Practice Ease of Maintenance and Post-Production Testing - 1.4.4 | 1. Introduction to Design for Testability | Design for Testability
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What is the primary purpose of Design for Testability?

💡 Hint: Think about why products need to be tested.

Question 2

Easy

Define Built-In Self-Test.

💡 Hint: Consider how a device can check itself without outside help.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What does DFT stand for in electronics?

  • Design for Testability
  • Design for Technology
  • Drive for Testability

💡 Hint: Recall what DFT emphasizes in electronic systems.

Question 2

True or False: Built-In Self-Test enables a system to run diagnostics without external equipment.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Think about what BIST allows a device to do.

Solve 1 more question and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Consider an electronic device that frequently fails after deployment, causing high maintenance costs. Propose improvements to its design using DFT principles.

💡 Hint: Think about how DFT aids in identifying issues proactively.

Question 2

Analyze how the absence of DFT could lead to an increase in product recalls for an electronics company. What could be the long-term impacts?

💡 Hint: Reflect on the complexities of device diagnostics in the absence of DFT.

Challenge and get performance evaluation