Practice Aims of the Report - 5.1 | 11. Build Back Better in Nepal Recovery | Disaster Preparedness & Planning - Vol 4
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

Define 'Build Back Better'.

💡 Hint: Think about the context of disaster recovery.

Question 2

Easy

What are public-private partnerships?

💡 Hint: Consider who partners with whom in recovery efforts.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What does the acronym BBB stand for?

  • Better Building Bases
  • Build Back Better
  • Basic Building Blocks

💡 Hint: Consider what this acronym implies for disaster recovery.

Question 2

True or False: The Sendai Framework specifically emphasizes only physical infrastructure.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Reflect on the different dimensions of recovery emphasized by the framework.

Solve 1 more question and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Propose a detailed strategy for integrating BBB principles into the educational rebuilding efforts following a disaster. What stakeholders should be involved?

💡 Hint: Consider the various players involved in education and recovery.

Question 2

Evaluate the long-term implications of ignoring social dimensions in rebuilding post-disaster. What might the community look like in 5-10 years?

💡 Hint: Think about the importance of community cohesion for resilience.

Challenge and get performance evaluation