Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Let's start with the landmark case of Rajive Raturi vs Union of India in 2016. Can someone explain what the Supreme Court mandated regarding government buildings?
They mandated that all government buildings need to be made accessible. But I am not clear about the timeline aspect.
Great question! The Court instructed ministries to adopt harmonized guidelines and set a timeline for compliance. Memory aid: think of 'Raturi' as 'Rally for Accessibility' to remember the push for time-bound actions!
And what happens if they don’t comply?
If they fail to comply, it highlights significant legal and public accountability issues. Remember, 'Time is Key' for accessibility deadlines!
Can we see any effects of this ruling happening today?
Absolutely. The ongoing accessibility reviews and audits in public spaces can be traced back to this decision. Let’s summarize: The Raturi case set the precedent for mandatory timelines in making public infrastructure accessible.
Now let's discuss Vikash Kumar vs UPSC from 2021. What did the Supreme Court determine about examination accommodations for PwDs?
They established that PwDs have the right to reasonable accommodations like scribes for exams!
Exactly! This ruling conveys that access to education is a fundamental right. A memory tip: 'Vikash' sounds like 'Vikas' meaning progress, showing how the judicial system progresses accessibility!
Why is this judgment significant?
It is crucial because it promotes equity in education, allowing PwDs to compete fairly with others. Remember, 'Equality in Exams' ensures all have a fair chance!
Will this lead to more policies for educational institutions?
Yes, educational policies are bound to evolve following this case, enhancing overall inclusion. In summary, Vikash Kumar’s case reinforces the right to equitable education through reasonable accommodations.
Next, we’ll talk about the Disabled Rights Group vs Ministry of Civil Aviation. What was the central requirement that arose from this case?
Airports had to incorporate accessible design standards like ramps and accessible washrooms.
Correct! This ruling was a critical step towards making airports disability-friendly. A rhyme to remember: 'At airports wide, ramps abide, making travel easier with pride!'
Has this led to improvements in other public transport facilities?
Definitely. This judgment impacted further regulations across transportation sectors. In essence, it emphasizes how inclusive design is essential for mobility.
Can we see more cases leading to improvements in these areas?
Yes, the precedent established encourages constant review and improvement. Summary takeaway: The case reinforced the necessity for airports to implement accessible design for inclusive travel.
Lastly, let’s explore Jeeja Ghosh vs SpiceJet Ltd. What key principle did this judgment support regarding service delivery?
It reinforced the dignity of PwDs and that they should not be discriminated against in private services.
Right! This case established a significant legal precedent against discrimination in private sectors. A mnemonic to remember: 'Ghosh stands for 'Gauranteed access equals fairness!'
What led to the case?
The unjust removal of a disabled passenger clearly underscored the need for private entities to adhere to accessibility standards. Summary point: The ruling ensures that rights of PwDs are upheld across all service sectors.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section outlines four important judicial cases that have set precedents for accessibility in India, including mandates for government buildings, examination accommodations for PwDs, design standards in airports, and the protection of rights in private services against discrimination.
This section highlights pivotal judicial decisions in India that have enhanced the accessibility rights of persons with disabilities (PwDs). The following cases illustrate the evolution of legal recognition in this area:
These judgments collectively serve as crucial milestones that propel the movement towards an inclusive society, where accessibility is not merely a concept but a legal right.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Supreme Court mandated that all government buildings must be made accessible in a time-bound manner.
Highlighted failure of compliance and instructed ministries to adopt Harmonised Guidelines.
In the case of Rajive Raturi vs Union of India, the Supreme Court recognized the critical need for accessibility in public infrastructure. The court ordered that all government buildings be made accessible within a specified timeframe, emphasizing accountability among government ministries. This case is significant as it not only focused on the legal aspects but also highlighted the failures of compliance with existing accessibility standards. The instructions for ministries to adopt Harmonised Guidelines pointed to the need for a structured approach to accessibility, enforcing a practical timeline for implementation.
Imagine if a new highway were built, but there were no entry ramps for people in wheelchairs at the rest stops. Rajive Raturi’s case is like a court saying, 'We need to fix this!' and telling the builders to ensure every stop has ramps ready before the highway opens. It’s about making sure everyone can use these public spaces comfortably and safely.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Supreme Court recognized the right of PwDs to reasonable accommodation, including use of a scribe during competitive exams.
In Vikash Kumar vs UPSC, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of providing reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities (PwDs) during competitive examinations. This included allowing candidates to use a scribe, ensuring that PwDs have equal opportunities to participate in these exams. The ruling underscored the principle that accessibility is not just physical—it also encompasses necessary support to level the playing field in competitive environments.
Think about taking a big exam where everyone has a computer to write their answers, but you can’t use one because of your disability. The Supreme Court said it’s like providing a buddy to help you type your answers if that’s what you need, just like sharing notes with a friend to make sure everyone can do well in school.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Enforced accessible design standards in airports including boarding ramps, accessible washrooms, and counters.
The case of Disabled Rights Group vs Ministry of Civil Aviation was pivotal in establishing accessible design standards for airports. The Supreme Court mandated that airports should be designed to include facilities such as boarding ramps, accessible washrooms, and counters that cater specifically to the needs of PwDs. This judgment was significant in transforming how public transport infrastructure should be equipped to be inclusive, thereby promoting the rights of individuals with disabilities.
Imagine going to an airport where all the counters are too high for a person in a wheelchair. This case is like the court saying, 'Let’s make sure every counter is easy to reach and has ramps for everyone.' It’s about creating an airport where all travelers feel welcomed and accommodated.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Airlines penalized for forcibly deboarding a disabled passenger.
Reaffirmed the dignity and rights of PwDs in private services.
In the Jeeja Ghosh vs SpiceJet case, the Supreme Court held the airline accountable for forcibly deboarding a disabled passenger, reinforcing the rights of PwDs to travel without discrimination. This judgment was a landmark effort to uphold the dignity of persons with disabilities, ensuring that private service providers, like airlines, also adhere to accessibility norms and treat PwDs with respect and dignity.
Picture planning a family vacation and having your ticket booked, only to be told you're not allowed on the plane because of your disability. In this case, the court ensured that no one can kick a person off just because they have a disability—it's about treating everyone fairly, just like how we should treat our friends, no matter their abilities.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Landmark Judgments: Court decisions that significantly shape accessibility rights for PwDs.
Accessibility Rights: Legal rights ensuring PwDs can access public and private spaces.
Compliance Mandates: Legal requirements for buildings to adhere to accessibility standards.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
The Rajive Raturi vs Union of India case led to the enforcement of accessible infrastructure in government buildings.
The Vikash Kumar vs UPSC ruling highlighted the necessity of reasonable accommodations in competitive exams.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
To the airports we go, with ramps in tow, accessibility is the way to show, inclusivity must grow!
Once there was a young woman with a disability who could not board a plane because of a lack of ramps. After the Jeeja Ghosh case, airport authorities ensured that all travelers could easily access flight services, allowing everyone to take to the skies.
RAVI - Rajive, Accessibility, Vikash, Inclusion. Remember this to recall key judgments related to accessibility rights.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Accessibility
Definition:
The design of products, devices, services, or environments for people with disabilities.
Term: PwDs
Definition:
Persons with Disabilities, representing individuals who have physical, mental, or sensory impairments.
Term: Judiciary
Definition:
The judicial authorities of a country responsible for maintaining the law.
Term: Compliance
Definition:
Adhering to laws, regulations, and guidelines.
Term: Harmonized Guidelines
Definition:
Agreed standards and practices aimed at ensuring uniform accessibility.