Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today we'll discuss the Sustainable Livelihoods Framework. It emphasizes how individuals and groups access resources and the importance of assets in organizing livelihoods.
How do cultural factors fit into this framework?
Great question! Cultural factors significantly influence how communities manage their resources and make choices. This goes beyond economic necessity.
So, it's not just about money, but also traditions and social practices?
Exactly! Cultural dimensions shape individuals' identities and their responses to challenges. This is crucial for developing effective recovery strategies.
Are there models or theories that explain this dynamic?
Yes, authors like Bourdieu and Lim provide insights into these cultural dynamics, which we’ll discuss more.
Can you summarize what we’ve learned?
Certainly! We explored how cultural factors influence livelihoods in disaster contexts, and the importance of integrating cultural understanding into recovery efforts.
Now, let’s delve into Bourdieu’s theory of cultural capital. What do you think cultural capital involves?
I believe it’s about the different types of capital we acquire through society.
Correct! Bourdieu speaks of three different types: inherited, objectified, and institutional capital.
Can you explain objectified capital?
Sure! Objectified capital refers to the cultural goods individuals can own, like art or literature, which can influence their position in society.
And how does this relate to disasters?
Cultural capital impacts how communities recover from disasters; those with richer cultural capitals may have better access to recovery resources.
Can you summarize this session?
Certainly! We explored Bourdieu’s cultural capital theory and its three forms, and how they relate to community resilience.
Next, let’s examine cultural interaction. What components do you think shape a community's identity?
Religion and family structure seem important.
Correct! According to Lim’s model, aspects such as religion, ecology, and gender roles all contribute to identity, impacting vulnerability.
How do these affect recovery after a disaster?
They shape community responses and facilitate or hinder recovery efforts depending on their interactions.
Can you give examples of these interactions?
Certainly! For instance, a community with strong kinship ties may be more effective in organizing support after a disaster.
Quick summary, please!
We discussed how cultural components, such as family and religion, affect a community's identity and its recovery process.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section elaborates on the significant relationship between culture, vulnerability, and development, emphasizing how cultural dimensions influence the livelihood choices of communities affected by disasters. The importance of integrating cultural perspectives into recovery processes is highlighted to enhance effectiveness and ensure the needs of affected communities are met.
In this section, we explore the intricate relationship between cultural dimensions and vulnerability, particularly in the context of disaster recovery. The discussion begins with the sustainable livelihoods framework, developed in 1997, which posits that individuals and groups access resources as assets crucial for organizing their livelihoods. This framework underscores the importance of not only economic factors but also cultural elements that inform livelihood choices. Through a review of various literature, including the works of Bourdieu, Dovey, Leach, and Lim, we examine how cultural capital shapes community responses and resilience in the face of disasters. Lim’s model is used to analyze various components such as religion, ecology, family structure, and gender roles that contribute to identity formation. Additionally, the narrative addresses the failed consideration of cultural dimensions in existing post-disaster humanitarian efforts, leading to disadvantageous outcomes for affected communities. Ultimately, the section posits that understanding these cultural influences in recovery processes is essential for effective assistance and development outcomes.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
There is also sustainable livelihoods framework which talks about the asset framework where it is a different model in 1997, which they have developed how the individuals or groups access the resources which are basically an assets to organize their livelihoods and how the capacities make them able to act engage and change the world. Apart from this, Tony Lloyd Jones and Carole Rakodi. Also propose that there is also the futures like how the infrastructure and development has an impact in those access to these assets and the vulnerability context.
This chunk discusses frameworks that help understand how people manage their livelihoods. The sustainable livelihoods framework looks at how individuals access resources (assets) that help them organize their livelihoods. It emphasizes the importance of capacities that enable people to act effectively in their environment. Additionally, it notes that infrastructure and development play significant roles in determining how these resources can be accessed, which directly relates to vulnerability.
