Practice Scaling Up Learning from Good Practices - 1.8 | 13. Building Back Better Approach | Disaster Preparedness & Planning - Vol 4
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What does GESI stand for?

💡 Hint: Think about the importance of gender in community involvement.

Question 2

Easy

Name one benefit of using local resources.

💡 Hint: Consider elements that contribute to economic stability in the community.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What does 'build back better' primarily focus on?

  • Economical Reconstruction
  • Safer and Resilient Reconstruction
  • Rapid Recovery

💡 Hint: Think about improving rather than simply recovering.

Question 2

True or False: Decentralization makes decision-making more complex.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Think about where decisions are made and by whom.

Solve 1 more question and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Analyze a case where GESI was successfully integrated into a disaster recovery effort. Discuss the outcomes and lessons learned.

💡 Hint: Look for case studies that detail stakeholder involvement and measurable outcomes.

Question 2

Design a program proposal that addresses both climate change and disaster risk reduction in a local community.

💡 Hint: Consider how you can intertwine environmental factors with disaster preparedness.

Challenge and get performance evaluation