Practice Numerical Methods - 2.6 | 3. Facilitating Community-Based Disaster Risk Management (CBDRM) | Disaster Preparedness & Planning - Vol 7
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What does CBDRM stand for?

💡 Hint: Think about community involvement in disaster management.

Question 2

Easy

Name one key feature of nominal methods.

💡 Hint: Think about data gathering.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What does CBDRM emphasize?

  • Top-down management
  • Community involvement
  • Private sector profit

💡 Hint: Consider who is actively participating.

Question 2

True or False: Trust is essential for effective CBDRM.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Think about the relationships in disaster management.

Solve 2 more questions and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Design a small-scale CBDRM plan for a hypothetical community affected by seasonal flooding. Outline trust-building strategies with local leaders and assessment tools you would use.

💡 Hint: Think about who will lead the community meetings and how you'll gather data.

Question 2

Evaluate the effectiveness of integrating local vulnerability assessments into national disaster plans. Provide examples from real-world scenarios where this has worked or failed.

💡 Hint: Consider the outcomes of plans based on local versus generic data.

Challenge and get performance evaluation