Practice Land Degradation and Adaptation Techniques - 2.1 | 3. Coping Strategies of Urban Poor in Dhaka | Disaster Preparedness & Planning - Vol 4
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What is one adaptation strategy used in Dhaka to cope with flooding?

💡 Hint: Think about how they modify their living conditions.

Question 2

Easy

What is the definition of resilience in relation to climate change?

💡 Hint: What does it mean to bounce back?

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What percentage of the urban poor in Bangladesh live in Dhaka?

  • 50%
  • 63%
  • 75%

💡 Hint: Look at the statistics shared about urban populations.

Question 2

True or False: Urban poor communities do not utilize traditional farming techniques.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Think about how techniques can be adapted for urban settings.

Solve 1 more question and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Analyze the effectiveness of community-led adaptation versus technology-driven solutions in urban settings. Which approach is more sustainable and why?

💡 Hint: Consider long-term impacts and accessibility.

Question 2

Examine how understanding the socio-economic context of urban poor can inform better planning for adaptation strategies. What factors should planners consider?

💡 Hint: Reflect on how social structures impact planning.

Challenge and get performance evaluation