Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today, we're talking about the perception of risk regarding domestic political instability. A survey showed that 61% of both the general public and corporate executives believe these risks are increasing compared to 20 years ago. However, only 44% of government officials agree. Why do you think there’s such a difference in perception?
Maybe the government officials have more information and are less concerned because they can manage the risks better?
Or it could be that they're less in tune with public sentiment since they work in a different context.
Exactly! Understanding the context in which these groups operate is crucial. Remember, knowledge can sometimes lead to different conclusions. Let’s move to how these perceptions affect decision-making.
When faced with a crisis, such as a flood, individuals often hesitate to take action. For example, if they are advised to evacuate, they might question the effectiveness of that action. What do you think influence their decision?
It sounds like it could be their prior experiences and beliefs about evacuation not being effective could affect them.
Friends and family might also play a role! If everyone around them believes evacuation is necessary, that peer pressure can change their minds.
Excellent point! Social influences are a powerful factor, highlighting the interplay between knowledge and consent. Let’s summarize our key points before moving on.
Finally, let's discuss the importance of preparedness. We need to inform people not only about the risks but also about effective actions. What components should be included in a message about disaster preparedness?
Like steps to follow when a flood is coming and who should do what.
And the timeline! When should they take action?
Exactly! We need clarity on priorities and actions. Preparing them effectively can enhance their response during emergencies. Let’s wrap up by hearing everyone’s takeaway.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section highlights a survey indicating that a significant portion of the public perceives an increase in domestic political instability and related risks over the past two decades, contrasting with less concern among government officials. It further explores the cognitive challenges individuals face in making decisions during crises and emphasizes the importance of knowledge, consent, and preparedness in disaster scenarios.
In this section, we explore the perceptions of risk regarding domestic political instability among different groups: the general public, corporate executives, and federal regulators. A survey indicates that 61% of the public and executives believe that societal risks have increased compared to 20 years ago, whereas only 44% of government officials share this sentiment. Additionally, we delve into the cognitive mechanisms that influence decision-making during crisis situations, such as evacuation during natural disasters. The distinction between knowledge and consent, particularly when both are contested, creates further complexities in risk perception and action. This highlights the need for effective communication concerning risk and preparedness in disaster response, encouraging individuals to engage in preventive actions.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
What result we have found, is risk increasing than before? Twice as many people in the general public compared to so, general public twice compared to company executive, think more risk in society than 20 years ago.
This chunk discusses how perceptions of risk have changed over time. It suggests that a larger portion of the general public believes that risks in society, including political instability, have increased compared to 20 years ago. Specifically, it indicates that the general public feels this risk more than company executives do, highlighting a disparity in perspectives on societal risks.
Imagine a community where residents feel an increase in crime, while the local business owners don't feel as affected. The residents might have seen or experienced more troubling incidents, leading them to believe their neighborhood is less safe, whereas business owners may focus more on economic success and not notice the same issues, creating a gap in their understanding of safety.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
What about domestic political instability; 61% both public and executive, they believe that we have more risk today than before. Whereas the bureaucrats or the government officials, public officials, 44% of them agreed with this statement, they do not believe domestic political instability is increasing.
This section highlights a division in opinions about domestic political instability. While 61% of both the general public and company executives believe that political risks have increased, only 44% of government officials share this belief. This divergence emphasizes the challenges in acknowledging and responding to perceived political threats, suggesting that those within the government may not feel as threatened compared to civilians.
Think of a sports team where players and fans feel the pressure of an upcoming match intensely. The fans fear they'll lose if the opposing team is stronger, while the coaches and players, with their different perspectives, might focus more on strategy and less on fear—illustrating how varying roles can lead to different perceptions of risk.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, people have different perspective in about understanding risk, how we have to encourage them for the preparedness then, not only that risk but also about countermeasures, this person if we ask someone that okay, flood is coming, please evacuate.
