Transitivity
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Interactive Audio Lesson
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Introduction to Partitions
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Today, we will explore what a partition of a set means. Can anyone tell me what they think a partition might be?
Is it when we divide a set into smaller parts?
Exactly! A partition divides a set into subsets that are completely separate from one another. Each subset must be non-empty. So, if we have a set C, how might we partition it?
You could split it into two or more non-overlapping groups.
Yes! And remember, for a partition to be valid, the union of these subsets must reconstruct the original set without leaving anything out. We can think of Indian states as a practical example.
So, every person in India belongs to one and only one state?
Exactly! Now, let's summarize. A partition has three main properties: subsets must be non-empty, they must not overlap, and their union must be the original set.
Equivalence Relations
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Let's transition to equivalence relations. Can anyone tell me what an equivalence relation might involve?
It’s a relation where elements are related in a certain way, right?
Correct! An equivalence relation must be reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. If I have a set C and an equivalence relation R, can you think about what the equivalence classes would be?
Wouldn’t the equivalence classes form groups within the set?
Exactly! Now, here's the important part: the equivalence classes actually form a partition of set C. Let’s think—what does that mean?
It means every element in C belongs to exactly one equivalence class, right?
Precisely! And no two classes overlap. Can someone remind me of the three properties of a partition that we discussed?
Non-empty, pairwise disjoint, and their union equals the whole set!
Excellent! Remember those properties as we explore more about equivalence relations.
Constructing Equivalence Relations
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Now let's see how we can create an equivalence relation from a given partition. If I provide the subsets from a partition, how would we go about defining an equivalence relation?
Maybe we write pairs of elements that belong to the same subset?
Exactly! For every subset, if elements belong to that subset, they are related. If our subsets are {A, B} and {C}, what pairs would we include in our relation?
For {A, B}, we’d have (A, A), (B, B), (A, B), (B, A) and for {C}, we’d just have (C, C).
Perfect! We collect all those pairs to form our relation R. Now, can anyone recall what properties we must check to ensure R is an equivalence relation?
Reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity!
Exactly, let’s take a couple of minutes to confirm R has these properties. Remember, if any property fails, we cannot call R an equivalence relation.
Relationship Between Equivalence Classes and Partitions
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
To summarize what we just learned, what is the crucial relationship between equivalence relations and partitions?
That every equivalence relation generates a partition, and every partition can create an equivalence relation.
Correct! They form a two-way street. Given a set, the number of equivalence relations equals the number of partitions. Can anyone summarize how we prove that?
We show that the equivalence classes from a relation meet the three partition properties and vice versa.
Exactly right! It's crucial to understand this interconnection. Now let's ensure we all are comfortable with this topic. Any questions?
Introduction & Overview
Read summaries of the section's main ideas at different levels of detail.
Quick Overview
Standard
In this section, we explore the definition of a partition of a set, illustrating its properties and significance. We then establish the relationship between equivalence relations and partitions, proving how equivalence classes form partitions and vice versa.
Detailed
Detailed Summary of Transitivity
In this section, we focus on two primary concepts: partitions of a set and equivalence relations. A partition of a set is defined as a collection of non-empty subsets that are pairwise disjoint. This means that for any two subsets, their intersection is empty, and the union of all subsets reconstructs the original set. Intuitively, a partition divides a set into distinct groups where no element is left out.
We provide the example of Indian states partitioning the country, emphasizing how each state (or subset) stands alone yet contributes to the overall identity of India (the entire set).
Next, we delve into the relationship between equivalence relations and partitions. We assert that if we have an equivalence relation on a set, the resulting equivalence classes form a partition of that set, satisfying all three requirements of a partition: each class is non-empty, their union is the original set, and they are pairwise disjoint. Conversely, given any partition, one can construct an equivalence relation such that the partition forms the equivalence classes. This duality demonstrates that the count of equivalence relations over a set aligns with the number of partitions of that set, reinforcing the significance of these concepts in the realm of discrete mathematics.
Youtube Videos
Audio Book
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Introduction to Transitivity in Relations
Chapter 1 of 5
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
So, let us formally prove this. Now, going to prove that a relation R that I am saying here to construct indeed will be reflexive, symmetric and transitive.
Detailed Explanation
In this section, we are ready to formally prove the properties of the relation R we constructed: reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. These properties are essential characteristics that define an equivalence relation. Understanding each of these properties will allow us to confirm whether our constructed relation truly qualifies as an equivalence relation.
Examples & Analogies
Think of reflexivity like a mirror reflecting your own image. When you stand in front of a mirror, you see yourself—this is reflexivity! Similarly, every element in our equivalence relation can relate to itself. Next, symmetry can be visualized as friendship: if A is friends with B, then B is also friends with A. Lastly, transitivity can be likened to a travel route: if you can travel from City A to City B, and then from City B to City C, then you can also travel directly from City A to City C.
