Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today, let’s explore the cultural theory of risk. Who can tell me how cultural background might influence our perceptions of hazards?
I think it could affect what we consider dangerous, like some foods or actions that certain cultures avoid.
Exactly! In her work, Mary Douglas highlights how cultural norms dictate what is seen as pure or polluted. This leads us to how communities categorize risks based on their cultural beliefs.
Can you give an example of that?
Sure! For instance, dietary restrictions observed by the Jewish community about pork and snakes illustrate how cultural definitions of cleanliness emerge.
Why do they see those animals as unclean?
Good question! It’s because they exhibit what Douglas called 'taxonomic anomalies'. Pork animals have cloven hooves but don’t chew cud, while snakes have no legs. Such anomalies shape cultural boundaries around what is acceptable.
That sounds like it can lead to misunderstandings, especially if people don't know the cultural reasons behind those beliefs.
Absolutely! Misinterpretations can lead to blaming communities during crises, as we will see in relation to the Jews and water quality issues in Europe.
Now, let's discuss how cultural values can lead to scapegoating, particularly during crises.
Were there specific events that caused this scapegoating in the 14th century?
Yes, for example, poor water quality became a major public concern, and instead of looking for systemic causes, people blamed the Jewish community for 'contaminating' the water.
That seems really unfair. Why did they single out the Jews?
Historically, marginalized groups often face blame during societal unrest. Their differences can be misused to create scapegoats for larger problems.
So the cultural theory of risk shows how beliefs about danger can affect real people?
Exactly! It illustrates the dangerous cycle of risk perceptions leading to discrimination. This is what Douglas aimed to address — the moral dimensions of risk.
It’s interesting how these perceptions can have such a historical impact.
Now, let’s delve into how Mary Douglas's grid and group model helps in categorizing cultures.
What do you mean by 'grid' and 'group'?
Grid represents the rules and regulations of a society, while group reflects the extent of social connection within that culture. Can anyone give an example?
I think in a tight-knit village, both grid and group would be high, right?
Correct! In that scenario, strong community ties would lead to shared beliefs about risks. Conversely, in a competitive office environment, the grid might be high, but the group might be low.
Why is it important to categorize cultures this way?
It allows for better understanding and comparison of cultural attitudes towards risk. By exploring differences, we can avoid misunderstandings, especially in a multicultural world.
So understanding these categories helps explain behaviors across different societies?
Absolutely! This is why the model is crucial for anthropological studies.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section explores how cultural perspectives shaped risk perceptions during the 14th century in Europe, discussing the role of societal norms and values in the allocation of blame for calamities. It emphasizes how cultural beliefs influenced the perception of cleanliness and purity, and how these beliefs were applied to scapegoat the Jewish populace amidst public crises, such as the poor water quality.
In 14th-century Europe, societal perceptions of risk were deeply intertwined with cultural values. Influenced by Mary Douglas's cultural theory of risk, this section investigates how cultural affiliations shaped individuals' risk perceptions and moral judgments about purity and cleanliness. Through examples such as dietary restrictions among the Jewish community and the Hima tribe in Uganda, the narrative demonstrates how cultural anomalies and communal rules governed concepts of danger and safety. The persecution of Jews was partially a product of scapegoating during times of crisis, as societal outcries over poor water quality led to widespread blaming of marginalized groups. Consequently, this harmed not only the targeted community but also highlighted the significance of cultural frameworks in shaping societal responses to perceived risks.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Similarly, in case of the 14th century Europe, there was poor water quality was already an issue for a very long time but it came into kind of more outcry of the people, it is considered to be as one of the critical concern and the blame of these was given to the Jews people because they were told that Jews people are actually contaminating the water.
In the 14th century, Europe faced significant challenges regarding the quality of water available to the public. This issue had been prevalent for some time, leading to growing concern among the populace. As the quality of water deteriorated, people began to panic about their health and the possibility of disease. In a misguided attempt to find someone to blame for this crisis, the Jewish community was wrongfully accused of polluting the water supply, which led to widespread discrimination and violence against them. This illustrates how fear can lead a society to target specific groups instead of addressing the root causes of issues.
Think of a situation where a town experiences a sudden outbreak of illness, and instead of investigating the actual causes, residents start to suspect a particular group with no evidence. This mirrors how unfounded accusations can arise during times of crisis, showcasing the dangers of scapegoating.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
According to the cultural theory of risk, the allocation of responsibility of hazard event is normal strategy for protecting a particular set of values. One culture they define that this is right and this is not good, this is bad this is good, this is acceptable, this is unacceptable, this is pure, this is polluted okay, so each culture have their own values.
The cultural theory of risk suggests that societies often allocate blame for disasters or health crises as a way to protect their own cultural values and beliefs. Different cultures have unique perspectives on what is considered 'right' or 'wrong,' 'pure' or 'polluted.' When a crisis occurs, it is natural for people to seek explanations, and unfortunately, this sometimes leads to scapegoating others to preserve their cultural integrity. This highlights how culture influences perceptions of risk and responsibility.
Imagine a community that values cleanliness and health. If a flu outbreak occurs, the residents might blame a local business they perceive as unclean, even if there is no direct evidence to support this. This response illustrates how cultural values shape our perceptions of risk and lead to misdirected blame.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now, Mary Douglas was saying that we need to have a kind of categories of cultures, there we have many cultures but we can group them, categorize them.
Mary Douglas argued that due to the variety of cultures present in the world, it is essential to categorize them to facilitate better understanding and analysis. By grouping cultures based on certain characteristics, researchers can make more meaningful comparisons. Douglas highlighted that traditional anthropological studies often lack a systematic way to categorize cultures, which can lead to challenges in drawing general conclusions from localized studies.
Consider a library filled with books from different genres. Without proper categorization, finding and comparing books on similar subjects would be difficult. Similarly, by categorizing cultures, we can better analyze and understand their values and practices.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
She said that we can do it through the model called grid and group to categorize the culture to understand people's mind.
The grid and group model developed by Mary Douglas suggests two dimensions to categorize cultures. 'Grid' refers to the rules and regulations that guide interactions within a culture, while 'group' refers to the social networks and relationships between individuals. This framework allows us to better understand how various cultures function and how individuals interact within these cultural contexts.
Imagine a game of soccer. The 'grid' represents the rules of the game – how to play, what constitutes a foul, etc. The 'group' represents the players on the field – their teamwork and communication. Both elements work together to create a cohesive experience, just as grid and group work together to shape cultural dynamics.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Taxonomic anomalies
Definition:
Exceptions or irregularities within biological classifications that can shape cultural dietary rules.