Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today, we're exploring the cultural theory of risk, which emphasizes that our perceptions of risk are deeply influenced by cultural affiliations. Can anyone summarize how cultural perspectives impact our views on risk?
I think it means that different cultures see risks differently, right?
Yes, like what's considered pure or polluted can vary from one culture to another.
Exactly! This cultural lens is essential to understanding how societies respond to risks. It's like looking through a filter that changes what we see. For instance, dietary laws can reflect deeper cultural beliefs about purity.
Can you give an example of that?
Sure! Take the Jewish dietary restrictions against eating pork. It's tied to notions of purity and health, illustrating how culture shapes risk perceptions.
So, risk isn't just about the actual danger but also about cultural beliefs?
Exactly! Remember, the word 'risk' itself is interpreted through cultural norms and beliefs.
To summarize, our understanding of risks is filtered through cultural values, shaping how we categorize and respond to them.
Let's delve into some historical examples. Can anyone think of a time when cultural beliefs influenced perceptions of risk?
What about during the water quality crisis in 14th century Europe?
Great example! The Jewish population was unfairly blamed for contaminating water sources, driven by cultural prejudices. This shows how risk perceptions can lead to scapegoating.
So, the cultural context turned a health issue into a social scapegoat?
Exactly! By understanding cultural narratives, we can grasp why societies react to risks in specific ways.
And this could help in designing better disaster recovery strategies, right?
Absolutely! Recognizing these cultural nuances allows us to build back better by integrating cultural understandings into recovery plans.
In summary, cultural contexts play a crucial role in shaping perceptions and responses to risks which can have significant ramifications for disaster recovery efforts.
Mary Douglas proposed a grid and group model to better categorize cultures. How do you think these two elements affect our understanding of risk?
I guess it shows us who interacts in a community and how serious the rules are!
Exactly! The 'grid' relates to the rules individuals follow in a culture, while the 'group' pertains to how connected individuals are within their community.
So, a tight-knit community with strict rules would see risks differently compared to a loose community with more relaxed norms?
Precisely! The density of social networks affects how risk is perceived and managed.
That must influence how people respond to disasters, right?
Absolutely! Understanding these interactions can improve disaster response strategies by tailoring them to community dynamics.
To summarize, the grid and group model aids in analyzing how cultural contexts define risk perceptions and community interactions.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
Focusing on the cultural dimensions of risk perception, this section discusses Mary Douglas's cultural theory which categorizes cultures based on social interactions and regulatory norms, alongside examples illustrating how cultural beliefs shape views on risks, purity, and pollution.
This section of the lecture series by Prof. Subhajyoti Samaddar from the Disaster Prevention Research Institute at Kyoto University delves into the cultural theory of risk, a framework established by anthropologist Mary Douglas in her classic work from 1966. The theory emphasizes that cultural affiliations significantly shape individuals' perceptions of risk, delineating what is considered pure or polluting within various cultures.
Douglas’s theory categorizes cultures based on two critical elements: the 'group', which refers to whom individuals interact with, and the 'grid', which pertains to how they interact.
Cultural examples, such as dietary restrictions among Jewish people and gender roles among the Hima tribe in Uganda, illustrate how cultural context determines risk behavior and social norms. Furthermore, the historical scapegoating of Jews during the water quality crisis in 14th century Europe exemplifies how cultural values can dictate the allocation of responsibility in hazard events.
By utilizing a grid and group framework for cultural categorization, Douglas argues for greater generalizability in anthropological studies, highlighting the importance of understanding cultural context in interpreting risk perceptions. This theoretical approach aids in analyzing how cultural norms shape societal responses to risks, guiding disaster recovery efforts and policies aimed at building back better.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Hello everyone, welcome to the lecture series on disaster recovery and build back better; this lecture we will talk about cultural theory of risk or cultural perspective of risk. I am Subhajyoti Samaddar from DPRI, Kyoto University so, we already discussed in other lectures about the role of culture in risk perceptions. Here, in this lecture, we will focus more what the cultural theory is talking about people's risk perceptions.
This introduction sets the tone for the lecture, indicating that the focus will be on how culture influences the way people perceive risks. It suggests that the cultural theory of risk offers insights into the relationships between culture, perception, and recovery from disasters.
Think about how different communities react to natural disasters like floods or earthquakes. For example, some cultures may prioritize community-based recovery efforts, while others might focus on individual preparedness. This shows that people's views on risk and recovery can be deeply influenced by their cultural background.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
And how, this is connected with their cultural affiliation okay, so that was the book purely endangered by Mary Douglas in 1966 considered to be a modern classic of anthropology, talking about the moral risk pollution and danger okay.
Mary Douglas' work discusses how cultures define concepts of risk, pollution, and danger. This section indicates that different cultures have distinct moral frameworks that dictate which behaviors or substances are deemed 'risky' or 'clean' based on their cultural values.
For instance, in some cultures, certain foods are considered unclean or taboo, like pork in Judaism. Such cultural beliefs shape how individuals react to risks associated with consuming those foods, reflecting broader cultural views on safety.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
And she was talking about taxonomic anomalies, dietary restrictions in case of Jews, Israeli people who cannot have pork or snake as a food, okay because they are considered to be unclean like why they are unclean because they are anomalies, so taxonomic anomalies like snake, they live on land but they do not have legs so, it is very rare, so that’s why you should not eat snake. Similarly, you should not eat pork because they have cloven hooves but they don’t chew the cud, so unlike horse and cow so, these are clean who are anomalies, so you should not eat them.
