1.2. Influence of Culture on Livelihood Choices

But here, the thing is it is not just for the economic necessity where households or groups act upon. But it is with the cultural factors which people manage the results and make their livelihood choices to act upon.

This chunk emphasizes that people's livelihood choices are influenced not only by their economic needs but also by their cultural backgrounds. For example, in some cultures, certain occupations may be favored or discouraged due to traditional beliefs or community values. Understanding these cultural factors is essential when studying how communities decide what livelihoods to pursue.

Imagine a community where fishing is a traditional way of life. Even if some individuals see more profit in farming, they may choose to continue fishing out of respect for their culture and the generational practices of their ancestors. This shows how culture can dictate not just choices, but the identity of a community.

There is also sustainable livelihoods framework which talks about the asset framework where it is a different model in 1997, which they have developed how the individuals or groups access the resources which are basically an assets to organize their livelihoods...

The sustainable livelihoods framework introduced in 1997 helps analyze how people access various assets (natural, physical, human, financial, and social) to establish their livelihoods. Each of these assets plays a role in how individuals make choices that reflect their cultural and social contexts. For instance, social capital can help in forming community networks that support job opportunities.

Think of this framework like a toolbox. If a person has access to a diverse set of tools (or resources), they are better equipped to solve their livelihood challenges, just as a carpenter can build better furniture with a complete set of tools compared to someone with just a hammer.

I spoke about the Bourdieu’s theory which talks about the cultural capital which is the inherited capital, the objectified capital and the institutional capital inherited...

Bourdieu’s theory of cultural capital explains how different forms of capital save communities shape their identities and choices. Inherited capital refers to the qualities individuals gain from family, while objectified capital can be seen in possessions and skills. Institutional capital involves academic credentials and prestige, impacting one's opportunities and choices in livelihoods.

Imagine two individuals from different backgrounds: one from a wealthy family with access to elite educational institutions, and another from a low-income family with fewer resources. The first individual might find it easier to secure high-paying jobs due to their higher cultural capital, while the second may struggle despite having similar skills, demonstrating how cultural capital influences livelihood choices.

One has to look at you know, it is not necessarily that we go back to the situation where it was, because people as developed and talks about people...

This chunk discusses how modernization and globalization affect people's traditional ways of making a living. While some might want to stick to their customs, modern influences can push communities toward different livelihood options, sometimes leading to conflicts between preserving culture and adapting to new economic opportunities.

Consider a farmer in a rural area who grows crops based on tradition. As corporations introduce modern agricultural techniques promising higher yields, the farmer faces a choice between maintaining traditional farming practices and adopting new methods that may change the social fabric of the community.

My argument lies on how the cultural dimensions of the local communities are not effectively and sufficiently addressed in the current post-disaster for humanitarian and development process...

In post-disaster scenarios, the argument presented is that cultural dimensions of affected communities often get overlooked in planning and recovery efforts. When rebuilding efforts ignore cultural identity and local practices, it can undermine community resilience and lead to less successful recovery.

For example, in a disaster recovery effort, if a community's traditional building styles and methods are ignored, the new structures might not be embraced by the residents. They may feel disconnected from their identity and community, which can hinder their overall recovery.

--