Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Let's begin by discussing how different groups perceive risks. Research indicates that the general public feels more apprehensive about societal risks now than they did 20 years ago. Why do you think that is?
Maybe they are more aware of global issues now.
Exactly! Increased access to information can lead to heightened awareness. Did you know that twice as many people from the general public think there are more risks now compared to corporate executives?
That's interesting! Why do executives see less risk?
Executives may focus more on specific metrics and data, while the public might be more influenced by news and social media. This difference shows how context shapes our perceptions.
It makes sense that different backgrounds affect how we see risks.
Absolutely! This means engaging effectively with the public requires understanding their values and concerns. Let's summarize: public perception of risk is increasing, but executive perception is different.
Now let’s look at decision making in emergencies, like when a flood is imminent. What do you think influences someone's decision to evacuate or stay?
They might not think evacuation is effective?
Precisely! If someone doubts the effectiveness of evacuation, they might hesitate. This uncertainty leads to cognitive conflict. Can anyone offer an example?
Like someone thinking, 'I could stay safe at home or take a risk by evacuating.'
Exactly! It’s all about weighing the perceived benefits against the risks. However, social influences can change decisions.
So if friends say evacuating is important, a person might decide to go?
Right! Hearing information from trusted peers can sway decisions. To summarize, personal beliefs and social influence majorly impact emergency decisions.
Let's conclude by discussing knowledge and consent in decision making. Why are both important?
If people don’t have enough knowledge, they might not agree on what to do.
Correct! When knowledge is uncertain and consent contested, decision making can become very complicated. How does this affect disaster preparedness?
It probably means people won’t take necessary actions if they don’t understand the risks.
Exactly! Effective messaging is crucial to encourage action during disasters. To wrap up, knowledge and clear communication are vital in disaster preparedness.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section highlights research findings on the increasing risks perceived by the general public compared to executives and regulators, exploring the factors influencing decision making in crisis situations, such as knowledge and consent, which complicate actions like evacuation during disasters.
This section examines the challenges individuals face in decision making during risky situations. It offers insights from interviews conducted with three groups: the general public, corporate executives, and federal regulators. A significant finding is that the general public perceives higher risks today compared to twenty years ago, with twice as many believing in increased societal risks than corporate executives. The section also reveals a discrepancy in views on domestic political instability, and specifically, dangers posed by chemicals and economic risks.
The discussion continues by highlighting that individual cognition plays a vital role in how people react to perceived risks, such as the threat of floods. Many individuals hesitate to evacuate due to uncertainty about the effectiveness of such actions, leading to a cognitive dissonance between perceived risks and the lack of clarity regarding appropriate responses. The importance of social influence is also emphasized, where individuals might change their stance based on the opinions of peers.
The section concludes by stressing that both knowledge and consent impact decision-making. When knowledge is contested and consent is uncertain, it complicates preparedness actions, especially during emergencies. The need for effective messaging to encourage preventive actions is highlighted as crucial for enhancing disaster preparedness.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Three kinds of people were interviewed; general public, corporate executives, and federal regulators. What result we have found, is risk increasing than before? Twice as many people in the general public compared to company executives think more risk in society than 20 years ago. What about domestic political instability; 61% both public and executive, they believe that we have more risk today than before. Whereas the bureaucrats or the government officials, public officials, 44% of them agreed with this statement, they do not believe domestic political instability is increasing.
This chunk discusses how different groups perceive risk differently. A survey reveals that the general public feels there is more risk in society compared to corporate executives, with the public being significantly more anxious about potential risks. Additionally, while a majority of the public and executives believe domestic political instability is on the rise, a smaller percentage of government officials share this view. This discrepancy highlights varying perceptions of risk across societal sectors.
Think of it like a sports team where players often have different opinions about an opponent's strength. The average fan might see a team as a serious threat because they focus on headlines and statistics, while a professional coach may have a more nuanced understanding based on in-depth analysis and past experiences. Similarly, the general public and corporate executives view the risks in society through different lenses.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Dangers from chemicals? Increasing than 20 years before? Company executives - they believe 38% say yes and public and government regulators; 13 % said yes increasing. Economic risk than before - 10% government employees public officials, they said yes, 41 % of company executives said yes.