This section elaborates on the idea of 'taxonomic anomalies', which refers to how certain animals have peculiar biological characteristics that cultures define as unclean. For Jews, pigs and snakes fall into this category due to their physical traits, influencing dietary laws and perception of risk.
Imagine a family that refuses to eat sushi because they're uncomfortable with the idea of raw fish, while another family thrives on it. This shows how different cultural views lead to distinct dietary restrictions and perceptions of risk.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Similarly, the other examples like in case of Hima tribe in Uganda, they depend on animal husbandry, they depend on livestock okay and that the female; it is considered that female they should not touch these live stocks, the very tribe whose livelihood depends on animal husbandry on depending on livestock rearing, they should not touch, their women should not touch live stocks.
In this context, the Hima tribe demonstrates a cultural belief that women should not interact with livestock, as it is thought that doing so would lead to the death of the animals. This belief can seem paradoxical, as women's involvement is crucial to their livelihoods.
Consider how in some cultures, women are prohibited from specific roles, despite those roles being essential for family livelihood. This cultural belief can impact the whole community's approach to risks associated with agriculture and livestock.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Similarly in case of the 14th century Europe, there was poor water quality was already an issue for a very long time but it came into kind of more outcry of the people, it is considered to be as one of the critical concern and the blame of these was given to the Jews people because they were told that Jews people are actually contaminating the water.
This section outlines a historical instance where cultural scapegoating occurred: blaming Jews for poor water quality during the 14th century. Cultural biases played a role in how risks were perceived and managed, showing how cultural narratives can lead to the victimization of certain groups.
In modern contexts, we still see scapegoating during crises, such as blaming immigrants during economic downturns. This illustrates how fear and risk can distort social perceptions and foster discrimination.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now, Mary Douglas was saying that we need to have a kind of categories of cultures... Therefore, if you are studying some culture in Africa, you cannot compare that when you are studying a culture in Asia so, the anthropologist are trained in such a way that they do not generalize their findings so, they are very localized, contextualize their findings.
Mary Douglas argues for the necessity of categorizing cultures to understand them better. She criticizes traditional anthropological approaches for being too localized and not allowing for comparative studies across cultures. By categorizing cultures, researchers can draw generalizations and apply insights across different contexts.
Think of how different schools approach education—some may focus on exams, while others prioritize project-based learning. By categorizing these educational styles, we can analyze and understand their effectiveness in various settings.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now, she is saying that we can do this by taking 2 elements; one is whom one interact and how one interact with so, whom one interact is considered to be group and how they interact is considered to be grid, okay.
In Douglas' model, the 'group' refers to the social network an individual belongs to and how often they interact with others, while the 'grid' refers to the rules and structures that govern those interactions. This model helps in understanding societal organization and the resulting cultural practices.
Picture a workplace—your 'group' could include your colleagues, and the 'grid' might be the company policies on communication. How closely you work with colleagues and how these policies shape interactions can influence workplace culture and risk management.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Group generally represent the degree of social incorporation of the individual, this result how often I am meeting someone, how dense is the network between the members of that group...
This chunk emphasizes that groups vary in their interaction frequency and solidarity. Strong groups are tightly knit with frequent interactions, while weak groups may have infrequent interactions and less shared responsibility. These dynamics can affect how risks are perceived and managed within the group.
In a close-knit community, neighbors might frequently share resources and support each other during crises. In contrast, in a competitive environment like a corporate office, employees might be less inclined to risk sharing in fear of losing their edge.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Also, we have the grid okay, the grid represents that what kind of rules and regulations I should maintain...
This section delves into how the 'grid' aspect shapes an individual’s behavior within a group. The grid comprises the established rules and norms that dictate acceptable conduct, influencing how individuals perceive and respond to risks in their social environment.
Consider a school setting where rules about bullying are strictly enforced (the grid). This can create an environment where students feel safer, thereby affecting their perceptions of risk within the school.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Cultural Theory of Risk: A framework that emphasizes the impact of cultural values on risk perception.
Grid and Group: Elements that categorize individuals within a culture based on regulatory norms and social interactions.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
Jewish dietary restrictions reflect cultural beliefs of purity and health, defining what is considered acceptable food.
The historical blame placed on Jewish communities during a water crisis illustrates scapegoating driven by cultural perceptions of pollution.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
When culture’s viewed through risk’s lens, perceptions bend, norms make amends.
Once, in a village with strict food rules, the elders believed a certain dish was cursed. When sickness ensued, they blamed the dish, reinforcing their dietary laws, teaching them that what’s pure and polluted can shape lives profoundly.
Recall G.R.I.D. (Group relationships, Rules, Interaction Dynamics), to remember how communities and their internal regulations shape risk perception.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Cultural Theory of Risk
Definition:
A theoretical framework that posits that individuals' perceptions of risk are influenced by their cultural affiliations and values.
Term: Grid
Definition:
Refers to the rules, regulations, and norms that govern behavior within a cultural group.
Term: Group
Definition:
Refers to the social networks and interactions individuals have within their culture.
Term: Scapegoating
Definition:
The practice of blaming a person or group for problems not of their making.
Term: Risk Perception
Definition:
The subjective judgment people make about the characteristics and severity of a risk.