Proving Reflexivity
Chapter 2 of 5
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
So, you take any element i from the set C, I have to show that (i,i) ∈ R to show that it is reflexive. Now since A_1,...,A_m is a partition of the set C, the element i will be present in one of the subsets in this collection say it is present in the subset A_k.
Detailed Explanation
To prove reflexivity, we must demonstrate that every element i in our set C can relate to itself as the ordered pair (i, i). Since the relation is based on a partition, every element must belong to at least one subset A_k. According to our construction rule, if i is in A_k, we will include (i, i) in our relation R. This guarantees that reflexivity is satisfied across all elements in the set.
Examples & Analogies
Consider a classroom where each student sees themselves in the group photo. This scenario illustrates reflexivity perfectly, as every student (element) is depicted relating to themselves just by being part of the group.
Proving Symmetry
Chapter 3 of 5
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
Now to prove that the relation R is symmetric as well, I have to show the following: if you take any arbitrary (i,j) ∈ R, then (j,i) ∈ R.
Detailed Explanation
To establish symmetry, we need to show that if an ordered pair (i, j) is in relation R, then the reverse pair (j, i) must also be part of R. This follows from our relation construction, where both elements i and j come from the same subset A_k. Thus, since we included both ordered pairs, symmetry holds true.
Examples & Analogies
Think about how friends share greetings: if Alice greets Bob, then Bob will greet Alice in return. The friendship reflects this symmetric relationship, similar to how pairs relate in our equivalence relation.
Proving Transitivity
Chapter 4 of 5
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
Let us prove that a relation R is transitive and for proving that my relation R is transitive, let me take an arbitrary ordered pairs. So, I take (i,j),(j,k) ∈ R and I have to show that the ordered pair (i,k) ∈ R.
Detailed Explanation
In transitivity, we want to confirm that if we have pairs (i, j) and (j, k) in relation R, then the pair (i, k) must also belong to R. Considering that all three elements i, j, and k are from the same subgroup A_k (due to the initial pairs), we can construct (i, k) when iterating over all possible elements. This completes our proof of transitivity.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine a family tree: if person A is a sibling of person B, and person B is a sibling of person C, then person A must also be a sibling of person C. This illustrates transitivity, allowing us to relate across links much like our relation R does amongst set elements.
The Relationship Between Equivalence Relations and Partitions
Chapter 5 of 5
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
So, that shows a very nice relationship and a nice property between the equivalence classes and the partition... the number of equivalence relations what we have established here actually is that the number of equivalence relations over C is exactly the same as number of partitions of set C.
Detailed Explanation
This section reveals a crucial finding: that there is a one-to-one correspondence between equivalence relations and partitions of a set. Each equivalence relation generates a unique partition through its equivalence classes, and conversely, every partition can be linked back to an equivalence relation. This connection emphasizes the deep relationship between these two mathematical concepts in discrete mathematics.
Examples & Analogies
Think of organizing a library: you can classify books into specific genres (equivalence relations) or arrange them in distinct sections, like 'fiction', 'non-fiction', or 'science' (partitions). Just as each genre represents a way to organize, each partition offers a method to classify books, illustrating how equivalence relations and partitions can represent organizational systems.
Key Concepts
-
Partition: A way of dividing a set into completely distinct and non-overlapping subsets.
-
Equivalence Relation: A type of relation satisfying reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity.
-
Equivalence Class: Groups consisting of elements that are equivalent to each other under the equivalence relation.
-
Reflexivity: The condition that each element relates to itself.
-
Symmetry: A mutual relationship between pairs of elements.
-
Transitivity: A relationship extending through a chain of related elements.
Examples & Applications
Example 1: Given the set C = {1, 2, 3, 4}, one potential partition could be {{1, 2}, {3, 4}}. Here, each subset is non-empty and their union reconstructs C.
Example 2: An equivalence relation could be 'is a sibling of'. If Alice is a sibling of Bob, and Bob is a sibling of Charlie, then Alice is also related to Charlie, fulfilling transitivity.
Memory Aids
Interactive tools to help you remember key concepts
Rhymes
To partition a set, make subsets neat,
Stories
Imagine a party where everyone must wear a specific color. The colors are red, blue, and green. Red guests don't interact with blue or green. At the end, all colors combine back for a final toast, illustrating a partition with distinct, non-overlapping groups.
Memory Tools
To remember the properties of equivalence relations, think 'RST': Reflexive, Symmetric, Transitive.
Acronyms
P.E.N.
Partition = Exclusive Non-intersecting subsets.
Flash Cards
Glossary
- Partition
A collection of pairwise disjoint non-empty subsets of a set that together recreate the original set.
- Equivalence Relation
A relation on a set that is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive.
- Equivalence Class
A subset of a set formed by elements that are equivalent to each other under a given equivalence relation.
- Reflexivity
A property of a relation where every element is related to itself.
- Symmetry
A property of a relation where if element A is related to element B, then B is related to A.
- Transitivity
A property of a relation where if A is related to B and B is related to C, then A is related to C.
Reference links
Supplementary resources to enhance your learning experience.