are the constraints like if I am a particular member of a particular group, will they allow me to have an orientation of homosexual or will they allow me to have equal rights for the women so, feminism, a kind of homosexuality how one see; one group see that is a kind of the rule of the group. Some group permits, some group do not permit okay so, it is a kind of law, hierarchy, kinship, race, gender that how it is viewed this is in a group, this is called grid okay.

So, we have like low grid where everybody is equal, egalitarian state of affairs, no one is prevented to participate in any kind of activities or social role depending irrespective of their race, gender, age or so forth, everybody is considered to be equal. In other case, where extreme we have high grid panel here, we can see that people are restricted; their activities are restricted based on caste, creed, class.

So, group when low, it is; the networks are radical, when high it is interconnected, in case of interactions low groups are rare, high groups are frequent, boundaries of interactions among individuals in case of low group is open and in case of high group is closed, shared groups like few, high groups are many.

In case of grid, when the grid is low that means in a particular group, particular community, particular society, the low and high is like horizontal and vertical, one is very hierarchical one is very equal okay, specializations; in low group it’s very little, people are all have similar kind of activities, they don’t have any specializations, in high group there is lot of specializations, lot of division of labour, people are divided, segregated.

And allocation of roles is like achievement what you are; what you have achieved but in case of high, it is like ascribed, what your father was, what your mother was, whatever ancestor was, you become like caste system, okay and resource allocations; in case of low grid, it is like egalitarian, everybody is equal, everybody has the same opportunity but in case your hierarchical; in high, it is hierarchical. There some elite people have better access, the other people those who don’t have they have little access or little power to accessize.

For the individualist, they believe that nature is like no matter how much human disturb it, it will; they can handle it, nature can handle it, it is super-powerful, so for your own well-being, for your own achievement for your own success, you can utilize the nature as much as you wish and okay, this myth of nature shows that there is no need for control or cooperations, people are free to use the nature.

In case of egalitarian which is kind of they see that actually the it’s very opposite of the individualistic any, they think that that nature is very vulnerable, any little mistake nature will come crashing down okay, like a ball balanced on a hill, if we just touch it, it will fall so, we need lot of control, lot of control okay and cooperation is necessary to protect yourself from that kind of threat okay.