1.2. Limitation of Knowledge Regarding Risks

So, no person can know everything, right? I do not know what everything in my life, there are so many things happening, I do not know about a chemical risk maybe I know little about disaster risk around me, most people cannot be aware of the most of the dangers most of the time.

This chunk emphasizes that no individual possesses complete knowledge of all potential risks in life. It starts with a rhetorical question, asserting the impossibility of knowing everything. The speaker reflects on personal limitations in understanding various risks, like chemical and disaster risks, illustrating that ignorance is a common human experience. Most people, just like the speaker, are often unaware of many dangers that surround them in daily life.

Consider a student preparing for a big exam. They may study diligently for various subjects but may still feel underprepared because they can't predict every question or concept that will be tested. Similarly, in life, regardless of how much we learn about risks, there will always be aspects we may not fully understand.

So, I have so many risks in life. I have health risk, I have job risk, I have financial risk, I have academic risk, flood risk, personal risk. I am not only facing disaster risk; every day is a live risk from my home to office.

In this segment, the speaker lists various types of risks they encounter in everyday life. These include health risks (concerns about personal well-being), job risks (uncertainty in employment), financial risks (money-related uncertainties), academic risks (potential failures in education), as well as risks of natural disasters and personal situations that may occur. By highlighting these multiple risks, the speaker illustrates how life is filled with uncertainties at every turn.

Think about a typical day for someone commuting to work. They might face health risks from pollution, stress from workload (job risk), potential accidents during travel (personal risk), and financial decisions regarding their expenses. Each choice carries its own risks, much like navigating a complex maze where every turn presents new challenges.

So, which one should I prioritize? Which one because I cannot being an individual, I do not know that what will actually happen. Because my knowledge is very limited and that should be.

The speaker raises a critical question about how to prioritize among the various risks they face. Due to limited knowledge and unpredictability about future events, it becomes challenging to determine which risks should receive immediate attention. This reflects a common dilemma in risk management: individuals must often make decisions without having complete information, leading to uncertainty in their choices.

Imagine a firefighter responding to multiple emergencies – a building on fire, a car accident, and a medical emergency. They must quickly assess which situation poses the greatest danger and allocate resources accordingly, often relying on their experience and training to make split-second decisions without knowing the full scope of each incident.

Now, the question is, how then do people decide which risk to take and which risk to ignore?

This part introduces the fundamental question regarding decision-making processes regarding risk. It prompts the audience to think critically about the methods individuals use to evaluate risks and their choices. Recognizing that everyone faces numerous risks, the focus is on understanding how to navigate those choices effectively.

Think of a dietitian who must choose which health risks to address first in their clients, such as obesity, diabetes, or high cholesterol. They assess each risk's severity and the client’s lifestyle to recommend changes, illustrating a strategic decision-making process in risk selection.

Now, coming also the question; are dangers really increasing, are we really at risk than before? Or, are we more afraid, which one is true? The dangers are increasing, or we are at more risk.

This chunk presents a question of perception versus reality in risk assessment. It suggests that there might be a debate around whether actual dangers in life have increased over time or if our awareness of these threats has simply heightened, leading to increased fear. This invites reflection on how perceptions influence our understanding of risks.

Consider how people reacted to the emergence of the internet and social media – while connectivity and information have enhanced communication, they have also introduced fears about privacy and security that many feel are greater now than in past generations, despite the actual data suggesting lower crime rates in certain areas.

Let us look; accident rate, life expectancy, infant mortality. What do you think dangers is increasing? No, we are much safer, accident rate basically decreasing, life expectancy basically increasing and infant mortality rate basically decreasing.

Here, the speaker examines statistical trends related to safety. They assert that key indicators like accident rates, life expectancy, and infant mortality are improving. This serves to counter the earlier claims of increasing dangers, providing evidence that, on a broader statistical level, humanity has made significant strides in improving safety and health outcomes.

To illustrate this point, look at road safety improvements over the decades – the introduction of seatbelts, airbags, and stricter traffic regulations has contributed to fewer accidents and fatalities on the roads, showcasing progress in public safety despite a heightened awareness of road risks.

But, on the other hand, we are more exposed to toxic chemicals and we are far away from nature than before, right, we are more and more exposed to radiation than before so, these risks are increasing. Also, our stressful life is increasing, environmental pollution definitely is increasing, sound pollution is increasing.

In contrast to the previously mentioned positive trends, this chunk highlights emerging risks that have become prevalent in modern society. The speaker notes increased exposure to toxins and pollutants and emerging environmental stressors, which reflect a different side of risk management: while some indicators improve, others grow more concerning.

Think about chemical exposure in everyday products. Items like cleaning agents, cosmetics, and even food contain chemicals that can be harmful in large amounts, making awareness of their effects increasingly important, much like a gardener who must balance the beauty of their flower beds with the reality of harmful weeds.

--