This chunk emphasizes the differences in how people perceive and react to risks. It illustrates the scenario of a person faced with an impending flood who may hesitate to evacuate due to uncertainty about the evacuation's effectiveness and its impact on safety. The individual’s cognitive process shapes their perception of risk, revealing a complex relationship between knowledge and decision-making.
Imagine a student faced with a pop quiz. They may know they should study to avoid failing (the perceived risk) but hesitate to take action because they’re unsure how effective their study methods are (the countermeasure). Until they find a study technique that works for them, they may procrastinate, mirroring how individuals respond hesitantly to risks they don't clearly understand.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
But, it is also possible that, he first said that I do not want to evacuate because this is not effective, evacuation is not a right measure to protect myself from flood. Now, if he does not believe it, we cannot improve; encourage him to take preparedness action.
The chunk explains that social influences can significantly affect individual decision-making regarding risk. An individual who initially decides against evacuation due to doubt about its effectiveness might change their mind if influenced by friends or social circles who advocate for evacuation. This highlights the important role of social proof in shaping perceptions of risk and preparedness actions.
Consider how teenagers often feel pressure to join social trends. If most of their friends decide to use a certain app or wear a particular style of clothing, even those who initially refuse may change their minds to fit in. Similarly, social dynamics can lead someone to reconsider their stance on evacuation, recognizing it as a valid protective measure against perceived risks.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, we have this context one is the knowledge, one is the consent; in knowledge, we have risk sometimes certain, sometimes uncertain.
This section introduces the concepts of knowledge and consent relating to risk assessment. Knowledge about risks can be either certain or uncertain, while consent about actions to take may vary in agreement. The clarity or ambiguity of knowledge can influence decision-making about preparedness actions in the face of risks, making it crucial to understand both components when preparing for potential disasters.
Consider the difference between knowing there might be a storm (uncertain knowledge) versus a weather warning for a hurricane (certain knowledge). If communities are informed well about the risk (knowledge), they can rally together (consent) to take appropriate actions, such as organizing evacuations and safety measures, demonstrating that clarity in communication enhances preparedness effectiveness.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
And how to work on, how to send a message, encourage people to take preventive actions against disasters and that we will look into so.
This final chunk focuses on the necessity of effectively communicating risk and the importance of preparedness to the public. Understanding how to convey accurate messages about risks and the necessary countermeasures is essential for encouraging proactive behaviors in individuals and communities to mitigate the impacts of disasters.
Think of a fire drill at school. The students are told what to do in the event of a fire: stay calm and follow their teachers outside. This communication helps prepare them for any real emergencies, emphasizing that clear instructions can lead to better preparedness and protection in case of actual hazards.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Risk Increasing: The perception that there are more risks in society today than there were two decades ago.
Dissonance in Perception: Different groups perceive risks differently based on their background and knowledge.
Cognitive Mechanism: The process by which individuals process information and make decisions under uncertainty.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
A recent survey shows that 65% of the general public feels that societal risks have increased compared to 20 years ago, prompting an urgent need for effective disaster preparedness communication.
During a flood event, individuals may initially resist evacuation due to questioning its efficacy. This cognitive barrier can lead to delays in life-saving decisions.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
In a crisis there’s doubt, in floods we may pout, decisions can waver, but knowledge is the favor.
Imagine a group of friends faced with a flood warning. Some are scared to evacuate, thinking it won’t help. But as they discuss, they find reassurance in each other and decide to act together, highlighting the power of social influence in decision-making.
RISK: Remember Information and Social Knowledge. Understanding how knowledge and social circles shape risk perceptions.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Domestic Political Instability
Definition:
The state of political disorder or uncertainty within a nation, often leading to risks such as violence, unrest, or economic disruption.
Term: Cognitive Dissonance
Definition:
The mental discomfort experienced when holding two or more contradictory beliefs or ideas.
Term: Preparedness
Definition:
The state of being ready for a possible disaster or emergency, involving planning and taking proactive measures.
Term: Risk Perception
Definition:
The subjective judgment that individuals make regarding the characteristics and severity of a risk.