And, in the last FORECAFE third stage it was designated for construction of schools, roads and health care centres, which has more to do with the public infrastructure, police stations, religious infrastructure like churches and social activity centres and FORECAFE 1, 2 and 3 together it talks about 66 crores rupees.

And first of all, making their own decisions about the construction they wanted. So, now how this decentralization process have explained, have been implemented. Now, in most of the cases being a farmer’s community and most of these individual agricultural activities, most of these families own land so that at least they have a capacity to build on their own piece of land and they could able to develop self-help construction for the following reasons.

One is farmers have skills and knowledge in construction, their extended families allow many people to work on each dwelling and because as I said to you earlier, it is a family businesses, their regular season of harvesting was almost 5 months after the disaster leaving the peasants with free time for other activities.

Construction materials including bamboo were available locally in that region and at least if some elderly people or if they are unable to make their own can self-built self-help construction then still the labour was easily accessible and they were affordable as well and rural communities have a deep-rooted sense of mutual cooperation.

So, the process of FORECAFE 1 and 2 fund in the housing reconstruction, first, once the society the individuals when they realize the housing needs and economic needs so they actually made their understanding of their requirements in a piece of paper and they drafted that in what they want and that is where the engineers or specialists about 17 engineers were working in order to assist them with the technical expertise.

And what are the ways they were assisting, approval of hazard resistant quality of the units so it could be a 2 bedroom and a kitchen and 1 small toilet, approval of the conformance of the construction with ecological and environmental standards and approval of the monthly construction payments?

For these 3 options, they have been getting some support, one is the individual option, the second one is houses from other NGOs programs and a program of prefabricated houses promoted by the coffee grower’s organizations.

And there are also some service infrastructure investments which has happened some families they could able to reconstruct part of their house and also the septic tank for their service component. And, there are different processes which went on one is how the subsidies have been supporting and in the 3 phases, one is the emergency phase.

In the permanent phase about 9,800 houses have been rebuilt and which 6,648 house for coffee growers or coffee workers and others 4,700 production related structures for like the coffee beans filtering processes or any other industrial purposes or packaging purposes.

Apart from this, there is also the soft outputs which is about 10,000 direct and indirect jobs have been created, information and education for residents and construction companies, which have participated and collaborated in exhibition.

Of course, for any project, there are always some downturns. In this segment, in this whole project, because it’s a coffee growers associations which I working on, the coverage of informal dwellers because informal sector is very significant aspect in Colombia which has not been addressed.

So, there is no transfer of knowledge what the learning they have gained in this process and how it can be transferred to the future reconstruction projects.

I think this gives you a good example of how the bottom-up approach. And also giving a variety of to the farmers needs and you know how the decentralized approach will have helped the coffee growers and to come up with their needs and wants and certain fund supports have been provided by the government and as other private sectors.