Practice Legal and Regulatory Framework - 4 | 4. Legal and Regulatory Framework | Disability, Accessibility and Universal Design
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

4 - Legal and Regulatory Framework

Enroll to start learning

You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.

Learning

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What does Article 14 of the Indian Constitution ensure?

💡 Hint: Think about legal protection.

Question 2

Easy

What is one of the key focuses of the RPwD Act?

💡 Hint: Consider the act's purpose.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What does Article 15 of the Indian Constitution prohibit?

  • Discrimination based on disability
  • Freedom of speech
  • Right to education

💡 Hint: Focus on equality aspects.

Question 2

True or False: The RPwD Act of 2016 recognized only seven disabilities.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Recall the changes made by the act.

Solve and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Create a plan for modifying an older public building to meet current accessibility standards as outlined in the RPwD Act.

💡 Hint: Consider factors like budget and design.

Question 2

Evaluate the effectiveness of current accessibility laws in India and propose enhancements.

💡 Hint: Focus on real-world applications of policies.

Challenge and get performance evaluation