In this chunk, the perceptions regarding risks from chemicals and economic stability are explored. Company executives seem more concerned about the rising dangers from chemicals than the public and regulators. Similarly, a substantial division exists regarding economic risks; a significant majority of company executives recognize increasing economic risks, while a lower percentage of government officials shares that belief. This indicates a gap in understanding and concern about specific risks.
Imagine two groups discussing the safety of a new product. Engineers might be highly aware of the potential dangers based on technical data, while most consumers may only become aware of these dangers when they see news reports or receive warnings. The engineers (similar to executives) are already considering the risks, while the general public may not yet recognize them.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, people have different perspectives in understanding risk, how we have to encourage them for preparedness then, not only that risk but also about countermeasures. This person if we ask someone that okay, flood is coming, please evacuate. He is in under great dilemma whether to evacuate or not, maybe risk is coming, maybe flood is coming but I simply cannot make that decision why? Because, I really do not know the effect of evacuation, is it really effective?
This part addresses the difficulties individuals face when making decisions during risky situations, like an impending flood. Even when aware of the risk, a person may hesitate to evacuate due to uncertainty about whether evacuation is the right choice. This uncertainty complicates their ability to act effectively, revealing the need for clear information about risks and responses.
Imagine being at a concert when someone yells 'fire!' In that moment, you might feel confused and uncertain about what to do. Should you stay in place or rush out? While you realize there is danger (the risk), the lack of specific guidance on what action to take (like whether staying put or evacuating is safer) can paralyze your decision-making.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, we have this context one is the knowledge, one is the consent; in knowledge, we have risk sometimes certain, sometimes uncertain. In case of consent, that is what actions to be taken is sometimes we agreed with each other, sometimes we do not agree with each other so, contested and complete, when knowledge is uncertain, but consent is complete, decision making is difficult.
This chunk emphasizes the relationship between knowledge (understanding the risk) and consent (agreement on actions). When knowledge about a risk is unclear but everyone agrees on a course of action, decision-making becomes challenging. Additionally, knowing something is a risk does not necessarily mean people agree on how to respond, making decisions even more complex.
Consider a group of friends deciding whether to go hiking when rain is forecasted. Some believe that light rain won't be a problem, while others are worried about safety. Even though they may know there’s a risk (the rain), the lack of consensus on whether to hike can lead to confusion and conflict over what to do next.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Some knowledge are uncertain, and also consented. So what is risky, what extent something is risky, why risky is important for people to know. And also we need to know the preparedness; what is the priority work, which one I should do first, what is effective, who will do it, and when would be done so, these components should be included when we are talking about a disaster preparedness.
This section outlines the complexity of understanding risk and determining appropriate preparedness actions. It argues that it is essential for individuals to prioritize their tasks, understand effective actions, know who is responsible, and when those actions must be executed. This complexity makes it vital for communities to have clear communication and guidance during emergencies.
Imagine planning a trip during hurricane season. You need to recognize the risk (the hurricane) but also figure out what to do next: should you pack up and leave early? Do you secure your home first? Knowing what to prioritize can be confusing, especially when information may change as the event approaches.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Perception of Risk: The awareness and interpretation of potential dangers influencing individual behavior.
Cognitive Bias: Mental shortcuts that affect decision-making under uncertainty.
Social Influence: The effect that the presence or opinions of others have on an individual's choices.
Decision Making: The process of making choices, particularly under conditions of risk and uncertainty.
Preparedness Action: Steps taken in advance to prepare for potential emergencies or disasters.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
A community faces warnings of flooding, and residents must decide whether to evacuate based on social influence and personal beliefs about the risks involved.
A workplace is put on notice about toxic chemicals being released. Employees must weigh the risks of staying at work versus evacuating without clear guidance.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
In the wake of a storm, friend voices will swarm, trust them for safety, to keep you warm.
Imagine a town struck by floods. Maria doubts evacuating until her friends reassure her of their safety in numbers. This moment of social trust leads them all to evacuate successfully.
Remember 'PEERS' for decision-making: P - Public perception, E - Emotions, E - Effectiveness, R - Risks, S - Social influence.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Risk
Definition:
The possibility of loss or injury occurring.
Term: Cognitive Dissonance
Definition:
The mental discomfort experienced when holding contradictory beliefs.
Term: Social Influence
Definition:
The effects of other people’s beliefs and behaviors on an individual's actions.
Term: Evacuation
Definition:
The action of leaving a dangerous place or situation.
Term: Preparedness
Definition:
The state of being ready for a disaster or emergency.