it more applicable for real-world problems.
The need to establish the base cases and how these influence the overall recursive formula used in dynamic programming.
By the end of this section, readers are expected to grasp how to derive an LCS using both brute force and optimized approaches, improving their algorithmic thinking.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
Comparing 'ABC' and 'AC': The LCS is 'AC'.
In genetic sequences, finding the LCS helps match sequences with variations.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
LCS is what we seek, letters in order, that makes it unique.
Imagine two friends searching for the longest string of shared memories, where they can skip events but preserve the order of joy.
Remember the acronym 'LCS' - 'Longest Collection of Sequences!'
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Longest Common Subsequence (LCS)
Definition:
The longest subsequence that can appear in both input sequences without rearranging.
Term: Inductive Structure
Definition:
A problem-solving approach that breaks down a problem into smaller subproblems based on defined rules.
Term: Dynamic Programming
Definition:
An optimization technique that solves complex problems by breaking them down into simpler subproblems and storing their solutions.
Term: Subsequence
Definition:
A sequence derived from another sequence where some elements may be omitted but the order is preserved.
Term: Brute Force
Definition:
A straightforward way of solving problems that involves checking all possible solutions.
Term: Caching
Definition:
Storing the results of expensive function calls and reusing them when the same inputs occur again.