Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today, we're going to talk about transitive relations. Can anyone tell me what they think a transitive relation is?
I think it's when one element relates to another, and that one relates to a third?
Exactly! If we have an element `a` that relates to `b`, and `b` relates to `c`, we need `a` to relate to `c`. This demonstrates the essence of transitivity.
Could you give an example?
Certainly! If we say that 'if a person is a parent of another, and that person is a parent of a third, then the first person is also a grandparent of the third.' This is a real-life example of transitive relation!
Now, how can we represent transitive relations? This can be done using matrices. If we have a relation represented as a matrix, how would we denote transitivity?
I think we would need to find `1` in different positions depending on whether `a` and `b` relate and so on?
Exactly! If `(a, b)` and `(b, c)` are both `1`, then we should also check if `(a, c)` is `1`. Remember, if both conditions hold, then our relation is transitive!
What about a graph representation?
Good question! In graphs, if you have an edge from `a` to `b` and from `b` to `c`, you should also have an edge going directly from `a` to `c`.
Let's think of some examples. If we have a relation R with pairs: (1, 2), (2, 3), do we have transitivity?
Yes, because we have (1, 3) as well that would keep it transitive.
Correct! Now, if we had (1, 2) and (2, 3), but we did not have (1, 3), would our relation still be transitive?
No, it wouldn't be transitive.
Exactly! To verify if a relation is transitive, every pair must be accounted for.
Transitive relations are one of many types. Can anyone tell me a type of relation that is different from transitive?
Asymmetric relations?
Correct! Asymmetric relations can't have the mutual relationship between two distinct elements. Unlike transitive, which deals with connectedness, asymmetric relates to the directionality of those relations.
Wow, so they are interconnected but different!
Exactly! Each type of relation emphasizes different aspects of relationships in sets.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section explains several special types of relations including irreflexive, symmetric, asymmetric, and antisymmetric relations finally detailing transitive relations. It highlights conditions for each type with visual and matrix representations, and provides practical examples for better understanding.
This section introduces multiple special types of relations defined on sets, particularly focusing on transitive relations. A transitive relation is defined as one where if an element a
is related to b
, and b
is related to c
, then a
must also be related to c
. The significance of this property is illustrated through various examples, outlining how transitive relations can be represented graphically and via matrices. The text also discusses properties of related relations such as irreflexive, symmetric, asymmetric, and antisymmetric relations, drawing distinctions and connections among them. In essence, this section serves as a foundational overview of how relationships between elements in sets can be characterized.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now let us define transitive relations. A relation R is called a transitive relation if the following universal quantification is true: if a R b and b R c in your relation, then a should also be related to c.
A transitive relation describes a special kind of relationship among three elements. If you have three elements, a, b, and c, and if a is related to b, and b is related to c, then for the relation to be transitive, a must be related to c. In simpler terms, if you can step from a to b and then from b to c, you should be able to step directly from a to c. This rule needs to hold true for every combination of a, b, and c in the relation.
Think of a social network where friendships are represented as relations. If Alice is friends with Bob (a R b), and Bob is friends with Charlie (b R c), it is likely that Alice is also friends with Charlie (a R c). The 'friend' relation is transitive because it exhibits the same property: if two individuals share a mutual friend, they may consider each other as friends too.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
In terms of graph theoretic properties, if you have an edge from a to b in the graph of your relation R, and if you have a directed edge from the node b to the node c in the graph of your relation R, then we need that there should be an edge from a to c as well.
In graph theory, a relation can be represented as a directed graph, where each element corresponds to a node and the relationship corresponds to directed edges between these nodes. For a relation to be transitive, if there is a directed edge from node a to node b and another edge from b to c, then there must also be a direct edge from a to c. This visual representation helps to understand how relationships flow and connect between different elements in the set.
Imagine a road network, where intersections are nodes and roads are directed edges. If there is a road from intersection A to intersection B, and another from B to intersection C, you would expect that there is also a road directly from A to C, making travel more efficient. The transitive nature of the road connections ensures that navigating through the network remains seamless.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Let us take an example. If we consider the first relation it is a transitive relation, of course. Because you have (1, 1) present which can also be interpreted as (a, b) as well as (b, c) as well as (a, c). So, again the same is true for (2, 2). However, your relation R is not transitive because you have a case here where you have (a, b) present, you also have (b, c) present but no (a, c) is present here.
This chunk presents specific examples to illustrate how transitivity works. If a relation includes (1, 1) and (2, 2), it is trivially transitive as (1, 1) relates to itself, and the same for (2, 2). However, if we look at another case where (a, b) exists, and (b, c) exists, but (a, c) is missing, the relation fails to be transitive. This highlights that not all relationships naturally maintain transitivity, and it's essential to verify it through individual instances.
Consider a classroom where students are encouraged to form study groups. If student A helps student B (a R b), and student B helps student C (b R c), it would be reasonable to expect that student A also helps student C (a R c). If student A does not assist student C despite these connections, the chain of support is broken, demonstrating a lack of transitivity. This shows that for effective collaboration, relationships must be maintained consistently across all connections.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Your relation R is also a transitive relation because it vacuously satisfies this implication because at the first place there is no (a, b) and (b, c) present in your R.
In logic, vacuous truth occurs when a statement is considered true because its premise is false. In the context of transitive relations, if there are no instances of (a, b) or (b, c) in the relation, then the implication about a relating to c does not need to be checked, it is vacuously true. This concept helps to manage cases where relationships may not exist but still conform to the rules of transitivity because there is no counterexample present.
Imagine a group of students in a club. If no one is leading any projects (there is no relation), you cannot claim that any two students will not collaborate. There's simply no evidence against the possibility. Hence, the claim that if one student should lead another in a project isn't applicable because no such leadership is established, making the statement vacuously true.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Transitive Relation: A relation that satisfies the property that if aRb and bRc, then aRc.
Matrix Representation: A way to depict relations using a two-dimensional array.
Graph Representation: A method to visualize relations as nodes and edges.
Asymmetric Relation: A type of relation where no two distinct elements are mutually connected.
Irreflexive Relation: A relation where no element is related to itself.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
Example 1: In a relation where (1, 2) and (2, 3) are present, the relation is transitive if (1, 3) is also present.
Example 2: A set with pairs like (a, b) and (b, c), but without (a, c) shows that the relation is not transitive.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
Transitive is a link in a chain, from a to b, then c we gain!
Imagine a family tree: Grandparent connects to parent, who connects to child. Thus, Grandparent connects to Child, illustrating transitivity.
T for Transitive equals T for Triangular, as all points connect through a common point.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Transitive Relation
Definition:
A relation R is transitive if whenever aRb and bRc, then aRc.
Term: Matrix Representation
Definition:
A method of representing a relation using a grid or table where rows and columns represent elements.
Term: Graph Representation
Definition:
A visualization method using nodes and directed edges to represent relations between elements.
Term: Asymmetric Relation
Definition:
A relation R is asymmetric if whenever aRb holds, bRa does not.
Term: Irreflexive Relation
Definition:
A relation R is irreflexive if no element is related to itself, meaning (a, a) is not in R.