4.4. Challenges in Economic Regeneration

Post-disaster spatial practice assemblages; there is a strong need that architecture as a theory has to contemplate on the transformation nature of the shelter practices, the built environment especially in the post-disaster recovery because it talks about both as a short term the medium and long term adaptive practices. Ideally our dependency on the built environment itself enhances vulnerability because we depend more on the built environment, we depend more on the shelters, earlier when man was a nomad when man was hiding in caves. That time the vulnerability component has a different meaning, but today our dependency of life I mean our life dependence is more to do with the built environment.

In this chunk, we discuss the changing role of architecture in post-disaster contexts. We rely heavily on our built environment for survival—unlike our ancestors who were nomadic and lived in caves, modern society is more fixed in location and infrastructure. This reliance can increase vulnerability to disasters, as people are more connected to the structures they inhabit.

Think of a house as a ship. In ancient times, people navigated constantly, adjusting to their environment, like sailors in the sea. Today, people anchor themselves in homes, depending greatly on them for safety. Just like a ship can sink, a house can fail us during disasters, leading to greater vulnerability.

For instance, in Cappadocia an example in the Central Anatolia. Where lot of peasants live and you can see these tufa rock pinnacles which are actually formed from the ancient deposits of the lava dust, and because of the exposure to the air and these soft rock hardens so that the interiors have firm walls. So people started dwelling to their all small dwellings and people started living in those houses and as you know the fault line passes through turkey and it has been one of the earthquake-prone area. And these pinnacles often collapse destroying the dwellings and you can see many of those have the Cavusin which is a Greek village which has actually been demolished.

Cappadocia is described as a unique living environment where people have built homes in tufa rock formations. However, due to the geological instability of the region—being earthquake-prone—these homes are at risk of collapsing. This highlights the immediate challenge of living in such an environment that is both beautiful and hazardous.

Imagine living in a beautiful treehouse. While it might seem magical, if a storm comes, it might not be safe. The residents of Cappadocia are like those living in treehouses; the beauty and location create a special life, but the risk of disaster looms large.

Despite of these people given an opportunity to go back and settled somewhere else, they came back and they settled because of various other reasons because tourism is one of the important component, people come so that is where their livelihood is based on.

Many residents choose to return to their homes despite the risks involved. This decision often stems from a connection to their community and culture, as well as economic reasons—tourism plays a significant role in their livelihoods, leading them to prioritize staying in their traditional locations.

Consider a small café that has been in your family for generations. Even if it faces difficulties or unsafe conditions, the ties to your family’s history and the income it generates can compel you to stay rather than move elsewhere, showcasing both cultural and economic attachments.

This is in Gibellina in Sicily when 1968 a violent earthquake have destroyed almost 1 lakh people became homeless. And this is where the Mayor Corra have talked about looking at cultural renaissance through the urban reconstruction of Gibellina earlier it was only a 5000 habitants, but now they projected it for 50,000 people. So if you look at a huge squares the monumental aspect of architecture and today what you are seeing in these pictures is no one is present, so the vastness of the project is so huge.

The town of Gibellina in Sicily was devastated by an earthquake in 1968, leaving a huge number of residents homeless. The mayor proposed a grand plan for cultural and urban renewal that aimed not just to restore but to expand the town significantly to accommodate a much larger population. However, the scale of the project has led to underutilization, with vast open spaces and few residents, questioning the effectiveness of such a grandiose vision.

Think of trying to build a big amusement park in a small town where not many people live. If the park is too large compared to the population, it may feel empty with few visitors. Gibellina’s experience is similar, where ambitious plans led to spaces that are grand but not practically utilized.

But because we have the front garden which is detaching the house from the street. And it actually separates the neighbours, so there is the social interactions for weekend and the scale of parking because the kind of vastness they are projected it also has to implicate with the maintenance of the project.

The design of new urban spaces, such as front gardens separating houses from the street, can artificially create distance between neighbors, reducing social interaction. This design change shifts communal interactions to the periphery, something that was more common in the previous smaller, closely-knit housing schemes. The scale also raises concerns about the maintenance of these large public areas.

Imagine living in an apartment complex where everyone has their own fenced gardens. While it may provide privacy, it makes it harder to interact with neighbors, which can diminish community bonds, much like the changes seen in Gibellina.

Now what you can see is not many people out there and their economic regeneration, the maintenance aspects there are many other issues came later on. This is a monument which the Alberto Burri have developed The Cretto in 12 hectares what they did was he made the whole skeleton of the village the settlement as it is and he made as concrete mounds where it talks about a one-meter height. And so that it becomes a memory a collective memory. So he is trying to give a spatial dimension to the collective memory of the old city turning a place of devastation and pain into a work of art.

Alberto Burri's Cretto memorializes the destroyed village by transforming the ruins into a work of art. He constructed concrete mounds to represent the village's lost structures, creating a physical reminder of both the tragic past and the collective memory of the community. This artistic approach contributes to the dialogue about loss and regeneration, while also addressing issues of economic sustainability in the area.

Consider a memorial built on the site of a historic disaster; it serves both as a reminder of what was lost and as a focal point for healing and remembrance. Much like how monoliths or sculptures can help communities remember significant events, Cretto does the same in a physical and artistic form.

--