Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today, we'll be discussing symmetric relations. A relation R between two sets A and B is symmetric if whenever an element a from A relates to an element b from B, the opposite also holds true. That is, if (a, b) is in R, then (b, a) must also be present.
So, it's like a two-way street? If I walk to your house, that means you should also walk back to mine?
Exactly, that's a great way to visualize it! You can remember it by thinking of pairs dancing elegantly, each with their partner. If one dances with the other, the relationship is reciprocated.
What happens if (a, b) is in R but (b, a) is not?
In that case, the relation would not be symmetric. It would be considered asymmetric or non-symmetric. Keep that visual of the dance in mind; if one partner doesn't reciprocate the dance step, it's not symmetric!
Now, let's talk about how we can represent symmetric relations in a matrix. If we have a relation R represented in an n x n matrix, for each pair (i, j), if R(i, j) = 1, that means (i, j) is a part of the relation, then R(j, i) must also be 1.
So, it always has to be mirrored across the diagonal?
Correct! If you visualize the matrix, the symmetry reflects through the diagonal line. Can anyone give an example of what a symmetric matrix might look like?
"Would a matrix like this work?
Let’s dive into some examples. If our set A is {1, 2}, the relation R = {(1, 1), (2, 2), (1, 2)} is reflexive but not symmetric because it lacks (2, 1). Can anyone identify why it fails to be symmetric?
Oh, because even though we have one relation from 1 to 2, we don’t have the reverse relation from 2 to 1?
Exactly! What about if we adjust it to include both pairs? Would that make it symmetric?
Yes, if we have both (1, 2) and (2, 1), then R would be symmetric!
That's right! It’s essential to check both ways for symmetry. Let’s briefly recap what we learned from examples.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section elaborates on the definition of symmetric relations, contrasting them with other types of relations, such as irreflexive and transitive. It provides examples of symmetric relations within specific sets, while also addressing misconceptions about relationships among reflexive, symmetric, and antisymmetric relations.
In this section, we explore symmetric relations, which are special types of relations defined from set A to set B. A relation R is symmetric if whenever an element a from set A is related to an element b from set B, then b must also be related to a. This is represented as: if (a, b) ∈ R, then (b, a) must also be in R.
Overall, this section on symmetric relations emphasizes their foundational role in understanding more complex relational properties in mathematics.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now let us define symmetric relations. This relation can be defined from a set A to B where B might be different from A. So, the relation is from A to B and we say it is symmetric, so as the name suggests symmetric we want here the following to hold: whenever a is related to b as per the relation R, we need that b also should be related to a and that is why the term symmetric here.
A symmetric relation establishes a two-way connection between elements of two sets. If one element, say 'a', is connected to another element 'b', then 'b' must also be connected back to 'a'. This property is crucial in certain mathematical contexts, as it indicates mutual relationships.
Think of a friendship between two people. If person A is friends with person B, then it naturally implies that person B is also friends with person A. Thus, the friendship relationship is symmetric.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
It is easy to see that the matrix for a symmetric relation will always be a symmetric matrix, because if you have a R b, that means the i, jth entry will be 1, and since my relation is symmetric, that means I will also have (b, a) to be present. That means if I take the transpose of M, then in the jth row and ith column, the entry will be 1.
In the context of matrices, a symmetric relation can be represented in a matrix form where the entries reflect the relationships between elements. If the entry at position (i, j) in the matrix is 1 (indicating a relation), the entry at (j, i) must also be 1 due to the symmetric property. Thus, a symmetric matrix remains unchanged when transposed.
Imagine a friendship graph where each person is a node. If person A is friends with person B, the graph shows an edge from A to B and also from B to A. This results in a symmetric adjacency matrix where the connections are mirrored.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
This does not mean that you need every element of the form (a, b) and (b, a) to be present in the relation R; this is an implication. The implication here says that if (a, b) is present in R, then only you need (b, a) to be present in R.
It's important to note that not every pair (a, b) and (b, a) must be present in a symmetric relation. The requirement is conditional: if (a, b) exists, then (b, a) must also exist. However, if (a, b) does not exist, the presence or absence of (b, a) is irrelevant for determining symmetry.
Consider pairs of shoes. If you have a left shoe (a) that matches with a right shoe (b), you also have the matching right shoe that goes with the left. However, if you only have a left shoe, it doesn't mean the right shoe must be present. The relationship is only intrinsic when both shoes are present.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Let us do this example, I have set A = {1, 2} and I am defining various binary relations from A to A itself. Now which of the following relations are symmetric? The first relation is a symmetric relation because this condition is true here. I can say that since (1, 1) is present in the relation, I also have (1, 1) present in the relation. Similarly the relation R is a symmetric relation.
In this example, the students can consider set A consisting of two elements. When defining various relations, it's crucial to identify which relationships meet the symmetry criterion. The presence of pairs like (1, 1) indicates a self-relation, which also satisfies the symmetry condition. Observing pairs helps in determining the symmetric status of given relations.
Using the same friendship analogy, if each friend considers the other as their friend (like both A and B are friends with each other), then their relationship is symmetric. For various friendships, we check if their connections remain two-way.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, here is a question for you, can I say that every reflexive relation is also a symmetric relation? So, remember reflexive relation means every element of the form (a, a) will represent in R. And apart from that I might have something additional also present in the relation.
The statement that every reflexive relation is symmetric is not universally true. A reflexive relation ensures that every element relates to itself (like (a, a) for every 'a'). But it doesn't guarantee that distinct elements will relate symmetrically. A counterexample can easily illustrate this discrepancy.
Imagine a group of students where each student claims their own work as outstanding (this represents reflexivity). Just because each student acknowledges their own work doesn't imply they all praise each other's work equally, illustrating the differences in reflexive versus symmetric relations.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Symmetric Relation: A relation where if (a, b) is in R, then (b, a) must also be in R.
Matrix Representation: Symmetric matrices exhibit mirrored behavior across the diagonal.
Reflexive Relation: A special kind of relation where (a, a) is always in R.
Asymmetric Relation: A relation where if (a, b) is in R, then (b, a) cannot be in R.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
For set A = {1, 2}, R = {(1, 1), (2, 1), (1, 2)} is not symmetric as it lacks (2, 1).
The relation R = {(1, 2), (2, 1)} is symmetric because both pairs exist.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
Symmetric pairs, a dance we share, if one is there, the other must care.
Imagine two friends crossing a bridge. If one friend comes to visit, the other must follow. This illustrates the essence of symmetric relations.
Think of 'S' in symmetric as standing for 'Swap' to remember that swaps happen in symmetric relations.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Symmetric Relation
Definition:
A relation R is symmetric if whenever (a, b) is in R, then (b, a) is also in R.
Term: Matrix Representation
Definition:
A mathematical representation of a relation using a matrix where rows and columns correspond to elements of the set.
Term: Reflexive Relation
Definition:
A relation R is reflexive if (a, a) is in R for every element a of the set.
Term: Asymmetric Relation
Definition:
A relation R that is asymmetric if whenever (a, b) is in R, (b, a) is not in R.