3.2. Long-term Commitment Issues

In the present conditions one has to understand that many migrated fishermen have understood that a lot of fish available here and they started migrating to these places and they had adopted different various advanced fishing techniques. And they are not necessarily environmentally friendly, but they might have used a dynamite, the fine nets that catch even a very small fish fry, and the pounding of the coral reefs to drive fish into the nets, all created problems of overfishing and the destruction of the environment when the fish live where the fish live and multiply.

Many fishermen have moved to new areas because they are attracted by the large number of fish available. To catch more fish, they’ve adopted advanced fishing methods which often harm the environment. This includes using dynamite and fine nets that catch even the smallest fish, leading to overfishing and damaging coral reefs, where many species reproduce.

Imagine a local farmer who discovers a new field full of ripe fruits. To maximize his harvest, he starts using techniques that damage the soil and the surrounding plants. While he might harvest a lot of crops initially, he ultimately destroys the ecosystem that once supported his farming.

With the fish gone, they move on to another Island that is what these Tagbanwa myths were no relevance to the fearless migrant, and in fact with these migrated fishermen coming into the picture even this Tagbanwa learned new fishing techniques that did not go against their beliefs. That is how it has an impact of one do not understand the cultural aspects and how different cultures understand their ecosystems on the environment.

When the fish stocks decrease due to overfishing, migrated fishermen often move to new locations. This results in a loss of cultural beliefs, like the Tagbanwa myths that guide local fishing practices responsibly. Their traditions often promote sustainable practices that preserve the ecosystem. However, the newcomers may not prioritize these beliefs, leading to the adoption of harmful fishing methods.

Think about a group of friends who have played a game by their own set of rules for years. A new player joins but doesn’t respect these rules, causing the game to change for the worse. The original friends may lose enjoyment and the spirit of the game as the new player dominates without understanding the previously valued principles.

With this what you can see that how the coral reefs have been damaged and because of using the Dynamites and poisoned by sodium cyanide which used for bringing in live fish. So now one can see them, one can witness how it has an impact on the coral reefs you know one certain coral reef has been damaged and obviously it affects the marine system, the marine system is affected when aqua system is affected. It also affects the human systems, so there is a chain process.

The use of dynamite and harmful chemicals like sodium cyanide to catch fish severely damages coral reefs. These ecosystems are essential to marine life, so their degradation impacts the entire aquatic system. When marine life suffers, the communities depending on fishing for their livelihoods also struggle, demonstrating the interconnectedness of environmental and human health.

Consider a garden where the flowers and plants support bees. If someone uses harmful chemicals to remove weeds, it not only kills the weeds but also harms the bees and flowers. Eventually, the absence of bees leads to fewer fruits and vegetables for the gardener, showing how one action can destroy multiple layers of an ecosystem.

So these are some of the interesting facts that how local cultures understand the ecosystem and the environment, how these myths also protect the environment but when the foreign intrusions come, how they get impacted, and one do not understand the other cultures interest and knowledge.

Local cultures often have deep-rooted knowledge and myths that help to protect their environments. However, when new people come into these areas, they may not understand or respect the local practices, resulting in negative impacts on the ecosystem. This illustrates the importance of respecting and integrating traditional knowledge in environmental management.

Imagine a chef who specializes in traditional cuisine. If a new chef comes in and ignores the original recipes, the flavors and essence of the dishes might be lost. Similarly, the intrusion of different fishing methods can undermine the traditional knowledge that protects the ecosystem.

There is a spatial scale challenges when we talk about the climate change it talks about its very it talks up to much bigger scales, larger scales whereas the disaster it talks about much more to the pointed affected areas. So it is very difficult to bring them together, for instance, when we talk about a flood impact in somewhere in Bihar it may not necessarily that the impact the cause is from the same place it might have been the cause the root cause might be in some other country which is in China.

Addressing climate change involves recognizing that its effects can be widespread and may not originate close to the areas that suffer. For example, a flood in one area may be caused by policies or events occurring in another country. This spatial disconnect complicates how we respond to climate issues because it blurs boundaries between local and global responsibilities.

Think about a traffic jam caused by a construction project several miles away. While you might be stuck in traffic, the root issue is far from your location. This shows how interconnected systems can create impacts that are felt in multiple locations, complicating problem-solving.

Also, the temporal and functional challenges; when we talk about the temporal and functional challenges, it is also about the role of different agencies whether it is an NGO or a government sector or quasi-government which whoever are coming so especially the NGOs who are coming the agencies to do the disaster recovery projects. They are here on a contract, they are here to do certain targeted work. Whether it is a livelihood dimension, whether it is a shelter dimension, they finish that, and they move on, their visas are also expire, and they move on.

There are challenges associated with different agencies, such as NGOs, that respond to disasters. These agencies often work on limited contracts to address certain needs but may not stay long enough to ensure lasting change or recovery. Once their projects are finished, no one is left to support ongoing needs or evaluate the impact on the community, leaving gaps in long-term development.

Consider a volunteer who helps out at a soup kitchen just for a month. While they provide immediate relief during their time there, once they leave, there may be no one to replace them, resulting in the kitchen struggling to serve those in need. This highlights the importance of ongoing support for lasting solutions.

--