Imagine a farmer in a rural area. If he has access to good quality soil (asset) and irrigation facilities (infrastructure), he can cultivate his land effectively. However, if the infrastructure is inadequate, like a broken irrigation system, his ability to access the resources he needs declines, making him more vulnerable to drought.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
But here, the thing is it is not just for the economic necessity where households or groups act upon. But it is with the cultural factors which people manage the results and make their livelihood choices to act upon.
This chunk highlights that besides economic necessity, cultural factors are crucial in shaping how individuals and groups make decisions regarding their livelihoods. People do not act solely based on economic needs; their choices are also influenced by cultural practices, values, and social norms that guide their behavior and decision-making.
Think about how different families might choose to spend their money. A family with strong cultural ties to education may prioritize funding for schooling over luxury items, even if they could afford both. Their cultural values dictate what they perceive as essential for their future.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, this is where I started reviewing a variety of literature starting from Bourdieu’s cultural capital. Kim Dovey’s work on framing places, Neil Leach work and Regina Lim’s work. So, this is where I started revealing a lot of literature on what is culture and that is where I try to adopt certain literatures and made a framework in my research, in order to understand the role of culture, in the disaster development process.
In this chunk, the author mentions significant works by theorists such as Bourdieu and Dovey, which focus on cultural capital—how cultural resources impact the lives of individuals and communities. By reviewing various literature, the author aims to create a framework for understanding how cultural dynamics interact with vulnerability and development, especially during disasters.
Consider a community that has a rich cultural heritage of storytelling. After a disaster, this cultural practice can help maintain social cohesion and provide emotional support, facilitating recovery. Understanding this cultural aspect can be essential for development agencies to plan effective recovery strategies.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Here, the culture is defined as the sum of total human experiences and accumulated indigenous knowledge within the space because, I am looking from the built environment perspective that communities rely on giving meanings to their lives and places delivered through which people habitually develop an approach to survive their everyday life, whether it is in a pre-disaster situation or a post disaster situation.
This chunk defines culture as the collective human experiences and indigenous knowledge of a community. The built environment's perspective emphasizes that this culture gives meaning to people's lives and influences their survival strategies, both before and after disasters.
For example, a coastal community may have traditional fishing techniques that have been passed down for generations. When disaster strikes, these techniques can be critical to quickly restoring their livelihoods, showcasing how deeply embedded cultural practices shape resilience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, mainly my argument lies on how the cultural dimensions of the local communities are not effectively and sufficiently addressed in the current post-disaster for humanitarian and development process.
The author argues that humanitarian and development processes often overlook the cultural dimensions of local communities in post-disaster recovery. This neglect can lead to ineffective recovery strategies that do not resonate with the affected populations.
If a relief organization provides food and water without considering the food preferences and cultural practices of the community, it may not only fail to meet their needs but also undermine their dignity and social structures, delaying recovery.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Cultural Interaction: The interplay between various cultural factors that shape community identity.
Vulnerability: The increased susceptibility to harm or difficulty in disaster situations, influenced by cultural contexts.
Sustainable Framework: A holistic approach to understanding how communities access and utilize resources for their livelihoods.
Cultural Capital: The assets of knowledge, skills, and education that influence a person's social mobility and resilience.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
A fishing community utilizing traditional ecological knowledge to rebuild after a tsunami, showcasing cultural resilience.
The integration of local customs and practices in rebuilding efforts leading to faster recovery in affected areas.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
Cultural factors as guides, help in recovery tides.
Imagine a village where traditions hold strong; after a disaster, these bonds help them belong.
Remember C.U.R.E.: Culture, Unity, Resilience, Economy.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Cultural Dimensionality
Definition:
Refers to the various cultural factors and contexts influencing human behavior and decisions.
Term: Sustainable Livelihoods Framework
Definition:
A model that examines people's access to resources and their strategies for achieving livelihood goals.
Term: Cultural Capital
Definition:
A concept that encompasses the non-economic resources that enable social mobility, such as education, skills, and cultural knowledge.
Term: Disaster Recovery
Definition:
The process of rebuilding and restoring communities after a disaster.
Term: Vulnerability Context
Definition:
The factors influencing a community's susceptibility to harm or difficulty in disaster situations.