Practice Reflecting on Investment in Technology vs. Social Empowerment - 3.2 | 3. Coping Strategies of Urban Poor in Dhaka | Disaster Preparedness & Planning - Vol 4
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What is meant by urban poor?

💡 Hint: Think about what factors contribute to poverty in cities.

Question 2

Easy

Give one example of a coping strategy used by urban communities.

💡 Hint: Consider how physical modifications can help.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What percentage of the urban poor in Bangladesh live in Dhaka?

  • 40%
  • 63%
  • 80%

💡 Hint: Recall the statistics mentioned in details.

Question 2

True or False: Investment in technology is the only solution for climate adaptation.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Consider the examples discussed regarding community initiatives.

Solve and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Develop a multifaceted approach for urban resilience that integrates both technology and social empowerment. Discuss potential challenges and benefits.

💡 Hint: Think about the roles of community leaders and local government.

Question 2

Critically assess the long-term effects of technological solutions in urban settings, focusing on accessibility and sustainability.

💡 Hint: Consider examples from different cities and their technological adaptations.

Challenge and get performance evaluation